2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

'98 with 360 engine and 166k

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 29, 2012 | 11:45 AM
  #21  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,409
Likes: 4,214
From: Clayton MI
Default

If you are still losing pressure, even with a new pump..... yeah. Gotta do something about the bearing clearances. As a bandaid fix, you could go to a thicker oil.... 20w50 or some such. Not sure how much that would help.... High volume/pressure pump might make up for it as well.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2012 | 02:05 PM
  #22  
Johnny2Bad's Avatar
Johnny2Bad
Professional
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Augiedoggy
you know in theory what your saying makes perfect sense but my experience with experimenting with different oils in my vw tells me otherwise.... along with many many threads there debating the issues and side effects with different weight oils... they did make a difference both in oil pressure and in temp.as well as the amount of blowby .. maybe not so much 5w vs 10w but I know some thicker oils do run differently even when at full temp.
It's not so much the 5W vs 10W as it is the xxW-30, and conventional oil. The "big number" tells you (very generally) what kind of base oil you've got. Since a xx-30 grade is the "easiest" oil to make (fewest viscosity additives, etc) it's by far the most consistent from one brand/grade to the next, but they still vary a bit.

API grades are "mandatory"; ie you can't derate or over-rate an oil for viscosity. If it tests to 30 it's gotta be labeled 30, but the actual test numbers are what counts ... one 30 wt might fall in the 26-ish range while another might fall in the 34-ish range, and others in between. They would be tested at both room temperature and at 212F and would have to meet "big number" grade at both. They would all meet spec for 30 wt rating, straight or muligrade.

It's entirely possible that one brand/grade 5W-30 is actually slightly higher viscosity at temp than another's 10W-30, but they would still be close.

If you switch to a different "big number" grade, or change brands, yes, they could react differently to temperature changes. I would not suggest your experience isn't valid or real; I would even say it's expected.

You do need to be careful to not confuse pour point or appearance out of the bottle with what is actually going on in the motor under pressure and temperature. API tests for viscosity and pour point are different and not necessarily related, at least to the extent you can conclude one indicates the other with any consistency.

There is even some evidence that at least some North American oils don't all deal with elevated temperatures well; the API has so far refused to require a High Temperature High Shear rating (HTHS, done at 302F) so API oils are only rated at 212F; Europe and Japan have required this for a decade and some European OEMs have used it for two decades to recommend oils for their cars.

API is, it's worth noting, a group of oil companies and auto manufacturers. By all accounts it's the oil companies who've resisted the adoption of a HTHS test so far; the OEMs want it and have reacted to API's foot-dragging by creating their own specs that incorporate it (eg Dexos, etc). API does have an approved standard HTHS test regimen, it's just not required to get a grade and a donut.

You would think there was a reason. The oil companies give some mumbo-jumbo about "confusing consumers". I don't know how that could be genuine when the whole ZDDP issue is nothing if not confusing to consumers.

My earlier post should be seen in the context of him switching specifically from 10W-30 to 5W-30 and low oil pressure only. Maybe I should add that I assumed he used a similar quality oil in both cases, in which case differences, if any, would be slight. The 10W might result in higher oil pressure at startup by a few PSI if outside air is cool or cold but once the temp gauge is moving at all they should be essentially the same viscosity, so in that light he still needs to fix something. I think we've all used, say, 20W-50 oil in worn engines to get pressure up on a tired engine, but zero is zero. I don't think that's high enough to just switch oils and go, but even 5 PSI is way better than 0.
 

Last edited by Johnny2Bad; Apr 29, 2012 at 02:47 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2012 | 02:54 PM
  #23  
Johnny2Bad's Avatar
Johnny2Bad
Professional
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Moochoff
Is that the only possibility left if I can ask?
Well, it's not the only *possible* reason for your problems ... there could be a chunk of silicone in an oil passage, for example, and somehow your new oil filter might be plugged, it could be cam end play or bearings, but checking main bearings is the next logical step.
 

Last edited by Johnny2Bad; Apr 29, 2012 at 02:59 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2012 | 05:30 PM
  #24  
Augiedoggy's Avatar
Augiedoggy
Champion
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 8
From: Western NY,
Default

Originally Posted by Johnny2Bad
Well, it's not the only *possible* reason for your problems ... there could be a chunk of silicone in an oil passage, for example, and somehow your new oil filter might be plugged, it could be cam end play or bearings, but checking main bearings is the next logical step.
did you use a fram filter ... many fram line of filters are garbage... (I doubt its your issues just the same though)
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2012 | 07:13 PM
  #25  
Moochoff's Avatar
Moochoff
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 293
Likes: 1
From: Spirit Lake, IA
Default

It's a real shame but I wont be able to work on it much further to do working on the road for a few weeks...
I will pop her open again when I get a chance, thanks again for all the help
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 12:25 AM
  #26  
Moochoff's Avatar
Moochoff
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 293
Likes: 1
From: Spirit Lake, IA
Default

Alright, should I just order main bearing and rod bearings before I pop the pan off again?

Would you choose to do a full rebuild or just get by with the replacing the bearings?
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 08:50 AM
  #27  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,409
Likes: 4,214
From: Clayton MI
Default

Depends on the budget..... If you can afford a full rebuild, it sure wouldn't hurt at 160K plus miles....

If you just wanna get by for a while, I would use some plastigage on the rods/mains, and decide from there which ones, or all... to replace.

If you can afford the rebuild, but, are on the fence about it.... do a compression/leakdown test, and see what kind of shape your cylinders are in. If they are marginal, or worse... go for the rebuild. If the numbers look good, just go after the bearings.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 01:43 PM
  #28  
Moochoff's Avatar
Moochoff
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 293
Likes: 1
From: Spirit Lake, IA
Default

Thanks again for the help HeyYou,

What can a guy expect for the cost of the rebuild? How many hours for a certified mechanic?
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2012 | 01:45 PM
  #29  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,409
Likes: 4,214
From: Clayton MI
Default

A lot.... you can actually buy reman motors for less than what it would cost you to pay someone else to do it for you...... If you were going to do it yourself, THAT is where the savings would come in.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 PM.