DodgeForum.com

2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

HP 5.9 motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4, 2016 | 11:40 AM
Share
  #21  
dbbd1's Avatar
dbbd1
Record Breaker
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 4
Default
Thanks!
 
Reply
0
Old Feb 4, 2016 | 04:48 PM
Share
  #22  
UnregisteredUser's Avatar
UnregisteredUser
Grand Champion
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 6
From: Meeker, CO
Default
Originally Posted by jkeaton
Wins the internet.
I'M NOT WORTHY! I'M NOT WORTHY! I SUCK!

But thanks for the flowers, man.
 
Reply
0
Old Feb 4, 2016 | 09:24 PM
Share
  #23  
bargeman's Avatar
bargeman
Professional
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: The Buckeye State
Default
Im running a thrush welded and enjoy it. I rather just listen to the machine under the hood sing its song than the radio. I think I paid 33.00 plus shipping from summit.
 
Reply
0
Old Feb 4, 2016 | 09:27 PM
Share
  #24  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,413
Likes: 4,214
From: Clayton MI
Default
I got an edelbrock cat-back for my Firebird.... after I installed it, I never turned on the radio again. I LOVED the way that car sounded....
 
Reply
0
Old Feb 5, 2016 | 03:59 PM
Share
  #25  
dapepper9's Avatar
dapepper9
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 427
Likes: 7
From: Iowa/Nebraska Border
Default
Cruising down the interstate mine's either a slight deep rumble at 60mph or silent at 70mph lol
 
Reply
0
Old Feb 6, 2016 | 12:10 AM
Share
  #26  
Wildman4x4nut's Avatar
Wildman4x4nut
Record Breaker
Veteran: Army
10 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 162
From: Cle Elum, WA
Default
Name: 5.2%20torque%20curve_zpsqila85q8.jpg Views: 80 Size: 32.0 KB

Name: 5.9%20torque%20curve_zpsdhm6fodi.jpg Views: 54 Size: 29.8 KB
 
Reply
0
Old Feb 6, 2016 | 09:56 AM
Share
  #27  
fj5gtx's Avatar
fj5gtx
Record Breaker
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 105
From: PA
Default
Holy S***, the 5.9 torque comes on very early, and dwindles away just as quickly! Any dyno results for the same setup w/o kegger intake?
 
Reply
0
Old Feb 6, 2016 | 11:47 AM
Share
  #28  
dapepper9's Avatar
dapepper9
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 427
Likes: 7
From: Iowa/Nebraska Border
Default
Originally Posted by fj5gtx
Holy S***, the 5.9 torque comes on very early, and dwindles away just as quickly! Any dyno results for the same setup w/o kegger intake?
Not quite but here's m1 manifold, straight through muffler, and junk superchips. This is at the wheels
 
Last edited by dapepper9; Feb 6, 2016 at 11:52 AM.
Reply
0
Old Feb 6, 2016 | 11:53 AM
Share
  #29  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,413
Likes: 4,214
From: Clayton MI
Default
You LOSE horsepower and torque with the M1? That seems counter-intuitive......

Or is that flywheel horsepower with the big numbers, and rear wheel power with the lower numbers?
 
Reply
0
Old Feb 6, 2016 | 11:56 AM
Share
  #30  
dapepper9's Avatar
dapepper9
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 427
Likes: 7
From: Iowa/Nebraska Border
Default
Originally Posted by HeyYou
You LOSE horsepower and torque with the M1? That seems counter-intuitive......

Or is that flywheel horsepower with the big numbers, and rear wheel power with the lower numbers?

My post is WHP vs flywheel with the other curves. Still shows the curve though, m1 is just too much for a stock truck. Nothing till around 3k
 
Reply
0



Advanced Search
Reply Closed Thread Share
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:57 PM.