2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

5.2 stuck with 11.4 mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 6, 2018 | 09:46 PM
  #21  
Ramman18's Avatar
Ramman18
Champion
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,103
Likes: 109
From:
Default

^^^^^And he doesn't have any cats anymore. I'm sure that's messing with the sensors and overfueling. No matter what vehicle we're talking about, if you set the cruise for a whole tank of highway driving you will ALWAYS get more miles per gallon than a whole tank city driving. Anything else is just flat earth theory. So, if you're truly seeing the exact same mpg on both a whole tank of city and whole tank of hwy, something is definitely not right, either with the your repairs or calculations.
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2018 | 09:48 PM
  #22  
gamer35's Avatar
gamer35
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default

The NTK O2 sensor was good when I replaced it, I did it to simply observe impacts on fuel economy, since literally nothing happened in terms of performance or fuel economy, so I am guessing it isn't the problem. If the O2 sensor caused a problem, the fuel milage should have gone down, not stay at 11.4 mpg.

I do appreciate you guy's time. If a different O2 sensor and sparkplugs will give me better mileage than it is worth a shot. I just don't want to buy parts if they aren't the problem. This guy is a steady 11.4 mpg, on the nose, regardless of driving habits or repairs. It is impressive really.
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2018 | 09:49 PM
  #23  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,453
Likes: 4,218
From: Clayton MI
Default

If he is going by the overhead console, I think that is average MPG over the life of the truck, or, the last time it was zeroed out. (mine doesn't work, so, not sure.) If I am right, he would have to drive a LONG time to see that number change at all.

I don't trust them anyway. I use miles traveled, and how many gallons I put in at the next fillup and calculate myself. Still, on the 8 liter, the number is depressing.......
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2018 | 09:51 PM
  #24  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,453
Likes: 4,218
From: Clayton MI
Default

Originally Posted by gamer35
The NTK O2 sensor was good when I replaced it, I did it to simply observe impacts on fuel economy, since literally nothing happened in terms of performance or fuel economy, so I am guessing it isn't the problem. If the O2 sensor caused a problem, the fuel milage should have gone down, not stay at 11.4 mpg.

I do appreciate you guy's time. If a different O2 sensor and sparkplugs will give me better mileage than it is worth a shot. I just don't want to buy parts if they aren't the problem. This guy is a steady 11.4 mpg, on the nose, regardless of driving habits or repairs. It is impressive really.
So are you calculating yourself? Or are those numbers from the overhead console?

I had a chevy blazer like that once. (it was a 77 though.... so, no computers at all.) Didn't matter what I did, how it was loaded, what I was towing, or how I drove. 11 miles per gallon.
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2018 | 09:54 PM
  #25  
gamer35's Avatar
gamer35
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default

I calculate mileage by taking the trip meter mileage and dividing it by the amount of fuel it take to the nozzle clicks. I reset the trip meter and fill all the way up every time. I measure fuel economy every fill up of every car. I guess I am crazy about mileage.
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2018 | 09:58 PM
  #26  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,453
Likes: 4,218
From: Clayton MI
Default

Originally Posted by gamer35
I calculate mileage by taking the trip meter mileage and dividing it by the amount of fuel it take to the nozzle clicks. I reset the trip meter and fill all the way up every time. I measure fuel economy every fill up of every car. I guess I am crazy about mileage.
We tend to call that OCD......... Welcome to the club.
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2018 | 10:01 PM
  #27  
gamer35's Avatar
gamer35
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default

My 97 Subaru Outback at least variates on mileage to provide excitement. This guy is a VERY stern 11.4 mpg regardless of fuel grade or ethanol free.
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2018 | 10:20 PM
  #28  
2bit's Avatar
2bit
Record Breaker
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 35
From: Wisconsin
Default

Try taking the tuner out and then unhook the battery for a 1/2 hour. I personally would put a NTK O2 sensor in it. Your temperature sensor also affects fuel. After market PCV valves have been found to flow too much air, making them an undetectable vacuum leak. Use a Mopar PCV valve.
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2018 | 10:33 PM
  #29  
gamer35's Avatar
gamer35
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default

Would I be good with NGK O2 sensors?
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2018 | 10:59 PM
  #30  
Ramman18's Avatar
Ramman18
Champion
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,103
Likes: 109
From:
Default

NGK is NTK. NGK is spark plugs and NTK is sensors.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 AM.