2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

How much do front Air Dams help?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 19, 2018 | 04:48 PM
  #1  
V10Burnouts's Avatar
V10Burnouts
Thread Starter
|
Amateur
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default How much do front Air Dams help?

I've got a 98 2500 v10, and I have been averaging about 9 mpg. My truck doesn't have an air dam up front, and I run oversize Micky Thompsons (I know, that doesn't help at all) for tires. I was wondering if it would benefit my gas mileage to put an air dam up front, or if there are any other mods that help as well, without being too overboard.
thanks
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2018 | 06:22 PM
  #2  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,468
Likes: 4,221
From: Clayton MI
Default

Air dam won't make any difference at all. It's that big hole in the gas tank, that leads directly to 8 liters of VERY thirsty V-10 that's the problem. 9 is actually about average for these trucks. You might eek a bit more out, by doing a fresh tune-up, and changing the O2 sensors. (NTK or Denso only please, skip bosch, our trucks don't like 'em.)

Dropping back to stock tire size would help, or, as an alternative, regearing for the tires. Aside from that, just not much you can do. It IS 488 cubic inches after all.

And yes, I am in the same boat.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2018 | 07:08 PM
  #3  
V10Burnouts's Avatar
V10Burnouts
Thread Starter
|
Amateur
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
Air dam won't make any difference at all. It's that big hole in the gas tank, that leads directly to 8 liters of VERY thirsty V-10 that's the problem. 9 is actually about average for these trucks. You might eek a bit more out, by doing a fresh tune-up, and changing the O2 sensors. (NTK or Denso only please, skip bosch, our trucks don't like 'em.)

Dropping back to stock tire size would help, or, as an alternative, regearing for the tires. Aside from that, just not much you can do. It IS 488 cubic inches after all.

And yes, I am in the same boat.
The o2 sensors may or may not be gone, so would it be worth it to put them back in even without cats? It definitely runs rich, it smells like you could hold a lighter down at the pipe and get a flame.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2018 | 07:30 PM
  #4  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,468
Likes: 4,221
From: Clayton MI
Default

Yes. Definitely worth having them. Dodge runs them fairly rich by default, O2 sensors compensate for that. One of THE best things you can do for gas mileage. (I won't even consider calling it 'fuel economy' on these trucks..... they are anything BUT economical. )
 
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2018 | 08:28 PM
  #5  
V10Burnouts's Avatar
V10Burnouts
Thread Starter
|
Amateur
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

So, I looked below the truck tonight, and found that both banks do indeed have 1 sensor still hooked up. Is there supposed to be another after sensor 1 that would be beneficial to replace? I should mention that I am running performance headers as well.
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2018 | 08:06 AM
  #6  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,468
Likes: 4,221
From: Clayton MI
Default

8.0 has one sensor for each bank. There aren't any post-cat sensors, so, need to replace both of them.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 PM.