3rd Gen Dakota 2005 - 2011 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 3rd Gen Dakota.

Performance for a 3.7L?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 10:56 PM
  #1  
DAKid07's Avatar
DAKid07
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default Performance for a 3.7L?

Ok here is the deal I've been looking at CAI and dual exhaust for my '07 Dakota and I'm afraid to purchase anything cause I dont know how its going to effect the sound of my truck i want something that sounds good and im not sure about a 3.7L with dual exhaust im considering upgrading to a 4.7L what do you guys suggest?
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 11:04 PM
  #2  
Damn Dirty Ape's Avatar
Damn Dirty Ape
Professional
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Performance for a 3.7L?

Cue up the 'OMG 4.7 4 Lyfe' comments LOL. 3.7's aren't good for anything except getting groceries doncha know!

//see .sig hehe.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 11:15 PM
  #3  
superdak05's Avatar
superdak05
Champion
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,739
Likes: 8
From: ct.
Default RE: Performance for a 3.7L?

drop both resonators from the exhaust system and you will be fine,
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 07:08 AM
  #4  
sdsdsd's Avatar
sdsdsd
Captain
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: Malvern, Pa.
Default RE: Performance for a 3.7L?

If you drop both resonators you will noty have enough back pressure and will hurt fuel mileage.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 10:49 AM
  #5  
Racinartist's Avatar
Racinartist
All Star
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
From: Dirty Jerzey
Default RE: Performance for a 3.7L?

I have an 08 TRX with a 4.7 and I've been wondering what I can do with my stock exhaust to help flow, possibly give it a bit better sound, and maybe even help with fuel mileage. I didn't know which might be the best option to go with. Either dropping out the muffler and going with a straight pipe replacement, or dropping both resonators and keeping the stock can in place. On my 05 I had both resonators removed and it did give it a bit better sound, but I don't think it helped at all with mileage. I don't know if dropping the muffler and only running the resonators will make it too loud or not, which isn't something I particularly want.

Any thoughts would be appreciated.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 08:01 PM
  #6  
Shibby927's Avatar
Shibby927
Record Breaker
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 1
From: The Great State of Iowa
Default RE: Performance for a 3.7L?

Whatchoo talking bout Ape?! 3.7s fo life fo sho!
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 04:35 PM
  #7  
curtiplas's Avatar
curtiplas
Record Breaker
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
From: Motor City, Hockey Town, Metro Detroit
Default RE: Performance for a 3.7L?

My 3.7L f***in' rocks... of course, then again its not a auto either... so I can make that bitch fly if I want.[sm=gears.gif]
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2008 | 04:42 PM
  #8  
cramerica's Avatar
cramerica
Record Breaker
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: Central NY
Default RE: Performance for a 3.7L?

"then again its not a auto either... so I can make that bitch fly if I want."

+1
By now it's like saying the pledge of allegiance...you just have it memorized:

Free flow exhaust
Free flow intake
Performance Fluids
Electric Fan
Fastman Throttle Body

Some are still debated ; some guys swear by power wires (fools the computer into thinking incoming air is colder than it is) ; some love their underdrive pulley kits. Others not so much.

Thats about it for the lowly Dakota.

Lack of backpressure hurting fuel mileage is a load of crap. The less effort the engine wastes on pumping out exhaust the better. Just get a Magnaflow or Flowmaster or Cherry Bomb or whatever and you'll be fine. The 3.7 sounds halfway decent for a V6.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2008 | 08:03 PM
  #9  
BAdassR/T's Avatar
BAdassR/T
Record Breaker
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Performance for a 3.7L?

dude ditch the 6 get an 8 that solves everything........ F fuel mileage
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 01:09 PM
  #10  
MonkeyWrench4000's Avatar
MonkeyWrench4000
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,513
Likes: 2
Default RE: Performance for a 3.7L?

Its obveous by your name that you have an 07. So the chances that you will buy a V8 engine and drop it in, or buy a whole nother dakota for the V8 would be slim to none, lol.

I have the V6. I don't have any performance mods, just a small lift and larger tires. The V6 is a bit under powered for the size of this truck, so some basic bolt ons may do wonder's for a little extra power. I wouldnt spend TOO much money in this department however, because with this kinda stuff you never get your money back.

I would do a K&N intake/AEM intake, and a decent exhaust. THATS IT. I wouldnt mess with the JET chip thats junk. No offense to anyone, but its a paper weight. The JET line has always been BS and is frowned upon in the enthusiast community. A few people have them on there dakota because its the only option. (And its the only option because it took no research and development to make)

Intake, exhaust, enjoy. Im sure you can grab a realistic 15hp total between the two right? (which is pretty cool all considering) Prob sound pretty good too.

Other then that everything else is a waste of money IMO. This truck is not a good starting point for performance. Whether it has the V8 or the V6.

I mean...not to be Mr. Negative, but you can get yourself an SRT-4 Neon for like 15k these days, drop 5 grand into it, and have yourself 300hp+. I did it a few summers ago with my friends.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 PM.