3rd Gen Dakota 2005 - 2011 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 3rd Gen Dakota.

need a muffler?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-13-2008, 01:55 AM
whiteram00's Avatar
whiteram00
whiteram00 is offline
Captain
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default need a muffler?

a few months ago i had the back 2 resonators an muffler took off,an a y pipe with duals out the back,an i notice a lose in bottom end torque...would a muffler bring the lose back..and what sounds the best on the 4.7 standard output . magnaflow.flows,or mac
 
  #2  
Old 10-13-2008, 08:23 AM
lghtngblt02's Avatar
lghtngblt02
lghtngblt02 is offline
The RAM Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lemoyne, Pennsylvania
Posts: 9,649
Received 22 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Its your dual exhaust is why you lost the bottom end torque. This was from another forum and I felt it explains best why you lossed the torque.

I'm going to be towing as well...over Colorado's high passes so torque is also supremely important to me. I've done hours and hours of research on this issue to see how I can optimize the torque on my Tundra in that all-important-for-towing 2500 to 3500 RPM range.

From my research, I've concluded the key to getting maximum mid range torque is to maximize exhaust energy (heat) and velocity all the way to the end of the tailpipe...at the exhaust volumes and flow rates the engine produces in the mid range.

Furthermore, if possible, the pulses (from the exhaust valve openings) in the exhaust flow should be maintained...the low pressure on the back edge of one pulse helps pull along the high pressure on the leading edge of the next pulse. This is the principal of a scavenging exhaust.

The reason that dual exhausts...or overly large (like 2.5 inch and larger) single exhausts reduce low to mid range torque is they allow the exhaust gasses to expand (which cools them) and to lose velocity. The cooled air is denser/heavier...and the exhaust pulses more or less are merged together further losing their velocity and scavenging action. The net result is the larger exhaust pipes become essentially long tanks of semi-stagnant gas which has to be pushed out by the incoming exhaust...it's no longer self-scavenging. Or, in other words, a larger or dual exhaust has higher effective backpressure than a smaller, single exhaust at mid-range RPM . Yes, the larger/dual pipes have less wall friction on the gasses than the smaller single pipes but this effect is nullified by the loss of energy/velocity in the larger or dual pipes. It's very important to note this situation applies to the mid-RPM ranges...at very high RPM (like near redline), there's enough energy, volume, and velocity in the exhaust gasses to maintain scavenging all the way to the end of the pipes (even duals) and the lower wall friction of the larger pipes does come into play.

Bottom line: for mid RPM ranges, intuition is wrong...there's more effective back pressure (or less scavenging) in large or dual exhausts; for top end RPM, intuition is right...large/dual exhausts have lower backpressure. And at any RPM, backpressure is just plain bad for torque. There's a myth out there that engines need backpressure to make more torque. This is wrong. Backpressure is resistance and you want the least resistance. If you look at the dyno results and comments posted by V8toilet about his various systems you'll see that he got noticeably better mid range torque than stock by using a single 2.25 pipe running through a fairly low restriction Spintech muffler...and much, much better mid range torque than with either 2.5 inch single pipe or with dual exhausts.
As far as best sound, I like the setup I have on my truck. I used to have magnaflows and they were alittle over bearing IMO. Right now, the setup I have is Single in -> CherryBomb Pro Series Exhaust ->Single out. I removed the huge *** exhaust and deleted the rear resonator topping it off with a stainless tip. The 07s only have one resonator if you are wondering why I only took one off.

IMGP6588.jpg

IMGP6589.jpg

IMGP6590.jpg

and heres what it sounds like:
 
  #3  
Old 10-13-2008, 11:16 AM
superdak05's Avatar
superdak05
superdak05 is offline
Champion
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ct.
Posts: 4,741
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

i have a single 3 inch catback on my 05 dak. it has more low end grunt now then with the stock set up. all resonators were removed. the y-pipe was opened up just a bit. was running the newer inco set up but over time it rotted out. i now have the newer flowmaster and it is terrible sounding. so raspy it just doesnt sound right. i did have the cherry bomb dual on my fullsize and was very happy with it. but flowmaster sounds junky.
 
  #4  
Old 10-13-2008, 11:26 AM
lghtngblt02's Avatar
lghtngblt02
lghtngblt02 is offline
The RAM Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lemoyne, Pennsylvania
Posts: 9,649
Received 22 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by superdak05
i now have the newer flowmaster and it is terrible sounding. so raspy it just doesnt sound right. i did have the cherry bomb dual on my fullsize and was very happy with it. but flowmaster sounds junky.
I agree with ya on the Flowmasters...never been a fan of them because of the raspy sound...you gotta have alittle aggressive pop to it but not the crackle
 

Last edited by lghtngblt02; 10-13-2008 at 07:02 PM.
  #5  
Old 10-13-2008, 05:08 PM
BAdassR/T's Avatar
BAdassR/T
BAdassR/T is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

MAGNAFLOW I tell everyone this.. it sounds the best.... blowmaster needs to go out of business........
 
  #6  
Old 10-13-2008, 07:29 PM
whiteram00's Avatar
whiteram00
whiteram00 is offline
Captain
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah no flowmaster.i got them on my gt,raspy as hell,did cherry bomb give it a good rumble an tone or just get a magnaflow? an stick it behind the y-pipe......what about a mac flowpath muffler?
 
  #7  
Old 10-16-2008, 02:41 PM
mikset's Avatar
mikset
mikset is offline
Professional
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern Washington State
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Anyone tried the Dynomax Ultraflo on their 4.7? Clips I've heard of those sound awesome but haven't heard one on a 4.7. They also have very good performance numbers.
 
  #8  
Old 10-16-2008, 03:43 PM
Altair's Avatar
Altair
Altair is offline
Dak attack!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Turn down the heat please
Posts: 11,333
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by whiteram00
yeah no flowmaster.i got them on my gt,raspy as hell,did cherry bomb give it a good rumble an tone or just get a magnaflow? an stick it behind the y-pipe......what about a mac flowpath muffler?
I'm very happy with my Cherry Bomb (Vortex). Nice deep tone, decently loud when you're in the throttle, a little more reserved at idle and cruising speed, not raspy like flows but it definitely has an aggresive sound to it. I'm thinking of going louder when I get more engine stuff done but I will probably stick with Cherry Bomb, maybe move up to an Extreme (though I have a feeling it would be hard to pass inspection with that one).
 
  #9  
Old 10-16-2008, 03:53 PM
lghtngblt02's Avatar
lghtngblt02
lghtngblt02 is offline
The RAM Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lemoyne, Pennsylvania
Posts: 9,649
Received 22 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Go cherrybomb
 
  #10  
Old 10-16-2008, 08:21 PM
lowcountrykid's Avatar
lowcountrykid
lowcountrykid is offline
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

im thinkin about changein mine ...i have an off brand called powerpak?? but a buddy has a set of cherrybomb extremes on his chevy and they sound Great. How would borla sound on our trucks.
 


Quick Reply: need a muffler?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 PM.