3rd Gen Dakota 2005 - 2011 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 3rd Gen Dakota.

Dakota for first car?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 11-21-2011, 02:54 PM
jkeaton's Avatar
jkeaton
jkeaton is offline
DF Admin
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Winston Salem, NC
Posts: 27,837
Received 349 Likes on 310 Posts
Default

the 05-07 have a different body style than the 08 and up, but all are called 3rd generation on this forum. The 05-07 are prone to premature front end parts failure (ball joints, tie rods, sway bar end links and struts). I'm not sure if they beefed these parts up on the 08 and up models but I think they all have their problems. If not already done, be prepared to have to replace these parts. Struts especially. There are only so many choices for aftermnarket parts for these trucks, not a lot of aftermarket support. The 08- up's have more power from the 4.7. Mileage for either engine (3.7L V6 or 4.7L V8) is not that great. 14-18 average, some get more, some get less. If your looking for mileage, I'd say stay away from the Dakota simply because you are not going to get good mileage no matter what you do. Speaking from experience, I have done everything but get into the internals and still average the same as when it was completely stock. (16 mpg). But, if you are looking for a truck that is fun to drive, roomy and different (not a lot of the around) go for it. I love mine and would do it all over again if I could.
 
  #12  
Old 11-21-2011, 03:14 PM
DodgeCares's Avatar
DodgeCares
DodgeCares is offline
Champion
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Mopar HQ
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ram_fan
Hey guys, im pretty new here and I'm considering a Dakota for a first car. Im in high school and can get a car the next school year. The only thing holding me back is my parents. They they Dodge vehicles are totally unreliable and fall apart. Is there anything to convince them otherwise? Also, is a Dakota (2005-2008) a good first car? Thanks!

Ram,

If you find one you like, PM me the VIN and I will check for recalls and warranty restrictions for you.
 
  #13  
Old 11-21-2011, 03:25 PM
lghtngblt02's Avatar
lghtngblt02
lghtngblt02 is offline
The RAM Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lemoyne, Pennsylvania
Posts: 9,649
Received 23 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by URBANRDNECK
My gen. is less thirsty? Wow never thought that was possible. You guys must have terrible mileage
Who said that, they are crazy... I average 17 city and 20 highway...

My 1st Gen, the best I would get was 16 with the 3.9L
 
  #14  
Old 11-21-2011, 03:33 PM
thunder98110's Avatar
thunder98110
thunder98110 is offline
Champion
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: DC
Posts: 4,084
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=EliteTempleton;2649602]I drove a 1st Gen Dak around in H.S. - worked well for me. Till I totaled it...

What state/province are you in?

If gas mileage is a concern I'd point you toward 2nd gen Dakota's, they're less thirsty. I drove one of those around for most of the last decade. If I were looking at 2nd Gen's I'd personally narrow my search to the 545RFE Transmission which means 2003-2004.[/QUOTE]

the 2000 daks had the 45rfe too. jeeps, rams they all use the 45rfe
 
  #15  
Old 11-21-2011, 03:33 PM
rebel4055's Avatar
rebel4055
rebel4055 is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North Vernon, Indiana
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lghtngblt02
Who said that, they are crazy... I average 17 city and 20 highway...

My 1st Gen, the best I would get was 16 with the 3.9L
Mine is around yours too. It really doesn't "guzzle" gas.
 
  #16  
Old 11-21-2011, 03:39 PM
dingdong2's Avatar
dingdong2
dingdong2 is offline
Professional
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a 2007 Dakota ST, the absolute bare-bones model with no features; 2WD, 6-speed stick, 3.7L V6. I pretty much always get around 18MPG and I drive 32 to and from work, all highway. I wouldn't say it guzzles gas but I think such a basic truck should be over 20 MPG on the highway.


Originally Posted by lghtngblt02
Who said that, they are crazy... I average 17 city and 20 highway...

My 1st Gen, the best I would get was 16 with the 3.9L
 
  #17  
Old 11-22-2011, 08:28 AM
EliteTempleton's Avatar
EliteTempleton
EliteTempleton is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by URBANRDNECK
My gen. is less thirsty? Wow never thought that was possible. You guys must have terrible mileage
From my experience & understanding, yeah. My '02 got 18 MPG give or take. My '05 averages 13. The 3rd gens are longer and wider, plus in my case I have the added weight of the QC. It's a great truck, but I don't think I could have afforded to drive it around when I was younger.

Originally Posted by URBANRDNECK
The Quad Cab's are great aren't they? I love mine
My favorite part is that it's harder for my toddler to kick the back of my seat repeatedly...

I just have to get over the shorter bed by getting a hauler rack and I'll be all set!
 
  #18  
Old 11-22-2011, 10:42 AM
EliteTempleton's Avatar
EliteTempleton
EliteTempleton is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thunder98110
Originally Posted by elitetempleton
i drove a 1st gen dak around in h.s. - worked well for me. Till i totaled it...

What state/province are you in?

If gas mileage is a concern i'd point you toward 2nd gen dakota's, they're less thirsty. I drove one of those around for most of the last decade. If i were looking at 2nd gen's i'd personally narrow my search to the 545rfe transmission which means 2003-2004.
the 2000 daks had the 45rfe too. Jeeps, rams they all use the 45rfe
My source for that was Wikipedia:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
Applications:
45RFE
2000–2002 Dodge Dakota (4.7L)
545RFE
2003–2011 Dodge Dakota (4.7L, 4.7L H.O.)
It was written so directly I didn't question it.

But of course your comment made me question it, and knowing that Wikipedia is an open community environment I kept digging until I found a better explanation:
Originally Posted by allpar.com
2003 Dodge Dakota Changes
For 2003, the 545RFE five-speed automatic was finally available with the 4.7, for better passing acceleration and an overall superior driving experience. It was optional on the Sport, Sport Plus, SLT, and SLT Plus.
But my brain was still telling me that atleast the 3rd gens were 545RFE only, not optional. So of course more looking, and found this:
Originally Posted by allpar.com
The 2005 and later Dodge Dakota in detail, with specifications and engines
TRANSMISSIONS

GETRAG 238 - MANUAL 6-SPEED OVERDRIVE

Availability: Std. – 3.7 and 4.7 standard output
Description: Synchronized in all gears

42RLE - AUTOMATIC, 4-SPEED OVERDRIVE

Availability: Available with 3.7L engine
Description: Clutch-selected planetary gear sets full electronic control, electronically controlled torque converter clutch

545RFE, AUTOMATIC FIVE-SPEED OVERDRIVE

Availability: 4.7L engines
Description: Clutch-selected planetary gear sets full electronic control, electronically controlled torque converter clutch
Soooo... What had happened was.... whenever I looked up my transmission a few months ago I only concerned myself with 3rd gen 4.7 Automatics, being that's what I have. Which, according to the internet, only came with 545RFE's.

Sorry for any confusion.
 



Quick Reply: Dakota for first car?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 PM.