3rd Gen Dakota 2005 - 2011 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 3rd Gen Dakota.

Dakota for first car?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 21, 2011 | 02:54 PM
  #11  
jkeaton's Avatar
jkeaton
DF Admin
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 28,198
Likes: 363
From: Winston Salem, NC
Default

the 05-07 have a different body style than the 08 and up, but all are called 3rd generation on this forum. The 05-07 are prone to premature front end parts failure (ball joints, tie rods, sway bar end links and struts). I'm not sure if they beefed these parts up on the 08 and up models but I think they all have their problems. If not already done, be prepared to have to replace these parts. Struts especially. There are only so many choices for aftermnarket parts for these trucks, not a lot of aftermarket support. The 08- up's have more power from the 4.7. Mileage for either engine (3.7L V6 or 4.7L V8) is not that great. 14-18 average, some get more, some get less. If your looking for mileage, I'd say stay away from the Dakota simply because you are not going to get good mileage no matter what you do. Speaking from experience, I have done everything but get into the internals and still average the same as when it was completely stock. (16 mpg). But, if you are looking for a truck that is fun to drive, roomy and different (not a lot of the around) go for it. I love mine and would do it all over again if I could.
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2011 | 03:14 PM
  #12  
DodgeCares's Avatar
DodgeCares
Champion
10 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,053
Likes: 28
From: Mopar HQ
Default

Originally Posted by ram_fan
Hey guys, im pretty new here and I'm considering a Dakota for a first car. Im in high school and can get a car the next school year. The only thing holding me back is my parents. They they Dodge vehicles are totally unreliable and fall apart. Is there anything to convince them otherwise? Also, is a Dakota (2005-2008) a good first car? Thanks!

Ram,

If you find one you like, PM me the VIN and I will check for recalls and warranty restrictions for you.
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2011 | 03:25 PM
  #13  
lghtngblt02's Avatar
lghtngblt02
The RAM Administrator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,647
Likes: 12
From: Lemoyne, Pennsylvania
Default

Originally Posted by URBANRDNECK
My gen. is less thirsty? Wow never thought that was possible. You guys must have terrible mileage
Who said that, they are crazy... I average 17 city and 20 highway...

My 1st Gen, the best I would get was 16 with the 3.9L
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2011 | 03:33 PM
  #14  
thunder98110's Avatar
thunder98110
Champion
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,084
Likes: 6
From: DC
Default

[QUOTE=EliteTempleton;2649602]I drove a 1st Gen Dak around in H.S. - worked well for me. Till I totaled it...

What state/province are you in?

If gas mileage is a concern I'd point you toward 2nd gen Dakota's, they're less thirsty. I drove one of those around for most of the last decade. If I were looking at 2nd Gen's I'd personally narrow my search to the 545RFE Transmission which means 2003-2004.[/QUOTE]

the 2000 daks had the 45rfe too. jeeps, rams they all use the 45rfe
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2011 | 03:33 PM
  #15  
rebel4055's Avatar
rebel4055
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: North Vernon, Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by lghtngblt02
Who said that, they are crazy... I average 17 city and 20 highway...

My 1st Gen, the best I would get was 16 with the 3.9L
Mine is around yours too. It really doesn't "guzzle" gas.
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2011 | 03:39 PM
  #16  
dingdong2's Avatar
dingdong2
Professional
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Default

I have a 2007 Dakota ST, the absolute bare-bones model with no features; 2WD, 6-speed stick, 3.7L V6. I pretty much always get around 18MPG and I drive 32 to and from work, all highway. I wouldn't say it guzzles gas but I think such a basic truck should be over 20 MPG on the highway.


Originally Posted by lghtngblt02
Who said that, they are crazy... I average 17 city and 20 highway...

My 1st Gen, the best I would get was 16 with the 3.9L
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2011 | 08:28 AM
  #17  
EliteTempleton's Avatar
EliteTempleton
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by URBANRDNECK
My gen. is less thirsty? Wow never thought that was possible. You guys must have terrible mileage
From my experience & understanding, yeah. My '02 got 18 MPG give or take. My '05 averages 13. The 3rd gens are longer and wider, plus in my case I have the added weight of the QC. It's a great truck, but I don't think I could have afforded to drive it around when I was younger.

Originally Posted by URBANRDNECK
The Quad Cab's are great aren't they? I love mine
My favorite part is that it's harder for my toddler to kick the back of my seat repeatedly...

I just have to get over the shorter bed by getting a hauler rack and I'll be all set!
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2011 | 10:42 AM
  #18  
EliteTempleton's Avatar
EliteTempleton
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by thunder98110
Originally Posted by elitetempleton
i drove a 1st gen dak around in h.s. - worked well for me. Till i totaled it...

What state/province are you in?

If gas mileage is a concern i'd point you toward 2nd gen dakota's, they're less thirsty. I drove one of those around for most of the last decade. If i were looking at 2nd gen's i'd personally narrow my search to the 545rfe transmission which means 2003-2004.
the 2000 daks had the 45rfe too. Jeeps, rams they all use the 45rfe
My source for that was Wikipedia:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
Applications:
45RFE
2000–2002 Dodge Dakota (4.7L)
545RFE
2003–2011 Dodge Dakota (4.7L, 4.7L H.O.)
It was written so directly I didn't question it.

But of course your comment made me question it, and knowing that Wikipedia is an open community environment I kept digging until I found a better explanation:
Originally Posted by allpar.com
2003 Dodge Dakota Changes
For 2003, the 545RFE five-speed automatic was finally available with the 4.7, for better passing acceleration and an overall superior driving experience. It was optional on the Sport, Sport Plus, SLT, and SLT Plus.
But my brain was still telling me that atleast the 3rd gens were 545RFE only, not optional. So of course more looking, and found this:
Originally Posted by allpar.com
The 2005 and later Dodge Dakota in detail, with specifications and engines
TRANSMISSIONS

GETRAG 238 - MANUAL 6-SPEED OVERDRIVE

Availability: Std. – 3.7 and 4.7 standard output
Description: Synchronized in all gears

42RLE - AUTOMATIC, 4-SPEED OVERDRIVE

Availability: Available with 3.7L engine
Description: Clutch-selected planetary gear sets full electronic control, electronically controlled torque converter clutch

545RFE, AUTOMATIC FIVE-SPEED OVERDRIVE

Availability: 4.7L engines
Description: Clutch-selected planetary gear sets full electronic control, electronically controlled torque converter clutch
Soooo... What had happened was.... whenever I looked up my transmission a few months ago I only concerned myself with 3rd gen 4.7 Automatics, being that's what I have. Which, according to the internet, only came with 545RFE's.

Sorry for any confusion.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:32 AM.