3rd Gen Dakota 2005 - 2011 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 3rd Gen Dakota.
View Poll Results: A poll
2.5" exhaust
64.71%
3" exhaust
35.29%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

2.5" or 3"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 31, 2006 | 07:14 PM
  #11  
WorrGames's Avatar
WorrGames
Professional
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2.5" or 3"

Im gonna say 2.5 dual exhaust with flowmaster. I dont know what the exact setup is but thats what im shootin for. I think gibson has a pretty cool dual setup.
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 12:51 AM
  #12  
FONTANA MOTORSPORTS's Avatar
FONTANA MOTORSPORTS
Professional
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2.5" or 3"

yea heres the pics..they are right here.....check the link....i do have some more but i cant find them....
exhaust pic
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 01:41 AM
  #13  
DakotaStone's Avatar
DakotaStone
Champion
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,521
Likes: 1
From: Spokane, WA
Default RE: 2.5" or 3"

I'm looking at getting the Gibson system. I know that the 2.5 will give you better torque because of the back pressure. The bigger the pipes, the less back pressure, the less torque.
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 01:30 PM
  #14  
rayj05's Avatar
rayj05
Amateur
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Default RE: 2.5" or 3"

what gibson exhaust are you looking at i was thinking about the dual extreme swept side just trying to get more info on it
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 03:46 PM
  #15  
DakotaStone's Avatar
DakotaStone
Champion
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,521
Likes: 1
From: Spokane, WA
Default RE: 2.5" or 3"

Same one I'm looking at. The Dual Extreme. I saw it at Summit Racing for $378. I know of a company here in Vancouver that will put it on for a total of $450.
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 05:18 PM
  #16  
rayj05's Avatar
rayj05
Amateur
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Default RE: 2.5" or 3"

well thanks for the info the cheapest that i found it was for 509 but that was just from some shops here colorado springs plus when i talked to the tech from gibson he said that the application was very simple to put on they provide everything that you would need to install it yourself if you didnt feel like spending the extra money to have someone else do it

 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 02:07 PM
  #17  
rayj05's Avatar
rayj05
Amateur
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Default RE: 2.5" or 3"

my fault you must be talking about the aluminum one i am looking at the stainless one
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 04:39 PM
  #18  
DakotaStone's Avatar
DakotaStone
Champion
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,521
Likes: 1
From: Spokane, WA
Default RE: 2.5" or 3"

Yeah. Why buy something that shiny just to have it get all mard up. The aluminum is also a little bit lighter.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 05:01 PM
  #19  
rayj05's Avatar
rayj05
Amateur
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Default RE: 2.5" or 3"

thats true but were im from the aluminum would not last to long with the amount of salt that gets put down on the roads
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 05:45 PM
  #20  
FONTANA MOTORSPORTS's Avatar
FONTANA MOTORSPORTS
Professional
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2.5" or 3"

aluminumized...its still steel with a aluminum coating (for rust prevention) the stainless is lighter or the same as steel in these aplications... 304 stainless is lighter than steel or 409 stainless
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:42 PM.