3rd Gen Durango 2011+ models

Trying to decide between Explorer, Durango.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 18, 2011 | 06:48 PM
  #11  
cdn_tbird's Avatar
cdn_tbird
Amateur
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: GTA
Default

Originally Posted by airbornedoc
Thank you. I'm going to assume you're saying you had problems with the spacing in the Explorer, not the Durango.
I wouldn't call it a problem, more of an issue with spacing of seats in the Explorer for us, but is probably fine for others.

We went with the V6 AWD Crew Plus (CrewLux in the US). Power wise it is more than enough for us for our camping trips and as one of our daily use vehicles.
 
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2011 | 10:29 PM
  #12  
fincher's Avatar
fincher
Professional
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Northern Illinois
Default

Congrats. Wise choice. It came down to Explorer and Durango for us, too. We kept going back to the Dodgr after test driving several makes.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2011 | 03:59 AM
  #13  
gamoon's Avatar
gamoon
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default

We had to make the same decision 6 months ago between the Explorer and the Durango. One issue that was troubling with the Explorer is the high end MYSYNC system. We drove 5 Explorers at multiple dealerships and they all had MYSYNC issues (lock ups, freezing, NAV, etc.) embarassing. Also the ride quality of the Durango was much better than the Explorer in our opinion. We have the V6 Citadel and could not be more happy with our purchase so far.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2011 | 10:41 AM
  #14  
2011HEAT's Avatar
2011HEAT
Professional
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 148
Likes: 3
From: Nassau County, NY
Default

Originally Posted by real_texan
Why does a 20000 journey has led tail lights but my 50000 Durango does not.
Agreed! Shame the 2011 D doesn't have LED tails yet other models including the Charger do. Though I think the Charger's LEDs are a bit much with the entire *** lit up. Figured the 2012 D would have LEDs but I see they don't. May be they'll include for the 13's. I'll wait until more aftermarkets come out for my 11.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2011 | 01:39 AM
  #15  
IndyDurango's Avatar
IndyDurango
Champion
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,822
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
Default

2013 will be the year all the bugs are worked out and the cool tidbits will start to show up. 2014 could be uber cool.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2011 | 11:40 AM
  #16  
TonyCrew's Avatar
TonyCrew
Professional
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by IndyDurango
2013 will be the year all the bugs are worked out and the cool tidbits will start to show up. 2014 could be uber cool.
i agree. and it will be time to re-lease!!
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2011 | 02:15 AM
  #17  
IndyDurango's Avatar
IndyDurango
Champion
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,822
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
Default

You are correct TC. Also one of the best reasons to lease. My wife swaps something every 4 years. She is in a Toyota FJ Cruiser now.

Historically on the Durango, Dodge updated the underhood and interior in 2001 from the 1998. Thus the initial release was 3 years from update. Arguably, the 2000 has some of the 2001 features but not all.

The 2001 features went another 3 years until the Gen2 release in 2004.

The 2004 kept everything the same for 3 more years until the sheetmetal upgrades on the 2007.

The 2007 lasted 3 years through the 2009 model year. With the big differences on the front and fenders, some considered this a Gen2.5 release.

There was no 2010 D and the Gen3 2011 was a tad rushed having an original slate as a 2012 release.

By the 3 year stair step release history, and the early release of the 2011, 2014 should be the latest most tech advanced, tried and true Gen3 prior to some kind of refresh.

I think we get a much improved Nav/DVD/Sat/Radio setup well before then and I expect a freshen-up to the rearend sheet metal for 2014/15 if not sooner. There may be a front grille change-a-roo earlier too as Dodge phases out the cross hair design. Or they save that and the rear for a complete 2014/15 refresh. Having not followed Fiat/Alpha/Ferr, I don't know what their normal timelines are. They may move sooner or squeeze a few more bucks out of existing tooling by waiting longer. Dunno.

All of this of course is JMHO.

IndyDurango
 

Last edited by IndyDurango; Nov 21, 2011 at 02:21 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2011 | 02:59 PM
  #18  
JRRF's Avatar
JRRF
Captain
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Default

I drove the Exp and had money down on a deal before the dealer tried to screw me! No doubt the Exp drives more like a truck, and actually feels better. I didn't even consider the D until my Exp deal fell through. Then I drove the D and was impressed with just about everything. The Ford is a bit more hi-tech, but the overall execution and quality is not nearly as good. The D rides better, handles better, is quieter, has more passenger room, etc., etc. V8 mpg is not great, but I couldn't get a V6 with all the goodies I wanted. I still think the Exp is a sharp vehicle, but I don't have one regret.
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2011 | 02:45 PM
  #19  
airbornedoc's Avatar
airbornedoc
Thread Starter
|
Amateur
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Default Ready to pull the trigger... V6 vs V8??

I don't pull anything. I want the quietest ride. And my 16 will be learning to drive on it. Seeking all opinions. Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2011 | 04:40 PM
  #20  
shrpshtr325's Avatar
shrpshtr325
THE ULTI-MOD
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,797
Likes: 36
From: Union NJ
Default

if your going to be teaching anew driver on it get the v6, it has plenty of power for around town/highway driving (without towing) and not so much power that your kid can do something too stupid.


although IMO its better to teach someone to drive on an older car so that when (not IF, but WHEN) they hit something you dont get as upset about it because it wont be the first damage done to the car (hopefully)
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 AM.