Superchips Questions and Updates

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 12:10 PM
  #331  
Scott@Superchips's Avatar
Scott@Superchips
Former Vendor
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

It's a new issue to me at this point so I am trying to figure out how far it's gone. I have not received any reports from customer service on the issue so I assume it is isolated.

Scott
 
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 01:33 PM
  #332  
Jason D's Avatar
Jason D
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Default

Well I am not real confident in the update that finaly got uploaded to my programer on the third attempt. So I dont think that I am even going to try and program my truck at this point.
 
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 03:27 PM
  #333  
Stormin264's Avatar
Stormin264
Professional
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: St Petersburg, FL
Default Performance vs. Tow Mode

Can anyone explain, in layman's terms, the difference in the 'performance' and the 'tow' mode tuning on my Cortex programmer? I havent taken it out and run times and all that, but I really dont see/feel a difference between them just driving on the street. Thanks.
 
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 03:42 PM
  #334  
Scott@Superchips's Avatar
Scott@Superchips
Former Vendor
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

Tow has less agressive timing and trans line pressure/shift point adjustments than the 91 perf file.

Scott
 
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 03:47 PM
  #335  
Stormin264's Avatar
Stormin264
Professional
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: St Petersburg, FL
Default

I appreciate the fast response Scott. I was looking for a little more clarity.
Like what do you mean by "less agressive timing and trans line pressure/shift point adjustments"?
Does the tow mode shift the trans sooner/quicker to keep the rpm's higher?
 
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 04:19 PM
  #336  
Scott@Superchips's Avatar
Scott@Superchips
Former Vendor
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

Ok, I confirmed with engineering that onlu timing was changed between the two settings to reduct detonation under load. Trans settings are the same between the two.

Scott
 
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 05:17 PM
  #337  
Stormin264's Avatar
Stormin264
Professional
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: St Petersburg, FL
Default

Thanks Scott.
That's interesting. seeing as Ramhunter says he feels more low end torque in the 'tow' setting. When, in fact, there is no difference in trans shift points/line pressure.

I would be curious to know the difference between stock and the 'perf' file.
 
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 05:39 PM
  #338  
ramhunter9's Avatar
ramhunter9
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,343
Likes: 0
Default

i went round and round with the SC tecs and they never could figure it out . my performance tune felt like stock to the T . that is why i run tow tune i feel a tune when im in that mode ..man i wish i could get my money back !!!! can only use tow or 89 because performance tune sucks . in mine anyway.
 
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 05:48 PM
  #339  
blackram2500's Avatar
blackram2500
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default V 10 Superchips

What is available for the V 10 from Superchips. I havent had much luck finding anything.
 
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 06:48 PM
  #340  
Off_Road_Teacher's Avatar
Off_Road_Teacher
Banned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,759
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by ramhunter1
i went round and round with the SC tecs and they never could figure it out . my performance tune felt like stock to the T . that is why i run tow tune i feel a tune when im in that mode ..man i wish i could get my money back !!!! can only use tow or 89 because performance tune sucks . in mine anyway.
Don't they offer your money back if you are not impressed by the performance gains? You should contact them and see.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:38 AM.