long or short headers?
Try checking in the 2nd generation forum as those guys have more knowledge of the 5.9 than those of us in the 3rd gen as we are only really used to the 4.7 and the 5.7 liter.
Also, I would go with long tubes.
Also, I would go with long tubes.
It is hard to find honest dyno tests of headers on engines
but as rough estimates
you can count on about 2-3% horsepower gains
when shorty (9-20 inches primary) headers are in front of muffler and catalytic converters
and about 4-5% horsepower gains when long tube (32-39 inch)
headers are run with no mufflers or catalytic converters.
It is also worth noting
that when Steve Dulcich dyno'ed 38 inch long tube TTI headers
on a 5.9 Magnum V8 recently
in Spring 2007 Engine Masters magazine
he found no gain below 2500 rpm
and most daily driving is in the 1500-2500 rpm range.
more info
https://dodgeforum.com/m_724162/tm.htm
http://www.moparmusclemagazine.com/t...ust/index.html
but as rough estimates
you can count on about 2-3% horsepower gains
when shorty (9-20 inches primary) headers are in front of muffler and catalytic converters
and about 4-5% horsepower gains when long tube (32-39 inch)
headers are run with no mufflers or catalytic converters.
It is also worth noting
that when Steve Dulcich dyno'ed 38 inch long tube TTI headers
on a 5.9 Magnum V8 recently
in Spring 2007 Engine Masters magazine
he found no gain below 2500 rpm
and most daily driving is in the 1500-2500 rpm range.
more info
https://dodgeforum.com/m_724162/tm.htm
http://www.moparmusclemagazine.com/t...ust/index.html
It is not news that headers usually give no HP gain at low rpm...
Loss of low end torque is also typical.
Loss of low end torque is also typical.



