3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Why 6 instead of 8?

Old Feb 11, 2008 | 12:17 PM
  #31  
BRINKLEY's Avatar
BRINKLEY
Professional
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Why 6 instead of 8?

previously I had a 2004 quad cab 5.9 liter. averaged about 11-13 miles to the gallon. I have to have a truck since I'm remodelling my house, but the 5.9 liter was eating a hole in my pocket, and I really didn't need that much power anyway. I traded it in for a 2005 regular cab v-6. I lost some options, but will gradually upgrade things. I think the v-6 is alot more practical for me, and it doesn't rape my billfold near as much.
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 12:11 AM
  #32  
BigRamBoy's Avatar
BigRamBoy
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Why 6 instead of 8?

Just curious, but if fuel economy is the main concern, why did you look at a 1/2 ton truck?
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 08:07 PM
  #33  
BRINKLEY's Avatar
BRINKLEY
Professional
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Why 6 instead of 8?

BigRamBoy, if your question was directed at me, its because of the room and the way the truck looks.
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:42 PM
  #34  
BigRamBoy's Avatar
BigRamBoy
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Why 6 instead of 8?

Copy that. Yeah i agree I was just curious on your thinking. Alot of these guys say the 3.7 sucks for mileage but I'm getting 18 in the city right now so I don't think its terrible. Least not for a fullsize truck
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 11:34 AM
  #35  
XxSilentHawk99xX's Avatar
XxSilentHawk99xX
Captain
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Why 6 instead of 8?

I bought mine for one because I needed a truck...and at the time I couldn't afford a V8 HEMI or such. My truck now after the performance parts I threw into it is getting on average about 15-16 mpg on the streets....however, I can't complain though the truck is quite a bit underpowered.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 09:20 PM
  #36  
BigRamBoy's Avatar
BigRamBoy
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Why 6 instead of 8?

So did the parts you have lifted actually make a difference in your trucks performance? It doesn't seem like it would do much since its such a small engine but seems like you've put a significant amount into it
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 04:05 PM
  #37  
mattmus4357's Avatar
mattmus4357
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Why 6 instead of 8?

I got mine because my uncle works at a Dodge dealership and he helped me get it brand new for about $12,500. I don't care what kind of engine I have, as long as it gets the job done. It gets good fuel mileage and I can pull my 16' landscaping trailer fully loaded without any problems.
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 07:59 PM
  #38  
raminator08's Avatar
raminator08
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default RE: Why 6 instead of 8?

I didnt choose-my dad bought it for me
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 03:23 AM
  #39  
roadney's Avatar
roadney
Professional
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Default RE: Why 6 instead of 8?

Ibought my 20023.7 last year for 6,500 with 104,000 miles on it. It has 118k now and I have only been getting around 15mpg. My dad just bought a 2008 Silverado with a V-8 for 13,000 and he gets 20-22 mpg hwy.
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 PM.