3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Is there a chance in hell

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 28, 2009 | 04:52 PM
  #41  
derricksmash's Avatar
derricksmash
V6 Ram Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by MarkMark6464
I heard if there were ever a turbo for our v6's they would be hella expensive and would run just under the hemi... Not worth it.
a turbo wouldn't do anything for our engine. the turbo lag wouldn't make anything worth it...unless you wanna go from like 60 to 100 on the highway.
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2009 | 11:58 PM
  #42  
honkytonkkid's Avatar
honkytonkkid
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

so what do you run on the 1/4 mile and on hp after all the mods?
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 05:34 PM
  #43  
derricksmash's Avatar
derricksmash
V6 Ram Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

i ran a 16.2 or something last year. that's before the headers and chip and stuff. i am hoping i am gonna bein the 15's this spring (tracks aren't open right now). and before then i think i am gonna add a torque converter and shift kit to the picture.

but yea, see that thread on front page...it has like 32894879234 time slips on it...
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2009 | 10:43 AM
  #44  
nickahern1's Avatar
nickahern1
Record Breaker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
From: NH
Default

i seriously cannot wait to get gears i should be in low low 15s with gears,tb, headers,efan and cams.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2009 | 09:05 PM
  #45  
BadStratRT's Avatar
BadStratRT
The Forum Tyrant
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 27,728
Likes: 3
From: Puttin' Detroit City back on the map.
Default

i think that if done correctly, a turbo'd V6 wouldnt lag all that badly...but it wouldnt be cost effective unless you got the parts super cheap, and the labor for free.
 
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 04:55 AM
  #46  
derricksmash's Avatar
derricksmash
V6 Ram Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by BadStratRT
i think that if done correctly, a turbo'd V6 wouldnt lag all that badly...but it wouldnt be cost effective unless you got the parts super cheap, and the labor for free.
if done correctly, yea...but correctly entails more than slapping a turbo on. and very cost inneffective...you could prolly buy a supercharged old 440 crate for cheaper...lol
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:29 PM.