LMAO - now why would she?!?!? - I'm just one of the guys around here, 'cept I have a chest
- now I could be a smart allic here and tell ya to ask that one member how he covered up or how he would cover up if or when his fiancee found the pictures of me in his ram and all the pictures and proof I had he'd been talking (at the minimum) to me for the past year after I'm sure he's said he hasnt spoken to me in 19 months minimum...
But I don't think that would be real 'grown up' and may **** that person off...
So, I will say this - which may not be of any help - but I aint a threat to any other female out there - unless they go after my guy - but the feeling is mutual with my bf & guys who are out after me.
K - way OT here...

back on topic - replacing the whole dash - big project, lots of money - not sure its worth it unless u find a steal at a junk yard...

--Cow-Chick--

 

Oh stop! Who'd go after a girl with a nickname like "Cow Chick" anyway???

 

On this forum site... **Maybe** one...

Out side of here... lets not get into that, cause being me, I have lots of people who love me or hate me - there aint but maybe 2 that tolerate me...

--Cow-Chick--

What is this whole thing about, recently whether or not I am input on a thread or not, it comes OT with the topic of me somehow - this is getting amusing y'all really dont got much else to do, do ya? It's cause I'm a girl aint it?

 

Did you ever stop to think that maybe they go OT because YOU take them OT???

 

LOL you guys ever read a topic like 3 or 4 pages or more into a thread and its just completely off what the original topic was lol just noticed that a week or so ago

 

Fox bodies are slow. 200 measley Hp. Ohh, the 4cyl. turbo Mustangs were 205hp and faster than the v8's when properly tuned and dynoed higher than the v8's. Fox bodies dyno at a whopping 160-170rwhp..LMAO They still weigh over 3,000lbs too. The Ram should not be that far behind at all especially since the Ram Dynoes at least 240rwhp but more like 270rwhp. The Ram does weigh 2000-2500lbs more, but the Ram has an additional 100rwhp than the stang.

Also, no offense Lxman, but they are sooooo Fugly no matter which direction the picture is facing. Nothing to them in my eyes resembles anything of a sports car. They look like early 80's Ford escorts, some with extra ground effects and some with v8's. The interiors are attorcious as well. I climbed into my cousins like 3 weeks ago and felt like I was in a strip down bottom barrel Vega. I've never been a fan of the interior. I prefer the early 80's split front lights over the later fronts but I like the later *** ends with the slit taillight covers. Same with the newer one's, they are sooo Fugly without any body molding. When they are fully decked out they are onsweet ride, but no body molding brings me back to the early 80's of Camaro's firbirds and mustangs with no ground effects....(puke)

 

I've taken my dakota to the speed limiter @ 4000 RPM and 95 MPH.

and the miata was in my mirror struggling to keep up. They said they were doing 105 trying to stay on my tail.

(keep in mind, my tires are almost too big for the truck)

 

Well, it definitely ain't no luxury car and that sure isn't the reason that I bought it!!
Mine is old school, pushrods, 16V, etc. , but so am I, so it all works out.
Yes, the Modular engines respond well to boost. It's the only way to make power because the bore centers are so small, that there is no room for larger valves or combustion area.
The new Boss series 6.2L/7L OHC engines fix this problem with a much larger bore center.

Not that 315hp is bad for a 4.6L Mustang (while the 4.7L Ram has 310hp )

Got a Mark VII for that.

 

What the heck are you talking about. He said early 90's Mustang didn't he? Fox bodies include Mustangs from 1979 to 1993. The turbo 4 cylinder Mustang, otherwise known as the SVO Mustang was produced in 1984 and the 200HP number hasn't been around since the mid 80's. 87 - 93 produced around 225HP and that was underrated. I had a 1987 Mustang GT with only a few mods and was running in the 13's in the 1/4. Your facts are skewed and no 5000lb truck with only 15 more HP is going to beat or come close to beating a Mustang GT of any year.. PERIOD!

As far as styling, well, that's completely subjective. If you don't like the looks, so be it. I own a 1973 Mach 1 and a 1998 GT for the record.

 

Really any stang after '75 is fugly IMO. I cant stand the way they look, now the new ones the kinda reverted back to the Hay days of speed and what it meant to have a fast car, theyve grown on me. I have a '67 comin down from Ohio I cnat wait to get my hands on. Ive actually toyed with the idea of *GASP* selling my ram just to throw money at the little beauty.

But Im a d-bag and an a-hole in my truck so its not all stang owners... just cut the muffler off and do some Whiskey tango mods to the body and hell everyone leaves you alone.