3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Advice please- 1500 vs 2500

Old Mar 22, 2009 | 11:36 AM
  #1  
SteveV's Avatar
SteveV
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default Advice please- 1500 vs 2500

Hi all,
I currently own a 07 Sport QC/SB with tow package. Truck is leased and used for business as a daily driver. Most kilometers are highway. I am in talks with my dealer about moving into a 09. My options are another 1500 with the hemi or a 2500 with the CTD. I do occasionally pull a 30' TT in the summer months. Any suggestions on which way to go. Will I get better fuel economy with the Hemi or CTD during regular highway driving? Which should give me better maintenance. I am thinking this will be my last upgrade in a while. I have never owned a Diesel but this will be my 5th Ram since 94'.
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 02:23 PM
  #2  
Trigger's Avatar
Trigger
Professional
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Default

I would HIGHLY recommend the 2500 (gas or diesel) if you are going to do any type of heavy hauling. That 1500 mini-van they came out with for '09 is a joke if you need to haul anything heavier than kids to soccer practice.


Any of you idiots on here that think coils are better than leafs, need to get your head examined!
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 03:10 PM
  #3  
BEAR's Avatar
BEAR
Record Breaker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 0
From: REDNECK, USA
Default

Originally Posted by Trigger


Any of you idiots on here that think coils are better than leafs, need to get your head examined!
Idiots on here? Everybody is entitled to their opinion without being called a IDIOT. I see you are new on here....Trying to make friends are we?
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 03:25 PM
  #4  
HammerZ71's Avatar
HammerZ71
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 21
From: South Georgia/East Florida
Default

Actually, if you take out the attitude & insults, he's not too far offline Bear. I've been in an '09 that we used to haul a trailer with a new Kubota and box blade. I don't know the total weight, but I'm guessing it had to be close to 9000 lbs.
The coil rears really did not make for a stable ride, and sag!!! Bags wouldn't have been nice, they should have been needed.
We used an '03 Furd F150 to trailer it back, 120 HP less, 85 ft/lbs torque less, and towed so much better it wasn't funny, and you guys know damn well I'm a Furd hater!!!
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 03:28 PM
  #5  
BEAR's Avatar
BEAR
Record Breaker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 0
From: REDNECK, USA
Default

aaahight Hammer... I feel the love man but the only thing I quoted was the attitude and insults...other than that I agree
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 03:42 PM
  #6  
Alpheus's Avatar
Alpheus
Banned
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk,Va
Default

Wait for the 2010 2500. Wait for it...
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 04:11 PM
  #7  
Trigger's Avatar
Trigger
Professional
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Default

Originally Posted by BEAR
Idiots on here? Everybody is entitled to their opinion without being called a IDIOT. I see you are new on here....Trying to make friends are we?

Sorry. I was expecting people to weird out and start arguing how much BETTER the coils were.

IMHO I think Dodge totally missed the target with the 09 1500. They put this monster V8 up front (Kudos) with a *****-*** rear end behind it(pun intended).

Wait for the 2010 2500. Wait for it...
We'll see. According to reports, it seems Dodge is finally ready to play hardball with Ford in the heavy duty truck segment.
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 04:23 PM
  #8  
Got_Hemi44's Avatar
Got_Hemi44
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Trigger
I would HIGHLY recommend the 2500 (gas or diesel) if you are going to do any type of heavy hauling. That 1500 mini-van they came out with for '09 is a joke if you need to haul anything heavier than kids to soccer practice.


Any of you idiots on here that think coils are better than leafs, need to get your head examined!
The 09 Ram 1500s aren't designed to be like conventional trucks. The 09 1500s are for people who want a truck, but never haul anything. Dodge played it out perfect. They rely on comfort, power, and the good lines to sell their truck. You think people only buy trucks to haul stuff? I couldn't care less about how much weight i can put in my bed or how big a trailer i can pull. Why put leaf springs if it's not designed for loading weight. That the same as when people ask why doesn't the SRT10 come in 4wd. If you want a work truck, then get a 2500 or 3500. That's why they make them
 

Last edited by Got_Hemi44; Mar 22, 2009 at 04:25 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 05:03 PM
  #9  
Wanderer's Avatar
Wanderer
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Northern New Jersey
Default

Back to SteveV's question. The oil burner will get you better mileage, much better mileage when towing. What you have to consider for the additional cost is how you will use the truck. Is the towing infrequent or some serious travels during the summer. A diesel needs to be fully heated before it starts running efficiently (the better mpg) and then there is the ability to heat the engine during the winter. Cumming's technical sheets show the full warm-up can be approximately 25 minutes. Ford had a cost analysis available some years back that showed the break-even point strictly on cost was in the 120-140,000 mile range. The 2500 has a stronger chasis and a much stronger transmission on the diesel.
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 06:47 PM
  #10  
Redone4x4's Avatar
Redone4x4
Record Breaker
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

i would definitely get the 2500. I have convinced myself that this is pretty much the last 1/2 ton truck for me. and if you can afford the CTD, then by all means i would do it.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 AM.