3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

intake?? not wich one...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-03-2009, 09:01 PM
draco8494's Avatar
draco8494
draco8494 is offline
Captain
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Inverness
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default intake?? not wich one...

ok so i made my own pvc intake a while ago, i havent been driving the truck since but today i drove it about 250 miles and it seems to have more top end but not a whole lotta bottom end like b4? i switched from a 2.5" aluminum egay intake to a 4" pvc with a AEM dryflow filter.. any insight? would a smaller intake yeild better velocity for low rpm torque?
 
  #2  
Old 08-04-2009, 07:58 PM
draco8494's Avatar
draco8494
draco8494 is offline
Captain
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Inverness
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

no takes?
 
  #3  
Old 08-04-2009, 08:56 PM
chambers's Avatar
chambers
chambers is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 1,605
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'll bite, there is a guy on dodge talk who slapped one of the ebay specials w/ the pencil dick tube on his truck and he said it felt like it was actually hurting performance. I haven't tried both so I'm just speculating here, but even that stock accordion tube is bigger than 2.5" and the mopar/AEM is 3.5" and that is dyno proven for gains. I don't know if 4 inches is too big or what, but I have the spectre which is a mopar clone on my 3.7 ram and I noticed a similar bump in the powerband up to the higher rpms w/ it vs. the stock setup. I think you'll get used to it and find that you like the way it pulls w/ the pvc better than the ebay one.
 
  #4  
Old 08-04-2009, 09:22 PM
draco8494's Avatar
draco8494
draco8494 is offline
Captain
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Inverness
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah, i might clean out the filter, and my tranny is due for a service might help out with the slugishness at the bottom end, and i think a tunner would make it run a helluva lot better, might settle for a power wire and see what happens , i was just wondering if any1 els had any experience with a 4" intake and the bottom end loss
 
  #5  
Old 08-05-2009, 12:37 AM
SeVeReDiStOrTiOn's Avatar
SeVeReDiStOrTiOn
SeVeReDiStOrTiOn is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by draco8494
yeah, i might clean out the filter, and my tranny is due for a service might help out with the slugishness at the bottom end, and i think a tunner would make it run a helluva lot better, might settle for a power wire and see what happens , i was just wondering if any1 els had any experience with a 4" intake and the bottom end loss
Don't buy a power wire...put a resistor (4.7k I think..there's a write up somewhere) inline with the IAT and it's the same thing.

For the intake i'm not sure why the powerband would have shifted from just a CAI....did you do any exhaust mods at the same time?
 
  #6  
Old 08-05-2009, 07:16 AM
draco8494's Avatar
draco8494
draco8494 is offline
Captain
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Inverness
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nope i just got a FM40 single in dual 2.5 out but thats been on there like 2 weeks after i bought it used to be able to burn em all the way threw an intersection with out even braking a sweat, now it barely chirps em, but has ALOT of pull after like 3800, i like and would rather have the low end grunt, help alot more with them there MPG's lol
 



Quick Reply: intake?? not wich one...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:02 PM.