3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

What's your MPG average?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 09:36 AM
  #11  
RubberFrog's Avatar
RubberFrog
Champion
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,687
Likes: 0
From: Northern Virginia
Default

13 mpg
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 09:57 AM
  #12  
dirtydog's Avatar
dirtydog
Moderate User
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 17,003
Likes: 21
From: Albany, NY
Default

Originally Posted by RubberFrog
13 mpg

not too shabby for a 9" lift, some oversized tires and a lead foot
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 10:00 AM
  #13  
weedahoe's Avatar
weedahoe
Hall Of Fame
Hall of Fame Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 19,168
Likes: 23
From: South GA
Default

I usually avg around 12 or so
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 10:01 AM
  #14  
Off_Road_Teacher's Avatar
Off_Road_Teacher
Banned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,759
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by bleepo
11 on the overhead. I haven't done the math yet, she's on her 3rd tank.
Do it by hand, you are never going to get an accurate number from the overhead.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 10:37 AM
  #15  
RubberFrog's Avatar
RubberFrog
Champion
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,687
Likes: 0
From: Northern Virginia
Default

It's just not the same doing it by hand,
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 11:22 AM
  #16  
weedahoe's Avatar
weedahoe
Hall Of Fame
Hall of Fame Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 19,168
Likes: 23
From: South GA
Default

But hell, your guys with your mini 4.7s get good MPGs. Trade off is power and speed. Thats why I ddint get one.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 11:33 AM
  #17  
V10Venom's Avatar
V10Venom
Captain
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
From: Imlay City, MI
Default

Originally Posted by RubberFrog
It's just not the same doing it by hand,
I agree, overhead is so much better. You can just sit there and it will give it to you.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 11:34 AM
  #18  
V10Venom's Avatar
V10Venom
Captain
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
From: Imlay City, MI
Default

Originally Posted by weedahoe
But hell, your guys with your mini 4.7s get good MPGs. Trade off is power and speed. Thats why I ddint get one.
I disagree, I think they're about the same. I think the only thing about the 4.7's is a lot of them are Regular cab 2wds so they seem like they get better. I've been right on part with most hemi owners with my qc 4x4 with the 4.7.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 05:15 PM
  #19  
RawRam2006's Avatar
RawRam2006
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 467
Likes: 1
From: Burleson, TX
Default

I was gonna trade my "mini 4.7" in for an 08' QC Hemi. I was thinking that that "MDS" thingy might help on gas mileage on the highway. But from what I'm seeing, the 5.7's don't have as good gas mileage. But, yes, the trade off is power and speed.
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2009 | 01:06 PM
  #20  
akpwrwgn's Avatar
akpwrwgn
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

I have a Power Wagon and am getting a tad over 13.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:47 AM.