3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

is a cam worth it? if so, which one?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 10, 2012 | 02:22 PM
  #11  
Izero's Avatar
Izero
Champion
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,489
Likes: 4
From: New Jersey
Default

Well I did a TC on a GM for my old man like 5 yrs ago... made it hook-up and haul ***... Nice set of tire marks were made effortless....

Down side was snow driving and wet driving when the tires started to wear out... it didn't like to limit the torque output... and sometimes taking off from a stop when it's slippery was tricky b/c it had a higher stall point...
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2012 | 02:53 PM
  #12  
HemiLonestar's Avatar
HemiLonestar
Banned
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,739
Likes: 8
From: MD
Default

I had my choices down to Circle D 2800 or Edge 2800...Circle D won because I got a helluva discount. Both recommended no more than 2800 stall for me because I still use my truck as a truck, hauling and towing. Big difference. Feels like more power is getting to the back end. Complements the 4.56's nicely and will do well with the 260 I'll eventually get around to putting in.
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2012 | 02:59 PM
  #13  
Ryan Dunbar's Avatar
Ryan Dunbar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HemiLonestar
I had my choices down to Circle D 2800 or Edge 2800...Circle D won because I got a helluva discount. Both recommended no more than 2800 stall for me because I still use my truck as a truck, hauling and towing. Big difference. Feels like more power is getting to the back end. Complements the 4.56's nicely and will do well with the 260 I'll eventually get around to putting in.
what's the upside for such a high stall?
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2012 | 04:00 PM
  #14  
Izero's Avatar
Izero
Champion
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,489
Likes: 4
From: New Jersey
Default

Read this:

http://www.jegs.com/s/tech-articles/...rque+Converter

It's more suited to racing but it will give you the basics to understand the system.

I think a 280* Cam might be better for Street Use... specially if you're gonna do gears too....
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2012 | 10:15 PM
  #15  
HemiLonestar's Avatar
HemiLonestar
Banned
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,739
Likes: 8
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by Izero
Read this:

http://www.jegs.com/s/tech-articles/...rque+Converter

It's more suited to racing but it will give you the basics to understand the system.

I think a 280* Cam might be better for Street Use... specially if you're gonna do gears too....
He won't be able to tune it properly...260 is a better all around torque cam.

Originally Posted by Ryan Dunbar
what's the upside for such a high stall?
Not actually all that high. If I had a 2005, could custom tune to my hearts content and didn't tow or anything, I could really throw a cam in like a 273 or something custom with a 3000-3200 rpm stall.
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2012 | 09:04 AM
  #16  
Izero's Avatar
Izero
Champion
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,489
Likes: 4
From: New Jersey
Default

There are ways around the "tuning" problem.... the only issues he'll run into is the idle control... which really isn't that hard if you have a tuner that allows you to rewrite fuel, timing (A MUST WITH CAMS), and idle tables... downside to a 280* cam is that he'll have to increase the idle a bit so that the minimum lope will be a little higher than the lowest idle speed that would cause a stall.

I'd have to dig into the tables on these trucks to really see what's possible, but I've messed with some pretty difficult cars and trucks before to work around OEM limitations.
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2012 | 12:50 PM
  #17  
SLT8's Avatar
SLT8
Record Breaker
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Default

273 is retarded so much you can prob' run it on a canned tune. Actually a member on DT ran a 273 on a sc 91 tune. I think it was a hefty 4x4 qc night runner

Originally Posted by HemiLonestar
He won't be able to tune it properly...260 is a better all around torque cam.



Not actually all that high. If I had a 2005, could custom tune to my hearts content and didn't tow or anything, I could really throw a cam in like a 273 or something custom with a 3000-3200 rpm stall.
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2012 | 10:05 AM
  #18  
weedahoe's Avatar
weedahoe
Hall Of Fame
Hall of Fame Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 19,168
Likes: 23
From: South GA
Default

I dont think Ive seen any 03s with big long duration cams.
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2012 | 05:58 PM
  #19  
HemiLonestar's Avatar
HemiLonestar
Banned
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,739
Likes: 8
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by SLT8
273 is retarded so much you can prob' run it on a canned tune. Actually a member on DT ran a 273 on a sc 91 tune. I think it was a hefty 4x4 qc night runner
Probably didn't run well...or wasn't a 2003
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58 AM.