3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Flex Fuel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 01:11 PM
  #1  
fire10's Avatar
fire10
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From:
Default Flex Fuel

Starting to see more about this on T.V. ads
Anyone have any info??
Are the 3rd gen Rams set up for it?
Thanks for your input
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 01:32 PM
  #2  
CarGuyOhio's Avatar
CarGuyOhio
Admin formally known as 94rt10ohio
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 9,025
Likes: 3
From: Curtice, OH
Default RE: Flex Fuel

Corn/Ethanol.

This explains it a little.

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/flextech.shtml/

To answer your question I do not think so. GM is leading the way on this one.
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 05:27 PM
  #3  
Gone Fishin's Avatar
Gone Fishin
Record Breaker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,309
Likes: 1
From: Bristol, IN
Default RE: Flex Fuel

Isn't this the E-85 you're talking about, or is this something different. I do believe that D/M has this available for the 4.7, but not the 5.7. I asked my dealer several months ago about it. He called D/M and they said no to the 5.7, and had no plans of ever making the 5.7 available with it. I wish we could run straight Ethanol!!! Even though its not as good as Gas, with the 5.7, already plenty of engine there for power.
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 10:58 PM
  #4  
osteodoc08's Avatar
osteodoc08
Record Breaker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,192
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Flex Fuel

I was under the assumption (Yeah, I know, we all know what happens when we ASSUME) that most non performance engines can run on the E85. As far as I know, all the vehicles I've ever had and my family's, with the exception of the Hemi, could be run on E-85. That includes an Explorer, Expedition, Sonoma, Taurus, Windstar, and a few others. It is definitely for performance as it doesn't have the same energy potential that gasoline does, however, it burns cleaner and typically costs less.

If anyone is interested in green running, check out Abarmby's (sp?) post on converting the Hemi to LPG. Very interesting stuff.
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2006 | 02:07 AM
  #5  
kniteraven's Avatar
kniteraven
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Flex Fuel

E-85 is is not very easy to find right now, in Illinois anyway. It is a much cleaner fuel, but the cost is not cheaper as many people believe. The Chicago Sun Times printed an article from a study done by a magazine (can't remember which mag, but it was along the lines of Consumer Reports) that used the Chevy Monte Carlo as their test cars. The car using E-85 fuel test car actually got worse mileage than the traditional gasoline test car. The cost was also more for the E-85, the article estimated about $3500 extra per year. I will try to find the the edition of the Times it was printed and post it.
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2006 | 11:56 AM
  #6  
osteodoc08's Avatar
osteodoc08
Record Breaker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,192
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Flex Fuel

Yes, the gas mileage is typically worse because the E-85 doesn't have the power potential good 'ole gas has. It does, however, burn cleaner and lets off less emissions and is thus considered "green." I don't think I have ever seen E-85 at a regular gas station and if I did, it would probably be more expensive. I do see bio-diesel and most of our city transit buses run off of it.

 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 PM.