4th Gen RAM general discussion/NON-tech This section is for general discussions about your 4th gen RAM. Non tech related RAM threads belong here.

Ford Ecoboost Vs Ram & Chevy

Old Dec 13, 2010 | 11:39 AM
  #1  
Pedro Dog's Avatar
Pedro Dog
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 5
From: San Pedro, California
Default Ford Ecoboost Vs Ram & Chevy

Motor trend did some testing. Here is the article and the Ford is very impressive. Look at the MPG for the Ford and it still bet the Ram and Chevy in towing!

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...slt/index.html
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2010 | 11:50 AM
  #2  
OneSickHemiRam's Avatar
OneSickHemiRam
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: South, FL
Default

Amazing what a turbo can do to efficiency.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2010 | 04:23 PM
  #3  
1954Radio's Avatar
1954Radio
Captain
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 731
Likes: 1
From: Louisiana
Default

It's still a turbo charged engine, they should compare a non aspirated truck with the same same. Not to mention...I don't believe this BS to be non biased anyway...who's to say this guy who tallied the results doesn't drive a Ford? Screw Ford, he he! I can't wait to run across one of those big mouth eco boost turbos with my truck... lol!
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2010 | 04:29 PM
  #4  
NumberCruncher's Avatar
NumberCruncher
Amateur
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Default

Let's also remember that the Ford beat the Dodge from 0-60 by 12 seconds but after the 3.5 mile uphill run the Ford was only ahead by 3.2 seconds. Sounds to me like the Dodge was actually faster once up and running. The Ford has a much lower 1s through 3rd gear and allows the F-150 to get a big jump on both the Ram and Chevy. Also, the Chevy only had the 5.3 liter engine. If I am going to be pulling 9,000 pounds with a gas Chevy it would be the 6.2 liter. That would have levelled the playing field.

Still it is great to see Ford putting down strong numbers from a turbo V6. I wonder how their new 5.0 would have done against the Ram? I am still trying to decide between the two vehicles and leaning toward the Ram right now.

NC
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2010 | 04:38 PM
  #5  
1954Radio's Avatar
1954Radio
Captain
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 731
Likes: 1
From: Louisiana
Default

It's a lie...I refuse to believe it..I guess I'll have t go beat up on my nefews to prove it, lol!
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2010 | 04:40 PM
  #6  
Powerubi Wacon's Avatar
Powerubi Wacon
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From:
Default

I test drove the new 2011 F-150, with the 3.5L V6 EcoBoost and 5.0L & 6.2L V8s. These new Fords Rock. I had a chance to pull a 6,500 pound enclosed trailer with the EcoBoost F-150...it will out accelerate my 2005 Ram 2500 with a 5.7L V8 (4.56 gears) pulling my 5,000 pound travel trailer! This is a 3.5L V6 vs. a 5.7L V8. The new 6.2L Ford would do even better I am sure.

Do not discredit the new 2011 F-150.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2010 | 05:20 PM
  #7  
Pedro Dog's Avatar
Pedro Dog
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 5
From: San Pedro, California
Default I'm a Ram guy but the Ford MPGs look inviting

The Ford had 3.73 axle and the Ram a 3.92 and still got beat. I'll stick with my Ram but if gas goes back up to over $4 a gallon, the Fords 19 city/26 Hwy estimated economy will get my attention. I only tow a few times a year so the car like MPGs the rest of the time are an eye opener. I'll wait to see what Dodge does to counter Ford and in a few years if the Ford holds up.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2010 | 05:48 PM
  #8  
NumberCruncher's Avatar
NumberCruncher
Amateur
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Pedro Dog
The Ford had 3.73 axle and the Ram a 3.92 and still got beat. I'll stick with my Ram but if gas goes back up to over $4 a gallon, the Fords 19 city/26 Hwy estimated economy will get my attention. I only tow a few times a year so the car like MPGs the rest of the time are an eye opener. I'll wait to see what Dodge does to counter Ford and in a few years if the Ford holds up.

Have those MPG numbers been confirmed? HOw are they getting better fuel economy than what they get in the Ford Ranger on a truck that is 1,500 pounds heavier? Or the Toyota Tacoma V6, or the Nissan Frontier V6, etc?

If those numbers have not been confirmed, I expect a 1 mpg improvement over the 5.0 on the highway and maybe 2 in the city.

NC
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2010 | 05:59 PM
  #9  
HEMI_ROM's Avatar
HEMI_ROM
Captain
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 626
Likes: 1
From: Colorado Springs
Default

Yawn.......I am not impressed, unable to compete HP/CID with the Hemi Ram Ford had to put a turbo on a six banger and threw cubic inches into the 6.2L. Its painfully obvious the 5.4L was never going to cut it and all the 2011 F-150's are still going to see is the big emblem on my tailgate...... the same view all previous generation Fords have been enjoying
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2010 | 06:00 PM
  #10  
1954Radio's Avatar
1954Radio
Captain
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 731
Likes: 1
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by Powerubi Wacon
I test drove the new 2011 F-150, with the 3.5L V6 EcoBoost and 5.0L & 6.2L V8s. These new Fords Rock. I had a chance to pull a 6,500 pound enclosed trailer with the EcoBoost F-150...it will out accelerate my 2005 Ram 2500 with a 5.7L V8 (4.56 gears) pulling my 5,000 pound travel trailer! This is a 3.5L V6 vs. a 5.7L V8. The new 6.2L Ford would do even better I am sure.

Do not discredit the new 2011 F-150.
First of all...like I said, it's turbo charged, second your truck is an 05 and slower than a 4'th gen Hemi, and last...it's faster than your truck...not mine, lol!
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:42 AM.