4th Gen Ram Tech 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

What's 2 mpg worth to you?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 04-22-2009, 02:36 PM
Inbred's Avatar
Inbred
Inbred is offline
Professional
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The car makers are in cahoots with big oil, man. That's why they don't use super advanced technology like this. The government is owned by big oil too, man, so this guy will never get a patent. Heck, I'd be surprised if he's still alive in a few weeks. Big Oil, automakers, and the government will conspire to make this guy disappear, man, just like they did everyone else who wanted to change the status quo.
 
  #12  
Old 04-22-2009, 03:18 PM
Doc Fluty's Avatar
Doc Fluty
Doc Fluty is offline
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mike2810
How many years to get to 100K? 10 years = $200/year savings (less than $17/month), 5 years = $400 savings. You can do just anything with statistics to try and prove a point. If mpg was critical I would not have purchased a truck. Would I like to see better mileage, you bet. Most after market mpg devices that have come out have been debunked. If it really works and is practical to produce, you would think some car manufactor would use it in the near future. The pressure is on to produce higher fleet mpg.
soo.. back to the question.. if you kept your truck for 5 years and save $400 a year in gas... how much is that worth to you?

I own a business... and if i had 10 trucks and could save $400 a year in gas for 5 years based on a one time purchase of $3500 ($350 x 10 trucks)... i would jump on it.

that would save me over $23,000 in gas in just 5 years

besides the calcualtions were base donly on $2.25 and $3.00 a gallon gas... if gas hit $4-$5 again the saving would be a lot more

$4 a gallon x 16 mpg x 100,000 miles = $25,000 / 5 years equals $5000 a year
$4 a gallon x 18 mpg x 100,000 miles = $22,222 / 5 years equals $4400 a year - saves $600 a year x 5 years $3000
$5 a gallon x 16 mpg x 100,000 miles = $31,250 / 5 years equals $6250 a year
$5 a gallon x 18 mpg x 100,000 miles = $27,777 / 5 years equals $5500 a year - saves $750 a year x 5 years $3700

so if i could buy something that could save me $3700 in fuel cost for each truck... say i own 20 trucks... that saves me $74,000 in fuel cost over 5 years... yeah.. thats a nice invesment for $5000 or so
 

Last edited by Doc Fluty; 04-22-2009 at 03:33 PM.
  #13  
Old 04-22-2009, 03:37 PM
Doc Fluty's Avatar
Doc Fluty
Doc Fluty is offline
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Inbred
The car makers are in cahoots with big oil, man. That's why they don't use super advanced technology like this. The government is owned by big oil too, man, so this guy will never get a patent. Heck, I'd be surprised if he's still alive in a few weeks. Big Oil, automakers, and the government will conspire to make this guy disappear, man, just like they did everyone else who wanted to change the status quo.
this makes no sense....

1. if chevy could make a truck that is capable of being a truck and getting 30 mpg.. they would own the market and rule the truck world. since they cant they are about to go backrupt.s o whoever they are in cahoots with... they are not helping them

2. if the low mpg market goes bye bye then the oil companies lose money cause everyone is using less gas.... so it would be oil companies best interest if everyone was driving a hummer
 
  #14  
Old 04-22-2009, 03:41 PM
Soop's Avatar
Soop
Soop is offline
Professional
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southeast Ohio
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2 mpg is important...but what's more important is climbing in my Ram and it starts right up; everything working; comfort plus a lot of room; 4x4; power; did I mention it starting up when I am ready to rumble!!!

I will sacrifice mpg for all the above...thats why I got the HEMI Crew Cab 4x4!

Of course, an extra 2 mpgs would be a nice addition!
 
  #15  
Old 04-22-2009, 04:05 PM
mike2810's Avatar
mike2810
mike2810 is offline
Captain
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: AZ
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Inbred
The car makers are in cahoots with big oil, man. That's why they don't use super advanced technology like this. The government is owned by big oil too, man, so this guy will never get a patent. Heck, I'd be surprised if he's still alive in a few weeks. Big Oil, automakers, and the government will conspire to make this guy disappear, man, just like they did everyone else who wanted to change the status quo.
Hope you were being sarcastic about another myth? So all car manufacturers throughout the world are in with big oil and big oil own all government's? Hope this invention works out and will be low costs. However there have been many "inventions", like magnets, water hydrolysis, air flow modifications that all said they had "scientific" proof that the item worked. They all have been debunked so far. I'll take a wait and see approach on this one.
 
  #16  
Old 04-22-2009, 04:23 PM
70GS455's Avatar
70GS455
70GS455 is offline
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's probably a brown's gas generator or hydrogen bubbled from water.
 
  #17  
Old 04-22-2009, 04:50 PM
JINXR's Avatar
JINXR
JINXR is offline
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, say you put this on a truck that gets 15 mpg and it bumps it up to 17 mpg and it costs $350. It's going to take 22,500 miles before it pays for itself. That's not such a great investment in my book. In fact, I think too many people focus on small gains in MPG, when in the long run, it's really not that much money that you're losing. That's my opinion at least.

Check out this calculator I made... If anyone wants a copy, PM me your email address and I'll send it to you.

Name:  2mpg.jpg
Views: 52
Size:  81.0 KB
 
  #18  
Old 04-22-2009, 06:07 PM
hutch1973's Avatar
hutch1973
hutch1973 is offline
Captain
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Green Bay WI
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am curious what the technology is first. If it doesn't affect performance at all, I might think about it for my truck, but again, 2mpg isn't a big deal to me. I currently put on 3k a year, and in 2 years, that'll drop in half again. Generally don't remember the last time I got gas...

Now my company trucks, at 30k each a year, I'd put it on regardless immediately. Any competitive edge in biz is a good thing, and I could see a payback in a short amount of time.

To the crackpot rant about big oil/biz...blah. It shows you more about how little innovation has been really made in the world of autos regarding mileage. When my 69 F100 4x4 with a 390 got 12mpg city, and my Ram 3 decades newer wasn't significantly better, come on.

Does have 4 cupholders though....guess it's a wash.
 
  #19  
Old 04-22-2009, 07:13 PM
SubRammer's Avatar
SubRammer
SubRammer is offline
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I dunno, I would say an EPA estimate 13/18 mpg with people regularly getting better than that on a 5500lb truck making 390HP is a significant mileage improvement over your '69 F100 making probly little more than 210HP. Just imagine if the V6 or 4.7L had all of the tech our HEMI's do their gas mileage would be through the roof, but they would cost the same as or close to the HEMI so its not economically feasible. In all i think the auto manufactures have done fairly well to try and meet the unrealist american demand of enormous vehicles that make lots of power and still get good mpg.
 
  #20  
Old 04-22-2009, 07:50 PM
hutch1973's Avatar
hutch1973
hutch1973 is offline
Captain
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Green Bay WI
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SubRammer
I dunno, I would say an EPA estimate 13/18 mpg with people regularly getting better than that on a 5500lb truck making 390HP is a significant mileage improvement over your '69 F100 making probly little more than 210HP. Just imagine if the V6 or 4.7L had all of the tech our HEMI's do their gas mileage would be through the roof, but they would cost the same as or close to the HEMI so its not economically feasible. In all i think the auto manufactures have done fairly well to try and meet the unrealist american demand of enormous vehicles that make lots of power and still get good mpg.
lol..seriously? Perhaps you missed the fact that I have an 01, which sure as hell isn't anywhere close to 390 HP. Also don't care enough to list the mods to my old truck, because I've already stated, I don't care about mileage on my truck. It was bought to make runs to Home Depot for remodeling supplies.

Just a comment that I'm surprised at how little has been done to improve mileage over 30 years. If the answer is you can't push a 3 ton vehicle without sucking gas, so be it. Just think we could do better.

I might be more negative then most, but I work in engineering, and am constantly amazed at the idiocy of engineers. While I'm not in the automotive industry, I have been involved in enough industries to understand this is not uncommon.
 


Quick Reply: What's 2 mpg worth to you?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:16 AM.