4th Gen Ram Tech 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Towing RPM

Old Apr 13, 2010 | 10:45 AM
  #1  
thirtydaZe's Avatar
thirtydaZe
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Default Towing RPM

Was towing my boat down the hwy last night for the first time. total weight is probably right around 5900lbs with a full tank of gas.

My CC with a Hemi and 3.92's was pulling on the way to the lake with the wind about 75mph and running about 2300 RPM.

On the way home going straight into a 15+ MPH wind was doing about 70mph and the truck was down shifted and running 3000 RPM.

Just wondering if this is all good or if the truck should have up shifted itself.

BTW I was in Tow/Haul mode.

What are your experiences?
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 10:47 AM
  #2  
oldjeep's Avatar
oldjeep
Champion
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,497
Likes: 1
From: MN
Default

Sounds normal
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 11:01 AM
  #3  
05Dakotaho's Avatar
05Dakotaho
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by thirtydaZe

My CC with a Hemi and 3.92's was pulling on the way to the lake with the wind about 75mph and running about 2300 RPM.

**You were in 4th gear

On the way home going straight into a 15+ MPH wind was doing about 70mph and the truck was down shifted and running 3000 RPM.

**You were in 3rd gear
Just an FYI

Based on your experience, I'm convinced that 4:10 ratio is the way to go with these rigs for towing over 3,000lbs.

My experience on the 05 Dakota with 4.10's shows only a slight reduction (5%) in highway NON-TOWING MPG compared to the original 3.92's

...but a huge improvement when towing over 3,000lbs. The Dak with a 4.7 seldom shifts out of 5th and rarely downshifts to third.
 

Last edited by 05Dakotaho; Apr 13, 2010 at 11:10 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 12:19 PM
  #4  
thirtydaZe's Avatar
thirtydaZe
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 05Dakotaho
Just an FYI

Based on your experience, I'm convinced that 4:10 ratio is the way to go with these rigs for towing over 3,000lbs.

My experience on the 05 Dakota with 4.10's shows only a slight reduction (5%) in highway NON-TOWING MPG compared to the original 3.92's

...but a huge improvement when towing over 3,000lbs. The Dak with a 4.7 seldom shifts out of 5th and rarely downshifts to third.

so just out of curiosity, how far would you drive with the truck pulling in third gear like that?
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 01:29 PM
  #5  
05Dakotaho's Avatar
05Dakotaho
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by thirtydaZe
so just out of curiosity, how far would you drive with the truck pulling in third gear like that?
As long as the temps remain normal (coolant, engine oil, tranny oil) but I don't like the following while remaining in 3rd gear:

Poor MPG
Noise when Mechanical fan clutch engages to prevent overtemp
Increased wear on engine at 3,000rpm

I haven't towed my RV with the Ram yet and since it has a 32gal tank, those long stretches on I-10 in west TX with no gas stops won't pose the problem that the Dak with a 20gal tank did, so the economy issue becomes somewhat moot I suppose.

Maybe I'm asking too much for a "dinky" little 5.7 liter with 390HP to tow a 4,200 lb trailer consistently under 2500rpm...

but I don't think so.
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 01:56 PM
  #6  
thirtydaZe's Avatar
thirtydaZe
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 05Dakotaho
As long as the temps remain normal (coolant, engine oil, tranny oil) but I don't like the following while remaining in 3rd gear:

Poor MPG
Noise when Mechanical fan clutch engages to prevent overtemp
Increased wear on engine at 3,000rpm

I haven't towed my RV with the Ram yet and since it has a 32gal tank, those long stretches on I-10 in west TX with no gas stops won't pose the problem that the Dak with a 20gal tank did, so the economy issue becomes somewhat moot I suppose.

Maybe I'm asking too much for a "dinky" little 5.7 liter with 390HP to tow a 4,200 lb trailer consistently under 2500rpm...

but I don't think so.
im with you here man, i was a bit surprised.
i could literally watch my gas gauge drain.

obviously the wind was the issue, but ****, it's always windy in NE!
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 08:54 PM
  #7  
Pedro Dog's Avatar
Pedro Dog
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 5
From: San Pedro, California
Default Effective gear ratio

Here is the effective gear ratio for a truck with 17' tires.

So in third gear, a 3.21 axle has a better effective ratio (3.21) than 3.92 in 4th (2.94). I expect a lot of controversy here but I am just having fun with numbers.

The problem in towing with the Ram is the distance between the transmission ratios. So dropping from 4th to 3rd with the 3.92 means RPMs.

With a 4.10 in 4th the effective gear ratio is 3.08 so you may be able to do 70 in winds at lower RPM.

Attachment 8360
 

Last edited by Pedro Dog; Jul 29, 2010 at 08:02 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 06:57 AM
  #8  
Rentsch24's Avatar
Rentsch24
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

you can't get 4.10's on a 1500 model, i don't think so at least

it's 3.92's with LSD.... are you using the ERS on the shifter? elec range select?
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 05:26 PM
  #9  
Revo's Avatar
Revo
Professional
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

You are totally discounting the amount of wind drag that your trailer has. If you have a head wind, it's going to totally kill your mileage and put some heavy load on at 70mph.

Not to mention that the Hemi's produce better power when revved up.

Tow/Haul mode also changes the truck's shifting logic, making it downshift a little early so you aren't down on power.

I can't believe you guys are worrying so much about a little RPM. Yeah, it's a bit more wear, but I honestly doubt you can tell unless you run the engine until it dies from compression loss - and then it might cost you a few thousand miles of engine life before the rebuild - big deal.

To be honest some times you are better off doing a little more RPM with less throttle input than less RPM with more throttle input.

All the above said, the gear ratios on this truck suck - it needs a 6 speed (or, though unprecedented on a truck, a 7 speed). This is my only complaint at all about the truck. Give it a good 6/7 speed with some good ratios, and we wouldn't need all this BS about different diff ratios.
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 06:09 PM
  #10  
05Dakotaho's Avatar
05Dakotaho
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Revo

Not to mention that the Hemi's produce better power when revved up.
That is exactly what we are bitching about.

In a TRUCK, a 5.7 oughta put out better than a 4.7 in the 2200rpm and below range.

IT DOES NOT. IT PUTS OUT LESS.

The low end torque and HP are sacrificed for drivers that want to boast about going 140mph or clocking a 13 second 1/4 mile.
 

Last edited by 05Dakotaho; Apr 14, 2010 at 06:13 PM.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 AM.