Audio/Visual Electronics Wired up? Everyone's got some sort of electrical modification. Let's hear about it here.

IPOd: nano or classic (flash vs disc) for auto use

  #1  
Old 03-19-2010, 02:48 PM
tdister's Avatar
tdister
tdister is offline
Professional
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Austin Tx/North Cali
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default IPOd: nano or classic (flash vs disc) for auto use

I want to install an Ipod behind the dash in my Dakota, using the headunit to control it (USB port in back of head unit).

In deciding between a Nano or Classic, neither storage capacity or physical size are the issues. I am just wondering if one has a serious advantage for mobile use. As I understand it, the flash drive of the nano is a bit more susceptible to heat, while be more resistant to shock.

I will secure the ipod in place, but it will still be jolted by bumps. Not sure how long a classic would tolerate this.

Also, is the classic going to lag or anything? My headunit has "full speed" usb, I don't want to have it slowed down by the ipod.

I already have a 5th gen 16GB nano with all of it's fanciness. This next one doens't need to have tons of extras or be tiny. Opinions? thanks
 


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: IPOd: nano or classic (flash vs disc) for auto use



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:43 PM.