SEMA '07: Barracuda
#1
10-30-2007 | 05:42 PM
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From:
SEMA '07: Barracuda
http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/29/s...ler-barracuda/
It looks a little off to me. Almost like it's based off the current LX
It looks a little off to me. Almost like it's based off the current LX
#5
10-31-2007 | 12:13 AM
Noob Assassin
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,439
Likes: 0
#6
10-31-2007 | 03:24 PM
Rookie
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
#7
10-31-2007 | 03:28 PM
Noob Assassin
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,439
Likes: 0
RE: SEMA '07: Barracuda
ORIGINAL: Kingelvis
Yes - the wheel arches and rear quarter/c pillarare totally 67 Camaro - that's an extremely importantdifference.Can't figure why they didn't just copy it more directly since that's the whole point of this car.
Yes - the wheel arches and rear quarter/c pillarare totally 67 Camaro - that's an extremely importantdifference.Can't figure why they didn't just copy it more directly since that's the whole point of this car.
Trending Topics
#8
10-31-2007 | 03:54 PM
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 1
RE: SEMA '07: Barracuda
The wheel arches blow. Why they did that I'll never know but they screw up the whole look of the car. Smooth them out and they've got a winner. For you guys hoping for a 'Cuda, forget it unless you want to drop another $20K on a body kit and all the related body work and paint involved to make a Challenger a 'Cuda.
I'll take a plain old Challenger. Much more classy IMHO.
I'll take a plain old Challenger. Much more classy IMHO.
#9
10-31-2007 | 04:01 PM
Noob Assassin
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,439
Likes: 0
RE: SEMA '07: Barracuda
ORIGINAL: deranged
The wheel arches blow. Why they did that I'll never know but they screw up the whole look of the car. Smooth them out and they've got a winner. For you guys hoping for a 'Cuda, forget it unless you want to drop another $20K on a body kit and all the related body work and paint involved to make a Challenger a 'Cuda.
I'll take a plain old Challenger. Much more classy IMHO.
The wheel arches blow. Why they did that I'll never know but they screw up the whole look of the car. Smooth them out and they've got a winner. For you guys hoping for a 'Cuda, forget it unless you want to drop another $20K on a body kit and all the related body work and paint involved to make a Challenger a 'Cuda.
I'll take a plain old Challenger. Much more classy IMHO.
#10
11-01-2007 | 08:42 PM
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
RE: SEMA '07: Barracuda
As much as I love the idea of this, actually building a new 'Cuda just wouldnt make sense since outside the different grille and the nameplate, there wouldnt be much to separate it from the challenger.
The thing to do would be to give it the same bodystyle as the 300C only shorter, and make it only as a ragtop, leaving the hardtop to the challenger. Then axe the sebring convertible.
The thing to do would be to give it the same bodystyle as the 300C only shorter, and make it only as a ragtop, leaving the hardtop to the challenger. Then axe the sebring convertible.