Brand News, Concepts & Rumors Have you heard? Have you seen? No? Come on in, read and discuss the latest from Dodge. (This is not a tech section.)

6.1 FOR TRUCK'S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 04-06-2005, 10:42 PM
redriderbob's Avatar
redriderbob
redriderbob is offline
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 6.1 FOR TRUCK'S

Also the trucks will not have the outrageous power of the SRT lineup, but instead the Ram Heavy Duty model will get the 6.1L configuration for a replacement of the deceased 8.0L (488CI) "MAGNUM" V-10. The 6.1L HEMI "MAGNUM" V-8 will only be available on the Ram Heavy Duty models. No word on an Ram SRT-8 or Durango SRT-8 anytime soon. I did hear word from one of my sources that the SRT group will be giving the Dodge Dakota the SRT makeover, with possible 6.1L HEMI V-8 power from the Dodge Magnum SRT-8, Dodge Charger SRT-8, Chrysler 300C SRT-8, and the Grand Cherokee SRT-8. Why the Dakota instead of the Durango? Simple, many former 1998-2002 Dodge Dakota 5.9L R/T owners are looking to replace their trucks w/ new affordable performance pickups. The Ram SRT-10 is out of the budge, when you are talking about simple power performance trucks. Look at either the SEMA show later this year, or the LA Auto Show in December to show us more about the performance of the new Dakota platform.

redriderbob
 
  #12  
Old 04-20-2005, 06:47 AM
MG42pillbox's Avatar
MG42pillbox
MG42pillbox is offline
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Location: TBK Enterprises
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 6.1 FOR TRUCK'S

Bob, I am guessing the biggest difference will be compression ratio. I cant see an HD truck with 10.3 to 1. 2nd I wish they would make it a stroker Hemi like a 6.6 or 6.7. Then all it needs is force induction to make SICK Power.
 
  #13  
Old 04-20-2005, 12:23 PM
Danko's Avatar
Danko
Danko is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 6.1 FOR TRUCK'S

Charger, Where did those prices you used above come from? Do you really think the Mustang will be 70K? Where will we be able to get a 450 h.p. Charger or even the 425 for $36K? Also, anyone know if all the 300 family SRT's will have the $2100?? gas guzzler tax or not? Did I read here the Magnum is enough like a truck it won't get it? Who knows?
 
  #14  
Old 04-20-2005, 01:54 PM
BadStratRT's Avatar
BadStratRT
BadStratRT is offline
The Forum Tyrant
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Puttin' Detroit City back on the map.
Posts: 27,728
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: 6.1 FOR TRUCK'S

no jack..i think he means the GT500..which very well may be that much.
 
  #15  
Old 04-20-2005, 02:12 PM
Danko's Avatar
Danko
Danko is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 6.1 FOR TRUCK'S

Charger, Please, where did you get the above numbers you used?
 
  #16  
Old 04-20-2005, 04:38 PM
BadStratRT's Avatar
BadStratRT
BadStratRT is offline
The Forum Tyrant
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Puttin' Detroit City back on the map.
Posts: 27,728
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: 6.1 FOR TRUCK'S

jack, thank you, the GT500, which is the 450+ hp mustang, will cost that much...the regularly priced stang doesnt have 450hp.
 
  #17  
Old 04-20-2005, 05:26 PM
ramfan5.9's Avatar
ramfan5.9
ramfan5.9 is offline
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 12,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 6.1 FOR TRUCK'S


ORIGINAL: redriderbob
I did hear word from one of my sources that the SRT group will be giving the Dodge Dakota the SRT makeover, with possible 6.1L HEMI V-8 power from the Dodge Magnum SRT-8, Dodge Charger SRT-8, Chrysler 300C SRT-8, and the Grand Cherokee SRT-8. Why the Dakota instead of the Durango? Simple, many former 1998-2002 Dodge Dakota 5.9L R/T owners are looking to replace their trucks w/ new affordable performance pickups. redriderbob

now that would be awesome



and i bet it could hang with a lightning
 
  #18  
Old 04-24-2005, 05:16 PM
Kensai's Avatar
Kensai
Kensai is offline
Champion
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default RE: 6.1 FOR TRUCK'S

I think a SRT 8 Dakota will Kill the Lightning! i think even a moderately modded 5.9 Dak R/T can hang neck to neck with a lightning.

A SRT Dakota will remind me the days of the outrageous Chevy Cyclone truck!
 
  #19  
Old 05-12-2005, 05:49 PM
shmiggz's Avatar
shmiggz
shmiggz is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 6.1 FOR TRUCK'S

Actually the new mustang shelby gt500 is suppose to be around 36k and have over 450 horsepower. The charger on the other hand is going to be about 39k and have 425hp and 4 doors. Me thinks the mustang is going to be the better seller of the two (even though i would take the charger).
 
  #20  
Old 05-13-2005, 03:55 PM
MG42pillbox's Avatar
MG42pillbox
MG42pillbox is offline
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Location: TBK Enterprises
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 6.1 FOR TRUCK'S

ORIGINAL: shmiggz

Actually the new mustang shelby gt500 is suppose to be around 36k and have over 450 horsepower. The charger on the other hand is going to be about 39k and have 425hp and 4 doors. Me thinks the mustang is going to be the better seller of the two (even though i would take the charger).

Yea the Furd is supposed to be this and supposed to be that, to bad the Charger is What it is, and Is already a Phenomenal vehicle and has about 4 times as much quality as that stang, that's where the difference is first off, 2nd the Charger is not in the same class as the stang, the stang is not only a POS compared to the Charger, the Charger is much bigger much safer and has much more room for passengers. Last but not least, the Naturally Aspirated 6.1 Hemi actually makes 450+ Horse Power at the Crank, and is much more stout and reliable than the Ford 4.6 SC
 


Quick Reply: 6.1 FOR TRUCK'S



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:23 PM.