I don't know where these Yahoo idiots get their info. They always praise crappy cars like Toyota and GM but always bash Chrysler. Very Bias in my opinion.

I own 3 Dodge vehicles and have no complaints about their quality. BS I say

http://autos.yahoo.com/articles/auto...s-for-quality/

 

+1
If you read the actual quality surveys and can find the rare times the "poor quality" ratings are explained, they always mention only one thing: "cheap, hard plastic interior parts". I'll give them the point that a lot of hard plastics are used, but I'd rather have a hard plastic interior that lasts 20 years than the Toyota style soft vinyl dash and door tops that fall apart in 3 years. Here in Az, none of the Toyota's that are parked outside have the dashes last more than 3 or at most, maybe 5 years. Anyway, Toyota c@ck suckers will never tell the truth about Chrysler products. It was the same way in the 80's when I was a teenager and only changed briefly and a little when the LH's came out in the 90's.

 

The saddest part is that so many people believe this garbage. I'm sure it does hurt sales too.

 

I just laugh at all the other car buyers and magazines who diss on my chrysler. Of course this a new year and already gaining wonderful praise with all the changes that chrysler needed after diamler stripped us of everything good.

 

I read a review on yahoo where they bashed the new wrangler for having wind noise... their test vehicle was a ragtop with half doors (meaning that the windows were the zip up plastic ones) I lol'd and disregarded all else they wrote lol

 

Last season Top Gear tested the Land Rover ragtop vs the Wrangler and the Wrangler was more than 50% quiet than the RR at 70 mph and it outperformed the RR in all their tests at half the price.