Dodge Caravan The Dodge Caravan is the best selling mini van from Dodge. How many Dodge Caravan owners here at DodgeForum.com would agree? Discuss it now!

Comparsion of the 3.3 to the 3.8

Old Apr 12, 2010 | 03:39 PM
  #1  
Ole Goat's Avatar
Ole Goat
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Default Comparsion of the 3.3 to the 3.8

Can someone elaborate on the engine pros & cons as to the 3.3 Versus the 3.8. Also to what years did they run the 3.8 to.

I currently have a 2000 Grand Caravan with the 3.8 and it gets good fuel economy, provided you don't have a lead foot. I am looking to go into a newer model, and was wondering if the 3.8 was still available and to what years. These are a pretty heavy Van and I prefer the larger engine, and have no knowledge on the 3.3, and its performance.

thanks in advance for replies.
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 10:10 PM
  #2  
master tech's Avatar
master tech
Site Moderator & Tech
15 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,642
Likes: 108
From: Near Sacramento,ca
Default

The 3.3 and 3.8 have been great motors. You can still get both engine thru the 2010 models. But the 3.8 comes with the 62TE transmission and so does the new 4.0 engine. I understand there will be a new engine coming out maybe 2011 or 2012 which will be a 3.6L penastar engine. That engine will be a VVT.
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 11:16 AM
  #3  
TJeepman's Avatar
TJeepman
Professional
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From:
Default

Originally Posted by Ole Goat
Can someone elaborate on the engine pros & cons as to the 3.3 Versus the 3.8. Also to what years did they run the 3.8 to.

I currently have a 2000 Grand Caravan with the 3.8 and it gets good fuel economy, provided you don't have a lead foot. I am looking to go into a newer model, and was wondering if the 3.8 was still available and to what years. These are a pretty heavy Van and I prefer the larger engine, and have no knowledge on the 3.3, and its performance.

thanks in advance for replies.
They are the same engine with a 0.5 litre displacement difference, which increases the horsepower and torque for the 3.8L. The gearing may be different to allow for this and to help the 3.8 get better gas mileage than it would with the same gearing as the 3.3L. My 2002 3.3L performs just fne and doesn't seem lacking in acceleration, even when fully loaded. Since the 3.8L will be reving somewhat slower through its lifetime, one could expect it to last longer, but then again, both engines seem to last forever normally.
The larger 4.0L engine is a different engine, more sophisticated with a timing belt instead of timing chain and is more powerful. I prefer the timing chain (0 maintenance) to the timing belt (belt and water pump {preventative] are replaced routinely per maintenance schedule).
The 3.8 is no longer available in Canada (except or the Jeep). The standard engine is the 3.3L in the newer vans with the 4.0L as optional.
The 3.3L, in say a 2007, may have similar horsepower to the 3.8L in your 2000 due to increases in hp over the years. To really get a feel for it, best to test drive and compare.
 

Last edited by TJeepman; Apr 13, 2010 at 11:22 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 11:39 AM
  #4  
Ole Goat's Avatar
Ole Goat
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Default

Thanks guys for the information, sure is appreciated. I just now have one other question and that was in an answer to the engine differences. The new question is the 62TE transmission, is this a good tranny? Again thanks for the input.
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 05:24 PM
  #5  
TJeepman's Avatar
TJeepman
Professional
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From:
Default

The 62TE has been around for a few years in the Pacifica and Avenger. It made its way to the Minivans in 2008. Here's a description of it with some nice pictures if you ever want to take one apart. lol http://www.allpar.com/mopar/transmissions/62TE.html

The 62TE is a "sealed" transmission, meaning no readily available dipstick to use to check the transmission fluid level. Lots of transmissions are that way these days.

The 62TE seems to perform well, from reports I have read. They are also used in the Volkswagen Routan mated to a 4.0L.
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 PM.