Dodge Caravan The Dodge Caravan is the best selling mini van from Dodge. How many Dodge Caravan owners here at DodgeForum.com would agree? Discuss it now!

[General]: 2013 Grand Caravan highway gas mileage Florida bound

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 17, 2015 | 01:46 PM
  #1  
peters5's Avatar
peters5
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default 2013 Grand Caravan highway gas mileage Florida bound

Anybody know what to expect for fuel economy Toronto to Florida at 70-75mph, February, 2 persons, light luggage, Michelin X-ice at 40psi?
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2015 | 12:21 PM
  #2  
tjnc's Avatar
tjnc
Professional
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Default

I go to NW Jacksonville from Charlotte NC quite often. I just use 20 MPG even though I often get 21 and 22. It costs about $50.00 per-way.

If you use the Torque Android app and a cheap OBDII bluetooth unit you can get more accurate calculations. I've never got it to actually work on my 2001 and 2003 though.. It'd be awesom if it did, it uses multiple sensors to monitor MPG. It's probably the most accurate measurement you'll get..

You won't see much difference unless you have a 2008+ with a six-speeds transmission(3.8 and 4.0), and probably best with the 2011+ with Pentastar engine and six-speed.. Pentastar has cylinder deactivation..
 

Last edited by tjnc; Feb 18, 2015 at 12:29 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2015 | 12:42 PM
  #3  
hoosierrun's Avatar
hoosierrun
Amateur
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 34
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by peters5
Anybody know what to expect for fuel economy Toronto to Florida at 70-75mph, February, 2 persons, light luggage, Michelin X-ice at 40psi?
You should get about 25 MPG average (you'll have to convert to metric if that's what you use ), depending on how many traffic jams you get into (stop and go due to bad weather). We took our 2014 from Florida to Maine last Summer and consistantly got 25-26 MPG on the highway. The one year difference from 2013 to 2014 shouldn't matter. The 2014 might be a hair lighter due to more aluminum used in the vehicle. Even when we rented a 2011 to go from Florida to Arizona and back in 2012, we were getting close to 25 MPG. The 3.6 with the 6 speed in economy mode does well. We were on some rural roads running about 55 and often got 28-29 MPG.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2015 | 01:55 PM
  #4  
tjnc's Avatar
tjnc
Professional
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hoosierrun
You should get about 25 MPG average (you'll have to convert to metric if that's what you use ), depending on how many traffic jams you get into (stop and go due to bad weather). We took our 2014 from Florida to Maine last Summer and consistantly got 25-26 MPG on the highway. The one year difference from 2013 to 2014 shouldn't matter. The 2014 might be a hair lighter due to more aluminum used in the vehicle. Even when we rented a 2011 to go from Florida to Arizona and back in 2012, we were getting close to 25 MPG. The 3.6 with the 6 speed in economy mode does well. We were on some rural roads running about 55 and often got 28-29 MPG.

The 2008-2014 curb weight is almost identical to 2001-2007 with same options. The engine and trans molds and materials differ almost not at all. It's probably the cylinder deactivation and additional two-gears. My 3.8 2003 gets 19-23. I think I can get 25 at 65+.

Unless you're going by PCM monitoring your calculations are going to be rough approximations like mine.

As soon as the 2011+ used market goes under 9k I'm getting a pentastar.
 

Last edited by tjnc; Feb 18, 2015 at 01:57 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2015 | 08:04 AM
  #5  
DodgeCaravan2010SXT's Avatar
DodgeCaravan2010SXT
All Star
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Default

I did a google and I found it was 1000. I think in total trip
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2015 | 01:35 PM
  #6  
georgef's Avatar
georgef
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 358
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by tjnc
The 2008-2014 curb weight is almost identical to 2001-2007 with same options. The engine and trans molds and materials differ almost not at all. It's probably the cylinder deactivation and additional two-gears. My 3.8 2003 gets 19-23. I think I can get 25 at 65+.

Unless you're going by PCM monitoring your calculations are going to be rough approximations like mine.

As soon as the 2011+ used market goes under 9k I'm getting a pentastar.
The Pentastar doesn't currently have the Multi-Displacement System (aka MDS)(Chysler's term for cylinder deactivation), it was planned but allegedly the gain in MPG were not sufficient to justify the added cost.

Originally Posted by stuffedbackseat
Chrysler 3.6L VVT Pentastar V6 Engine

The Pentastar engine is one of the most versatile engines on the market today...

...Although the Pentastar doesn't have cylinder deactivation, direct injection, or a turbocharger, it is set up for all three. This again shows its versatility as an engine and the ingenuity of Chrysler as they move forward...
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2015 | 02:27 PM
  #7  
tjnc's Avatar
tjnc
Professional
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by georgef
The Pentastar doesn't currently have the Multi-Displacement System (aka MDS)(Chysler's term for cylinder deactivation), it was planned but allegedly the gain in MPG were not sufficient to justify the added cost.
The two gears probably allow lower RPM at speed, and VVT basically works like Acura/Honda VTEC where there is more efficient cam at low RPM..
 

Last edited by tjnc; Feb 21, 2015 at 02:30 PM.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:20 AM.