...can't type anymore on this subject... just sharing a few pics....



..some alternate colours...
sketches

 

Hmm... Move the "cockpit" back some/lengthen the hood & front end.

 

Submit it to Dodge! Sweeeeet!

 

even more proof that this new charger was so well designed to match the old design. 2 bad u people have your heads so far up your asses to realize it, because it has 4 doors.

[IMG]local://upfiles/5543/37C26A158B294AD4BB57947E60F0B56B.jpg[/IMG]

 

LMAO Nick, that's great, i totally agree

 

The new Charger sucks, and will continue to suck. Quit bringing back these old cars and giving them a bad name. [sm=imsmilin.gif]




-Matt-

 

While I appreciate feedback, how do you equate a simple size comparison of a shell on the same platform, with an example of two vastly different styles being anything in the same, let alone the starting point and direction. Perhaps the sketch should have been labelled "contrast" as opposed to comparison, as even the size is not the same -- proportion fixes. But again, totally different shell designed to show that they could have used the same drivetrain, to produce a car more fitting to the name. -- and not just the opinion of hardcore owners.

With your assesment, I could take a bug, and overlay a sedan of similar wheel base, and say they were the same, and followed the same design philosophy.

It's not simply about the 4 door issue. While yes that is a big one, it goes a lot deeper than that. From the whole effort and attitude behind the 06, the front end, the sides, the back end view (off absolutely any other sedan out there), the list goes on and on. But there is certainly a lot more than a door count issue that adds to the confusion of calling the 06 a Charger.

Just my opinion, but arguably, some of it is fact.

 

...quick and dirty perspective of the same thing i did above...minor change in the front (from mine)...

..yo Dodge, Daytona *this*:

 

very cool sketches plum!

but i still dont want a high performance 4 door sedan...[:@]

 

4 doors???