4th Gen Ram Tech 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2009 - 2018 Rams and the 2019 Ram Classic. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Can someone please explain gear ratios to me?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 08:04 PM
  #1  
Kody202's Avatar
Kody202
Thread Starter
|
Amateur
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default Can someone please explain gear ratios to me?

I'm a little confused about what exactly the 3.92 that is in my TRX4 means and why its a good or bad thing? So higher # 4.56 puts out more torque at a given RPM range? So this will help my mileage for city driving but hurt it on the highway? And the 3.92 is kind of like the middle ground between performance and mileage? I heard that getting new tires such as a 33" or 35" can have a different effect depending on your gearing.
 

Last edited by Kody202; Aug 30, 2012 at 08:16 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 08:24 PM
  #2  
MoparPaul's Avatar
MoparPaul
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: The Spacecoast of Florida
Default

Higher (numerically) gears give you low end torque good for towing and burn outs... but higher rpms and lower mileage at hi-way speeds... I have factory 3.92s and turn 2k rpms @70 mph w/20" wheels,
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 09:47 PM
  #3  
dirtydog's Avatar
dirtydog
Moderate User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 17,003
Likes: 21
From: Albany, NY
Default

3:55 would be considered "Prairie gears" with weak low end torque but able to keep rpms low on highway. 4:56's are considered "drag/towing" gears as they alter the torque curve and produce power at slower speed(because they make the engine rev more) and produce power instantly because the rpms are kept in the powerband but they rev very high when traveling on the freeway.
Your 3:92's are in the middle and are good for 33" rubber and mild towing to get best of both low end torque and reducing highway rpms.
3rd Gen Hemi's produce more power and achieve better mpg's when rpms about 2200 at crusing speed. So, you could actually go to 4:10's get better mpg's(hardly even noticeable) and slightly better torque curve(not very noticeable either)
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 10:50 PM
  #4  
nolimits's Avatar
nolimits
Rookie
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Default

It's the ratio of complete driveshaft revolutions to a single axle/wheel rotation. 3.92:1 ratio would mean the driveshaft turns 3.92 times completely around by the time the wheel makes one complete rotation. Anything other than that is personal preference and compromise.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 08:46 AM
  #5  
Kody202's Avatar
Kody202
Thread Starter
|
Amateur
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

Ok so for mostly city driving ( unfortunately for now ) The 4.56 would be better or as you said the 4.10.. Awesome, probably gonna be a while before I change anything. Don't really have $1800 sitting around once my tires and exhaust are bought haha.. Thanks for the help guys!
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 11:38 AM
  #6  
dirtydog's Avatar
dirtydog
Moderate User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 17,003
Likes: 21
From: Albany, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Kody202
Ok so for mostly city driving ( unfortunately for now ) The 4.56 would be better or as you said the 4.10.. Awesome, probably gonna be a while before I change anything. Don't really have $1800 sitting around once my tires and exhaust are bought haha.. Thanks for the help guys!
I wouldn't change a thing if I were you. Except if you have a factory LSD out back, then stick in an Auburn or DTT instead.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 12:45 PM
  #7  
d40830's Avatar
d40830
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: salem,nh
Default

I wouldn't change anything either. Unless you are doing a very specific task that you are struggleing with you probably wouldn't be able to justify the cost versus the reward for the swap.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 02:08 PM
  #8  
hemi4109's Avatar
hemi4109
Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by d40830
I wouldn't change anything either. Unless you are doing a very specific task that you are struggleing with you probably wouldn't be able to justify the cost versus the reward for the swap.
^^^X3. Unless you have a real heavy foot, shares in a tire company or haul a big trailer, the 3.92/4.10's are a good range. Now if you increase your tire diameter by 10-20%, then 4.56 might be nice to bring you back to stock performance but otherwise, keep the $1800 and buy some other toys.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 07:49 PM
  #9  
Kody202's Avatar
Kody202
Thread Starter
|
Amateur
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

I don't do any hauling or own any tire company shares so looks like I'll completely forget about the gearing haha. Pretty much exactly what I wanted to hear! Thanks for the help

And gonna slap some 33"s on there in the next week or so. I want BFGoodrich KM2s or possibly the KM or Nitto Trail Grapplers. You guys have any opinions on which of these tires over the other.. Gonna be about 75% on road 25% off road
 

Last edited by Kody202; Aug 31, 2012 at 07:55 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2012 | 09:14 AM
  #10  
WNDERR's Avatar
WNDERR
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: North Aurora, Il - 40 miles west of Chicago
Default

It really depends on what "off road" means to you. And, your personal preferrence, to looks or function.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:40 AM.