Dodge Forum Site Issues and Suggestions Having an issue with the DF software? This is your section!

AMD vs Intel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 11:04 AM
  #1  
2007 SLT Hemi Power's Avatar
2007 SLT Hemi Power
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From:
Default AMD vs Intel

I am looking to buy a Dell desktop and trying to decide to get a AMD or Intel processor, seems like the AMD is faster, which is best?
 
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 11:15 AM
  #2  
DevilsReject's Avatar
DevilsReject
Noob Assassin
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,447
Likes: 0
Default RE: AMD vs Intel

ORIGINAL: 2007 SLT Hemi Power

I am looking to buy a Dell desktop and trying to decide to get a AMD or Intel processor, seems like the AMD is faster, which is best?
The Intel chips (Core 2 Duo) are faster......but the AMD chips are fairly good too.

Ever since Intel released their Core 2 Duo lineup, they've virtually destroyed AMD's comparable processor.....

While the AMD processor may be a higher gigahertz, it doesnt make it faster....as you can have a Core 2 Duo that's 1.5ghz outperform an AMD or Intel that's 2.4ghz...

Why? Simple.... 2 Core's vs. 1 Core..

 
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 12:49 PM
  #3  
2007 SLT Hemi Power's Avatar
2007 SLT Hemi Power
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: AMD vs Intel

it seems like a intel World, like Windows. I know Lynx is better, so many programs do not work with it, same as MS Word vs Open Source
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 11:07 PM
  #4  
neoncrazy101's Avatar
neoncrazy101
Champion
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,650
Likes: 1
From: Ohio
Default RE: AMD vs Intel

i love my AMD socket A...aka AthlonXP 2600+ 2.13GHrz. its clock speed is 2.13GHrz, but its faster than my churches projection computer which is a 2.8GHrz P4.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2008 | 10:00 AM
  #5  
casper3380's Avatar
casper3380
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default RE: AMD vs Intel

LIke said above AMD are good chips, but the new Intels are far faster and pulling away. Intel has larger cache than the amd, though only one core can use that cache at a time while the amd has a cache for each core. My new laptop is an amd chip and it works great. Rated faster than my 3.4 Ghz p4. Follow the link below. Its pretty well updated and will give you an idea of where the chips stand, almost all new cept absolute recent and old.

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/

hope it helps ya m8


 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2008 | 12:00 PM
  #6  
DevilsReject's Avatar
DevilsReject
Noob Assassin
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,447
Likes: 0
Default RE: AMD vs Intel

ORIGINAL: casper3380

LIke said above AMD are good chips, but the new Intels are far faster and pulling away. Intel has larger cache than the amd, though only one core can use that cache at a time while the amd has a cache for each core. My new laptop is an amd chip and it works great. Rated faster than my 3.4 Ghz p4. Follow the link below. Its pretty well updated and will give you an idea of where the chips stand, almost all new cept absolute recent and old.

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/

hope it helps ya m8


Yep, although the latest Intel dual/quad core chips have the cache divided evenly.... I have a Quad core 2.13ghz 8mb cache chip...
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 03:38 AM
  #7  
nickoman01's Avatar
nickoman01
The Only Elite DF Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,955
Likes: 0
From: The Ghetto of Northville
Default RE: AMD vs Intel

im an AMD person and i will be the first to admit intel currently has the better chips. now that didnt stop me from buying amd though. i am fimiliar with their setup and ****. the only advantage AMD may have is that it can be cheapier. but on the performance scale intel currently is producing better chips.
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 11:09 AM
  #8  
03neonRT's Avatar
03neonRT
Grand Champion
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Default RE: AMD vs Intel

ORIGINAL: DevilsReject

ORIGINAL: casper3380

LIke said above AMD are good chips, but the new Intels are far faster and pulling away. Intel has larger cache than the amd, though only one core can use that cache at a time while the amd has a cache for each core. My new laptop is an amd chip and it works great. Rated faster than my 3.4 Ghz p4. Follow the link below. Its pretty well updated and will give you an idea of where the chips stand, almost all new cept absolute recent and old.

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/

hope it helps ya m8


Yep, although the latest Intel dual/quad core chips have the cache divided evenly.... I have a Quad core 2.13ghz 8mb cache chip...
I cant wait for the new Nehalem CPU's to come out later this year, according to some tests I've seen Intel has been able to run these things upward of 4.5GHz on standard air cooling...the new 45nm architecture is supposed to be leaps ahead of the current Conroe chips too.
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 11:36 AM
  #9  
HankL's Avatar
HankL
Champion
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,313
Likes: 8
Default RE: AMD vs Intel

I am waiting to see the new Toshiba laptop that will have the "Cell" multi-processor chip
that Sony, Toshiba and Motorola developed
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 12:14 PM
  #10  
dhvaughan's Avatar
dhvaughan
Hall Of Fame
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,204
Likes: 10
From: Gainesville, Ga.
Default RE: AMD vs Intel

in the never ending race for speed, Intel is currently slightly ahead.

however, it really doesn't matter. either one is fine and P.O.S. VISTA will waste most of it anyway. i'd consider price, warranty, and other features.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:54 AM.