315/70/17 Verses 285/70/17 BFG'S
#1
315/70/17 Verses 285/70/17 BFG'S
Well the tires are the same price @ discount tire and I was wondering what one could expect ny going with the 315/70/17 I know there may be a little gas milage loss, but how much?
this would be the only thing that I have changes on with my 2006 4X4 2500 series Quad Cab
BF Goodrich All terrain TA KO
right now I am getting about 19 to 20 MPG and would very much like it to stay that way.
What do you guys think?
this would be the only thing that I have changes on with my 2006 4X4 2500 series Quad Cab
BF Goodrich All terrain TA KO
right now I am getting about 19 to 20 MPG and would very much like it to stay that way.
What do you guys think?
#4
RE: 315/70/17 Verses 285/70/17 BFG'S
I lost from 1-2 mpg's when I went to 33"s (305/70/17) but the tread is a bit more aggresive than the BFG's and I think there a bit wider as well.
One thing to note is the BFG is a "D" rated tire. The load range is a little dif. and the side walls are a little thinner so you may get a little more bounce in the ride.
Great look though. Love mine. Easy trade for a loss in MPG's.
I dont know why DC doesnt go with a bigger tire / rim on these trucks to start. Looks funny. I mean look at the Fords. There comming with 18" wheels and they really fill up the tire well.
One thing to note is the BFG is a "D" rated tire. The load range is a little dif. and the side walls are a little thinner so you may get a little more bounce in the ride.
Great look though. Love mine. Easy trade for a loss in MPG's.
I dont know why DC doesnt go with a bigger tire / rim on these trucks to start. Looks funny. I mean look at the Fords. There comming with 18" wheels and they really fill up the tire well.
#6
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North Plains, Oregon
Posts: 1,497
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 315/70/17 Verses 285/70/17 BFG'S
ORIGINAL: BlkRam69
I dont know why DC doesnt go with a bigger tire / rim on these trucks to start. Looks funny. I mean look at the Fords. There comming with 18" wheels and they really fill up the tire well.
I dont know why DC doesnt go with a bigger tire / rim on these trucks to start. Looks funny. I mean look at the Fords. There comming with 18" wheels and they really fill up the tire well.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#9
RE: 315/70/17 Verses 285/70/17 BFG'S
My mileage change was negligible going to 35's - but then I think the factors Steve0 outlines have a greater effect when you have the 3:73 rear versus the 4:10 - seems like my 4:10 mileage was not-so-great to begin with, and the larger tires couldn't make it worse. But one of the many things I've learned from this forum is what a difference in driving technique can make in the mileage - and not following the logic of gassers where if you take it easier you get better mileage. Like the guys here have claimed, when I push it my mileage actually gets better to the tune of almost one MPG. (but so many years of driving like a granny after racking up too many tickets makes it hard to get used to pushing it)
#10
RE: 315/70/17 Verses 285/70/17 BFG'S
ORIGINAL: ramtradxb
But one of the many things I've learned from this forum is what a difference in driving technique can make in the mileage - and not following the logic of gassers where if you take it easier you get better mileage. Like the guys here have claimed, when I push it my mileage actually gets better to the tune of almost one MPG. (but so many years of driving like a granny after racking up too many tickets makes it hard to get used to pushing it)
But one of the many things I've learned from this forum is what a difference in driving technique can make in the mileage - and not following the logic of gassers where if you take it easier you get better mileage. Like the guys here have claimed, when I push it my mileage actually gets better to the tune of almost one MPG. (but so many years of driving like a granny after racking up too many tickets makes it hard to get used to pushing it)
r