Chrysler 300C SRT-8 Killer? New STS-V!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 01-03-2005, 11:58 AM
big asp's Avatar
big asp
big asp is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Chrysler 300C SRT-8 Killer? New STS-V!

I need a ride in your truck real bad! I start drooling everytime I see pictures of your blower. We may actually be down there before the Rod Run. I'll be sure to let you know if we do.
 
  #22  
Old 01-03-2005, 12:06 PM
big asp's Avatar
big asp
big asp is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Chrysler 300C SRT-8 Killer? New STS-V!


ORIGINAL: SXTNNY

Well, call me a dumbass!! Okay, so I am "partially" right. There is still no STS-V yet. HAHA!! Cadillac has NOTHING about it on their website that I can find. They don't make a 4.4L Northstar though. Everything I can find says it will still be the 4.6L Northstar, although it will be blown.

I stand corrected.
Here is a quote from Motor Trend Magazine, "Although the new STS-v's supercharged 4.4 liter V-8 shares the basic architecture with other Northstars, it's essentially an all-new powerplant..." (Feb. 2005 issue, p.26)
 
  #23  
Old 01-03-2005, 08:40 PM
SXTNNY's Avatar
SXTNNY
SXTNNY is offline
Captain
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Chrysler 300C SRT-8 Killer? New STS-V!

See, GM Powertrain doesn't have anything listed on the "4.4L" at all.
 
  #24  
Old 01-04-2005, 03:01 AM
Hemipower04's Avatar
Hemipower04
Hemipower04 is offline
Professional
Join Date: May 2004
Location:
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Chrysler 300C SRT-8 Killer? New STS-V!

Car and driver has an estimated price of 75,000 for the STS-V. "A bore reduction from 93 millimeters to 91, reducing displacment from 4.6 to 4.4 liters for improved fuel economy." The Sts-V has a very hot roots supercharger but then again this luxury car wasn't built to race. I have little doubt the Srt-8 will pull ahead, even with less horepower and without a supercharger.
 
  #25  
Old 01-04-2005, 03:13 AM
nickoman01's Avatar
nickoman01
nickoman01 is offline
The Only Elite DF Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Ghetto of Northville
Posts: 10,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Chrysler 300C SRT-8 Killer? New STS-V!

wont the srt8 weight a alot more because of the 6.1L vs 4.4L. thats weights it down, and then there is the hp disadvantage. I'm more worried about the srt8 being able to put the cts-v, not the sts-v in its place.
 
  #26  
Old 01-04-2005, 03:20 AM
Hemipower04's Avatar
Hemipower04
Hemipower04 is offline
Professional
Join Date: May 2004
Location:
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Chrysler 300C SRT-8 Killer? New STS-V!

they are both v8's. the 5.7 hemi doesn't wiegh more than the 4.7. the liters have nothing to do with the size of the motor or cylinders. It only discribes the amount of space in the cylinders.
 
  #27  
Old 01-04-2005, 03:22 AM
nickoman01's Avatar
nickoman01
nickoman01 is offline
The Only Elite DF Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Ghetto of Northville
Posts: 10,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Chrysler 300C SRT-8 Killer? New STS-V!

hmmm i learn something new everyday. thanks for clarifying that for me
 
  #28  
Old 01-04-2005, 01:04 PM
big asp's Avatar
big asp
big asp is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Chrysler 300C SRT-8 Killer? New STS-V!


ORIGINAL: nickoman01

I'm more worried about the srt8 being able to put the cts-v, not the sts-v in its place.
According to motor Trend's test numbers, neither the CTS-v nor the 300C SRT-8 has a clear advantage. They run so close that it's up to the driver's ability. That being said, considering size, comfort, looks, price ($11K less), my bias for Mopars, and the fact that my wife wants an automatic, the 300C SRT-8 is a much better value to me.

BTW, I test drove a Magnum R/T which, as you probably know, has the same trans as the SRT-8. When manually shifted, it wasn't bad at all.
 
  #29  
Old 01-04-2005, 01:42 PM
thestealth's Avatar
thestealth
thestealth is offline
Champion
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Chrysler 300C SRT-8 Killer? New STS-V!

Wouldn't the Northstar engine actually weigh a little more than the 6.1. I think the Northstars are OHC design. That usually means bigger heads to because all of the valvetrain (cam, camgears, etc.) are in the heads. I could be wrong and I am to lazy to look it up right now, but that is what I am thinking....
 
  #30  
Old 01-04-2005, 02:05 PM
big asp's Avatar
big asp
big asp is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Chrysler 300C SRT-8 Killer? New STS-V!

The Northstar weighs about 507 lbs. The 5.7L Hemi is around 485 lbs. and I don't think that the 6.1L will be much heavier, if at all. So, the weight of the two engines is virtually a wash.
 


Quick Reply: Chrysler 300C SRT-8 Killer? New STS-V!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:11 AM.