Racing Talk Talk about any racing here, whether it be street/strip, NASCAR, F1 etc.

Colorado quciker than dakota

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 06:53 AM
  #11  
71RoadRunner's Avatar
71RoadRunner
Legend
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,543
Likes: 2
From: United States
Default RE: Colorado quciker than dakota

Don't you think that if the Colorado was actually faster than the Lightning that it would have already been plastered all over the magazines. I guarantee that it would be quite big news if it were faster than the Lightning and just a little slower than the Ram SRT-10. The guy is completely full of

[IMG]local://upfiles/193/9E0EEDFD14C94629B38041C4D9686E73.gif[/IMG]
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 10:48 AM
  #12  
moparturd's Avatar
moparturd
Banned
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,136
Likes: 1
From:
Default RE: Colorado quciker than dakota

Thank GOD someone raised that flag. Even if they put the ls1 in one, it couldn't take a Lightning, let alone an SRT-10. More GM POOPY propaganda.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2004 | 01:13 PM
  #13  
vHiEpMeIr's Avatar
vHiEpMeIr
Record Breaker
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 0
From: Manhattan, Kansas, United States
Default RE: Colorado quciker than dakota

The Colorado's best engine is a 220 horsepower I-5, It could probabaly take a V-6 Dakota at best. I agree with 71roadrunner, somebody would be talking about it if it were that fast.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 PM.