Colorado quciker than dakota

Subscribe
Sep 8, 2004 | 06:53 AM
  #11  
RE: Colorado quciker than dakota
Don't you think that if the Colorado was actually faster than the Lightning that it would have already been plastered all over the magazines. I guarantee that it would be quite big news if it were faster than the Lightning and just a little slower than the Ram SRT-10. The guy is completely full of

[IMG]local://upfiles/193/9E0EEDFD14C94629B38041C4D9686E73.gif[/IMG]
Reply 0
Sep 8, 2004 | 10:48 AM
  #12  
RE: Colorado quciker than dakota
Thank GOD someone raised that flag. Even if they put the ls1 in one, it couldn't take a Lightning, let alone an SRT-10. More GM POOPY propaganda.
Reply 0
Sep 9, 2004 | 01:13 PM
  #13  
RE: Colorado quciker than dakota
The Colorado's best engine is a 220 horsepower I-5, It could probabaly take a V-6 Dakota at best. I agree with 71roadrunner, somebody would be talking about it if it were that fast.
Reply 0
Subscribe