1995-2000 Dodge Avenger The Dodge Avenger had smooth styling in addition to solid craftmanship. To this day you can find Dodge Avenger enthusiasts proud to show of their gems.

Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 12-07-2006, 03:38 AM
silvercoupe97's Avatar
silvercoupe97
silvercoupe97 is offline
Uber Moderator
Dodge Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)

Nope, not that one. That's too much engine for our engine bay. Otherwise, I'd have a 6g72 TT motor with drivetrain in my car instead of the 4g63T
Plus you don't put the entire motor in for the 3.0 swap, just parts of both.
 
  #22  
Old 12-07-2006, 03:48 AM
Pentecostal1988's Avatar
Pentecostal1988
Pentecostal1988 is offline
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)

well hopefully all this advice you dudes are givin me here helps me turn my venger into the slick demon of speed i want it to be..

 
  #23  
Old 12-07-2006, 10:26 AM
99_avenger's Avatar
99_avenger
99_avenger is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)

srew all of that get a pissed off bee....... i4 with turbo with[sm=nxsmile.gif]
 
  #24  
Old 12-07-2006, 12:32 PM
PappiDread6's Avatar
PappiDread6
PappiDread6 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)


ORIGINAL: Pentecostal1988

well doesnt the 3.0 from the stealth/3000GT put out like 220hp? i mean, thats wat engine i thought they were tlkin bout at exile.
Yeah there was talk of those engines fitting into an Eclispe. I truly doubted it until Hi Ho Silva said that they had longer engine bays and the fact that you can time and money make anythin possible. I was wondering if I wanted to strength my engine bay would I hafta fab up or use the the original subframe that the motor came on?
 
  #25  
Old 12-07-2006, 12:41 PM
DevilsReject's Avatar
DevilsReject
DevilsReject is offline
Noob Assassin
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)


ORIGINAL: PappiDread6


ORIGINAL: Pentecostal1988

well doesnt the 3.0 from the stealth/3000GT put out like 220hp? i mean, thats wat engine i thought they were tlkin bout at exile.
Yeah there was talk of those engines fitting into an Eclispe. I truly doubted it until Hi Ho Silva said that they had longer engine bays and the fact that you can time and money make anythin possible. I was wondering if I wanted to strength my engine bay would I hafta fab up or use the the original subframe that the motor came on?
The 3.0L from the Stealth/3000GT comes in two forms, N/A and twin turbo. The twin turbo version produces 300hp. The engine bays of the Avenger wont fit that motor setup. The Stratus coupes wont fit it either, as the way the manifold, headers, and turbo's sit, you'd have to move the firewall back.

With money, anything is possible, but unless you just wanted something to show off, it's not worth the time or investment.....
 
  #26  
Old 12-07-2006, 07:58 PM
Pentecostal1988's Avatar
Pentecostal1988
Pentecostal1988 is offline
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)

well my baby is getting built for speed and then looks...but for now SPEED SPEED SPEED! WITHOUT NITROUS!
 
  #27  
Old 12-07-2006, 11:36 PM
PappiDread6's Avatar
PappiDread6
PappiDread6 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)

Oh my bad that word "Strenght" is suppose 2b "Stretch" typin while tired. Oh yeah I know that big *** engine won't fit and if I do find a way and spend money to do it no doubt I'll be riding around with a plexy glass hood just to sho out with it. But I was saying is it possible to widin and lengthin out my engine bay?
 
  #28  
Old 12-09-2006, 03:03 AM
airman's Avatar
airman
airman is offline
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)

4g63-t and awd swap cheapest overall and probably best overhead for power ranges..

but if you're set on a 2.5 or a 3.0 and you already have the 2.5l...that means you'll have auto right? not sure how much power our a604 trannies will sustain...i mean if you're goin for power, might want a manual in there. which i'm not sure is possible with the 2.5's in our venge's. again, not sure. but like silver said...2.5's gonna be better for overall boost and you won't have to go out and buy/pull another engine, plus it's a tight fit for the 3.0.
 



Quick Reply: Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:17 PM.