1995-2000 Dodge Avenger The Dodge Avenger had smooth styling in addition to solid craftmanship. To this day you can find Dodge Avenger enthusiasts proud to show of their gems.

Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 03:38 AM
  #21  
silvercoupe97's Avatar
silvercoupe97
Uber Moderator
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Default RE: Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)

Nope, not that one. That's too much engine for our engine bay. Otherwise, I'd have a 6g72 TT motor with drivetrain in my car instead of the 4g63T
Plus you don't put the entire motor in for the 3.0 swap, just parts of both.
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 03:48 AM
  #22  
Pentecostal1988's Avatar
Pentecostal1988
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default RE: Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)

well hopefully all this advice you dudes are givin me here helps me turn my venger into the slick demon of speed i want it to be..

 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 10:26 AM
  #23  
99_avenger's Avatar
99_avenger
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)

srew all of that get a pissed off bee....... i4 with turbo with[sm=nxsmile.gif]
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 12:32 PM
  #24  
PappiDread6's Avatar
PappiDread6
Record Breaker
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)


ORIGINAL: Pentecostal1988

well doesnt the 3.0 from the stealth/3000GT put out like 220hp? i mean, thats wat engine i thought they were tlkin bout at exile.
Yeah there was talk of those engines fitting into an Eclispe. I truly doubted it until Hi Ho Silva said that they had longer engine bays and the fact that you can time and money make anythin possible. I was wondering if I wanted to strength my engine bay would I hafta fab up or use the the original subframe that the motor came on?
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 12:41 PM
  #25  
DevilsReject's Avatar
DevilsReject
Noob Assassin
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,447
Likes: 0
Default RE: Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)


ORIGINAL: PappiDread6


ORIGINAL: Pentecostal1988

well doesnt the 3.0 from the stealth/3000GT put out like 220hp? i mean, thats wat engine i thought they were tlkin bout at exile.
Yeah there was talk of those engines fitting into an Eclispe. I truly doubted it until Hi Ho Silva said that they had longer engine bays and the fact that you can time and money make anythin possible. I was wondering if I wanted to strength my engine bay would I hafta fab up or use the the original subframe that the motor came on?
The 3.0L from the Stealth/3000GT comes in two forms, N/A and twin turbo. The twin turbo version produces 300hp. The engine bays of the Avenger wont fit that motor setup. The Stratus coupes wont fit it either, as the way the manifold, headers, and turbo's sit, you'd have to move the firewall back.

With money, anything is possible, but unless you just wanted something to show off, it's not worth the time or investment.....
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 07:58 PM
  #26  
Pentecostal1988's Avatar
Pentecostal1988
Thread Starter
|
Rookie
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default RE: Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)

well my baby is getting built for speed and then looks...but for now SPEED SPEED SPEED! WITHOUT NITROUS!
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 11:36 PM
  #27  
PappiDread6's Avatar
PappiDread6
Record Breaker
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)

Oh my bad that word "Strenght" is suppose 2b "Stretch" typin while tired. Oh yeah I know that big *** engine won't fit and if I do find a way and spend money to do it no doubt I'll be riding around with a plexy glass hood just to sho out with it. But I was saying is it possible to widin and lengthin out my engine bay?
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 03:03 AM
  #28  
airman's Avatar
airman
Rookie
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Performance Rebuilt 2.5L VERSUS Performance Rebuilt 3.0L (6G72)

4g63-t and awd swap cheapest overall and probably best overhead for power ranges..

but if you're set on a 2.5 or a 3.0 and you already have the 2.5l...that means you'll have auto right? not sure how much power our a604 trannies will sustain...i mean if you're goin for power, might want a manual in there. which i'm not sure is possible with the 2.5's in our venge's. again, not sure. but like silver said...2.5's gonna be better for overall boost and you won't have to go out and buy/pull another engine, plus it's a tight fit for the 3.0.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 PM.