1st Gen Dakota Tech 1987 - 1996 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 1st Gen Dakota.

Better fuel economy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-24-2012, 07:30 AM
89newbie's Avatar
89newbie
89newbie is offline
Captain
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pa. now
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Better fuel economy?

I have repeadly read on dodge sites that the 1st gen cannot get decent mileage because of the flat front. If I can get highway, 20 to 21 out of my 94 318 and 24 to 25 from the 89 3.9 driving habit's has to have a lot to do with it. Back in the day when I was young,rofl, I learned from my Dad and Uncle. We had a small trucking company and hauled coal from strip mines driving old corn poppers, ( International Brand), dump trucks. Anyway if you give it enough gas to get it moving and let the engine rpm build to your shift point. It saves gas as opposed to puttin the pedal to the metal. On those old trucks it was believed that too much throttle with the loads burned valves, and really taxed the drive train. These trucks were 6 cylinder 4 speed's with split differentials and only had 2 axils. They were 10 ton trucks, but the man pratically did not exist so there was a tendency to overload. Dad and I never let them overload but my uncle did. Keeping the pedal out of the metal gave us two trips a day more than Uncle.
 

Last edited by 89newbie; 01-24-2012 at 07:50 AM. Reason: add content
  #2  
Old 01-24-2012, 01:05 PM
melodytoinvent's Avatar
melodytoinvent
melodytoinvent is offline
Captain
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've heard stuff like this before. Plus keeping it under 2000 rpms and things like that. Makes sense to me and I've seen good results so can't be all that bad haha
 
  #3  
Old 01-25-2012, 09:41 AM
89newbie's Avatar
89newbie
89newbie is offline
Captain
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pa. now
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by melodytoinvent
I've heard stuff like this before. Plus keeping it under 2000 rpms and things like that. Makes sense to me and I've seen good results so can't be all that bad haha
Back when I lived in Va I set cruise at 1800 on interstate in the intrest of fuel economy, and no interest in the over cranky state trooper. I found that 2000 RPm kept me in overdrive on hills much better which resulted in maby 1 to 2 more MPG. Dropping the tailgate also helps but Mr. State Trooper frowned on that so I didn't do it.
 
  #4  
Old 01-25-2012, 09:45 AM
tooltime's Avatar
tooltime
tooltime is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mt Airy NC
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have heard on Mythbusters the tailgate down did not work
 
  #5  
Old 01-25-2012, 07:21 PM
g. man's Avatar
g. man
g. man is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tooltime
I have heard on Mythbusters the tailgate down did not work
It depends on the vehicle, and other factors like tool box and such.

I've also found you burn more gas taking your time to get up to speed. I get better gas mileage when I pretend I'm at the track (within reason, not talking about red-lining it or anything)
 



Quick Reply: Better fuel economy?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:18 PM.