1st Gen Durango 1998 - 2003 Durango's

33/1050/15's installed, impressions.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2010 | 11:05 AM
  #21  
shrpshtr325's Avatar
shrpshtr325
THE ULTI-MOD
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,797
Likes: 36
From: Union NJ
Default

hahahaha i think we can all say that about ourselves at some point in time indy, its ok we wont ban you . . . yet
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2010 | 05:00 PM
  #22  
IndyDurango's Avatar
IndyDurango
Champion
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,822
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
Default

Oh my!

 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2010 | 05:08 PM
  #23  
mrwilliwizard's Avatar
mrwilliwizard
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: southern california
Default

haha i like the beer hat
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2010 | 07:09 PM
  #24  
hydrashocker's Avatar
hydrashocker
Hall Of Fame
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,228
Likes: 19
From: Riverton, UT
Default

Originally Posted by IndyDurango
LOL.

I **** people off weekly. Never on purpose. Just an ***.

I will always try to put out there the best recommendations for the actual D first... regardless of the drivers wishes. Sorry!

With that said, Beers are all on me!!



and a special one for HS!

IndyD
Thanks my friend!
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 06:30 PM
  #25  
Dislander's Avatar
Dislander
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Rural pierce county WA
Default

Everything you all are saying about mine would definetly apply to this whack durango on 37's w/no lift.

I spent some time last night looking at various lifts & tire combos. Plenty of them make mine look downright factory by comparison.

weather has not been co-operating for pics but will have t/s shackle pics up soon.
Name:  37.jpg
Views: 186
Size:  152.2 KB
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 12:12 AM
  #26  
hydrashocker's Avatar
hydrashocker
Hall Of Fame
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,228
Likes: 19
From: Riverton, UT
Default

^ Now that's just wrong! ^
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 01:27 AM
  #27  
IndyDurango's Avatar
IndyDurango
Champion
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,822
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
Default

Nevermind on my assessments.

We try to provide info to those that want to keep their D as pristine and long lived as possible. While there is nothing wrong with rough usage, and hell it may be a blast, all diag bets are off because info most won't apply. No need for fog light details on that D for example. LOL.

That D is trashed for road but perfect for off road it looks (except it needs a lift.) Looks like that day was fun, if not damaging.

IndyD
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 05:39 AM
  #28  
Dislander's Avatar
Dislander
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Rural pierce county WA
Default

Indy, I understand your viewpoint. you're just more conservative than I am. I don't mean politically, nor do I mean that as an insult.

I also hope that you inferring my "D" will suffer at my hands is not meant to be an insult.

In fact My "D" would argue that fact most vehemently. First this truck would have gone to the cash for clunkers program had I not accepted it, yes accepted it. cost me not a dime up front. that said, I have put over a grand into her this month. it has had it's tranny serviced for the first time ever, it has had a new rear seal, valve cover gaskets, timing chain, full major service & new tires. the tires it came with, one could see the air.

next month it gets a whole new suspension, polly bushings ball joints, hubs, brakes, the works. My cost in parts is over 800 bucks. If a body had to include labor charges , the work shes gets in the first two months would be close to four grand.

So my not running free truck with bald tires now sits proud to have an owner that shows some love, even if it's hard love from time to time.

Besides, if I want to go run the freeway at 140 in blissful comfort, I have the Galant for that. This is a truck.

They'll all be gone in a couple thousand years anyway.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 09:51 PM
  #29  
SadikOne1's Avatar
SadikOne1
Rookie
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by Dislander
In fact My "D" would argue that fact most vehemently. First this truck would have gone to the cash for clunkers program had I not accepted it, yes accepted it.
too right man..i was gonna do that too and get a Yota tacoma...

soo glad I didn't and kept the rango..I just couldn't stand the how weak the v4 compared to the V8

love my rango! and Im glad you love yours too!
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 10:47 PM
  #30  
shrpshtr325's Avatar
shrpshtr325
THE ULTI-MOD
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,797
Likes: 36
From: Union NJ
Default

no such thing as a V4 afaik, i think you meant I4 (straight 4) and YES they are gutless
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:01 PM.