1st Gen Durango 1998 - 2003 Durango's

Durango vs. Ranger...Which is faster?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 08-01-2011, 08:03 PM
MoparMan1991's Avatar
MoparMan1991
MoparMan1991 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Barksdale AFB, LA
Posts: 2,213
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by samnbensdad
Push and pull vs. push... 2wd

Speed limitations in 4wd = low vs. high 4wd mode.
There aren't any speed limitations in 4x4, and it certainly wouldn't be comparable to 4LO that has a top speed of about 35. Ive done 80 in my 4x4.
 
  #22  
Old 08-01-2011, 08:33 PM
shrpshtr325's Avatar
shrpshtr325
shrpshtr325 is offline
THE ULTI-MOD
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Union NJ
Posts: 19,794
Received 34 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

in 4wd high there is no special speed limiter above whats there anyway

however is is recommended by dodge that you dont go above 45 or 50 (i believe shift speed is said under 25 or 30 but i could be mistaken and i know i have shifted 4wd above that), although in most cases in 4wd the conditions dont allow you to go any faster

so what i would do is run in 2wd to save the chance of doing any damage, but i do know of people who do drag runs in 4wd and havnt had any problems, just shift out after you clear the finish line and before you turn off the strip. (and don switch in until you are in the staging area and will only be going straight from there to the end)
 
  #23  
Old 08-01-2011, 10:34 PM
adukart's Avatar
adukart
adukart is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 2,315
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by srch4me
you mean a ford exploder?
haha, that is what we used to call it, even my parents. Any ways the 242 or 244 if it has an electric switch (this transfer case came from the grand cherokee's) has a full time setting with out a speed limit or a part time traditional 4wd setting that is recommended no faster than 55. The 241 and 243 don't have this setting they can only go 55. I don't know about the
the AWD only transfer case.
 
  #24  
Old 08-02-2011, 02:51 AM
srch4me's Avatar
srch4me
srch4me is offline
All Star
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Richland, Washington
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

+1 sharps... i was positive the user manual said that
 
  #25  
Old 08-02-2011, 12:52 PM
Compactc9's Avatar
Compactc9
Compactc9 is offline
Veteran
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Denver
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've heard the Ford V6 is on the gutless side. Where my dad works (works for the city on fire trucks and similar things) they were driving Tahoes and decided to try some Explorers with the V6 to try and save on gas. They got worse mileage than the Tahoes and were gutless compared to them too.
 
  #26  
Old 08-02-2011, 07:59 PM
MoparMan1991's Avatar
MoparMan1991
MoparMan1991 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Barksdale AFB, LA
Posts: 2,213
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well my pops has a 1998 4.0 Explorer and he says it isn't too bad, but compared to his 95 cougar with a 4.6 its gutless.
 
  #27  
Old 08-02-2011, 09:47 PM
Old_School's Avatar
Old_School
Old_School is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Compactc9
I've heard the Ford V6 is on the gutless side. Where my dad works (works for the city on fire trucks and similar things) they were driving Tahoes and decided to try some Explorers with the V6 to try and save on gas. They got worse mileage than the Tahoes and were gutless compared to them too.
We used to run explorers as chief's cars back in the day but, quickly switch to first gen D when they came out in '98
 
  #28  
Old 08-02-2011, 11:00 PM
hydrashocker's Avatar
hydrashocker
hydrashocker is offline
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Riverton, UT
Posts: 14,228
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

When you pop it out of 4X4 on the fly your supposed to let off the gas, so with that said I would just go in 2wd and that's all for sure. Don't engage the tow button either, that will give you less torque management on the high end but lowers your low end torque in racing.

+1 Sharps, it is recommended by Dodge, but not a fact. However I wouldn't want to replace a front end or T-case.
 
  #29  
Old 08-03-2011, 12:37 PM
DomsDodgeDingo's Avatar
DomsDodgeDingo
DomsDodgeDingo is offline
Professional
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: "Thumb" area in Michigan
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks again for the replies. He hasn't even had it a week and has already had some issues with it stalling. Haha my 5.9 with 200k miles and still going strong never had a single problem....Gotta love it!
 
  #30  
Old 08-03-2011, 09:23 PM
MoparMan1991's Avatar
MoparMan1991
MoparMan1991 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Barksdale AFB, LA
Posts: 2,213
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thats the old Mopar quality right there.
 



Quick Reply: Durango vs. Ranger...Which is faster?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:56 AM.