Brake Pad Recommendation
#11
As far as rotors, I have had no problems with powerstop rotors that are drilled and slotted. The delco ones on my Durango however are drilled and slotted and are starting to crack from the holes outwards and are starting to get a vibration in them. This is with the EBC yellowstuff pads.
That_guy, comparing the charger to the durango just isnt a good idea, they are completely different classes of vehicle, i would never put ceramics on my challenger, but then thats my toy and i demand that it work at 100% all the time and dust/wear be damnd, thats why it gets a set of high performance street/track pads (wide temperature range semi-metallics, EBC yellowstuff), if it was a track only car i would be putting metallic brakes on it for better temperature resistance.
I'm comparing the performance of semi metallics against that of the powerstop ceramic blend on one vehicle and the performance of semi metallics against that of ceramics on another. Sure the brakes on the Durango aren't comparable to those on the Charger, but the comparison between compounds on the same vehicle will still apply. I promise that replacing your brake pads with romano cheese will suck on a Durango as much as on a Charger.
And I still stand by the plain ceramics not being a great idea. There's a reason they put bigger brakes on newer cars that come with ceramics, the ceramic compounds just don't have as much stopping power. It's the same thing that happened 30 years ago with asbestos brakes. Cars made with asbestos brakes suffered from decreased braking power when switching from asbestos to organic brake compounds. The asbestos pads had higher friction so a smaller brake performed better.
That_guy, comparing the charger to the durango just isnt a good idea, they are completely different classes of vehicle, i would never put ceramics on my challenger, but then thats my toy and i demand that it work at 100% all the time and dust/wear be damnd, thats why it gets a set of high performance street/track pads (wide temperature range semi-metallics, EBC yellowstuff), if it was a track only car i would be putting metallic brakes on it for better temperature resistance.
And I still stand by the plain ceramics not being a great idea. There's a reason they put bigger brakes on newer cars that come with ceramics, the ceramic compounds just don't have as much stopping power. It's the same thing that happened 30 years ago with asbestos brakes. Cars made with asbestos brakes suffered from decreased braking power when switching from asbestos to organic brake compounds. The asbestos pads had higher friction so a smaller brake performed better.
Last edited by that_guy; 07-17-2017 at 02:20 PM.
#12
Great discussion. Thanks to everyone for sharing and keep them coming.
Since I'm not towing and don't need any extra stopping power, I'm looking at some of the cheaper options out there. Is this Centric set of semi-metallic pads any good? I'm not planning on changing the rotors after a complete front suspension redo. That was much more expensive than I thought.
Since I'm not towing and don't need any extra stopping power, I'm looking at some of the cheaper options out there. Is this Centric set of semi-metallic pads any good? I'm not planning on changing the rotors after a complete front suspension redo. That was much more expensive than I thought.
#13
Originally Posted by shrpshtr325
the 98-02 had the same size rotor and brake pad (iirc) the upgrade to dual piston brakes and larger rotor was for the 2003 model year(this i am certain of), and it accompanied the conversion to 4 wheel discs (instead of drums on the rear).
while the 98-00 and 00-02 may have slight differences in brakes (mounting, hydraulic attachment point ect) i believe that they were functionally equivalent as far as rotor and brake size.
I was looking to do the same conversion on mine at one point, here is the data i managed to gather, the prices may be out of date, but the necessary parts was determined using parts manuals available in the FAQ thread here.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing
while the 98-00 and 00-02 may have slight differences in brakes (mounting, hydraulic attachment point ect) i believe that they were functionally equivalent as far as rotor and brake size.
I was looking to do the same conversion on mine at one point, here is the data i managed to gather, the prices may be out of date, but the necessary parts was determined using parts manuals available in the FAQ thread here.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing
#14
Unless you are driving the thing on a track or on windy mountain roads at high speed or towing constantly just go with the standard pads. Ceramic pads are superior to normal pads at high temps (less fade) and the only time you will notice is if you meet the conditions above. Otherwise standard pads work just as well, are generally quiter, and don't wear your rotors as much.
#15
Unless you are driving the thing on a track or on windy mountain roads at high speed or towing constantly just go with the standard pads. Ceramic pads are superior to normal pads at high temps (less fade) and the only time you will notice is if you meet the conditions above. Otherwise standard pads work just as well, are generally quiter, and don't wear your rotors as much.
#16
that_guy, i misunderstood what you were trying to get at, it sounded to me like you were comparing the different brands of pads even tho they had not been installed on the same vehicle.
that said, cross drilled rotors are VERY prone to heat cracking from the holes, and it makes perfect sense from an engineering standpoint, you have heat concentrations at those point, this causes stress build up, the holes reduce material (and therefore strength) and the rotors fatigue faster than solid (vented) discs. Fatigued metal cracks, this is why race cars typically use slotted rotors only, they hold up much better than cross drilled ones and they provide the added benefit of 'cleaning' the pads friction surface to prevent glazing. (think of the slot edge as a razor, and it shaves off the glazed or overheated pad material leaving nice fresh friction surface for braking). (yes some of this information is vastly simplified since i dont think most people want to read the in depth engineering based explanations)
However i still run solid rotors on all my street driven vehicles because they last longer (more material), are cheaper to replace and function above the requirements of street driving.
Also as far as fade resistance goes it all depends on the pad compound and each manufacturer will have their own proprietary compound which will have a different heat range. All brake pads have an effective heat range, carbon/ceramic(and before that but to a lesser extent, metallic) pads have an exceptionally high heat range which means that they will not grab well when cold and must warm up before you get good performance. Ceramic and Semi-Metallic will both have lower heat ranges(these will work well when cold, which is most street driving), with semi-metallic having the widest range of possible heat ranges. A good set of ceramics COULD have a higher heat fade resistance than a set of cheap semi-metallics, but that would be at the cost to cold brake performance.
Pspklutch
no harm, just clarifying the information it is an easy mistake to make since there were ALOT of changes made to the 2001 over the 98-00 trucks, the brakes just doesnt happen to be one of them.
now back to the OP, if you want to simplify things and get the best performance from a stock pad for a reasonable cost, i suggest you get your hands on a set of police package brakes for these trucks, they got a more aggressive (softer) compound in order to increase braking performance without changing the rotors/calipers or anything else in the braking system. Otherwise buying performance brake parts can get expensive very quickly
that said, cross drilled rotors are VERY prone to heat cracking from the holes, and it makes perfect sense from an engineering standpoint, you have heat concentrations at those point, this causes stress build up, the holes reduce material (and therefore strength) and the rotors fatigue faster than solid (vented) discs. Fatigued metal cracks, this is why race cars typically use slotted rotors only, they hold up much better than cross drilled ones and they provide the added benefit of 'cleaning' the pads friction surface to prevent glazing. (think of the slot edge as a razor, and it shaves off the glazed or overheated pad material leaving nice fresh friction surface for braking). (yes some of this information is vastly simplified since i dont think most people want to read the in depth engineering based explanations)
However i still run solid rotors on all my street driven vehicles because they last longer (more material), are cheaper to replace and function above the requirements of street driving.
Also as far as fade resistance goes it all depends on the pad compound and each manufacturer will have their own proprietary compound which will have a different heat range. All brake pads have an effective heat range, carbon/ceramic(and before that but to a lesser extent, metallic) pads have an exceptionally high heat range which means that they will not grab well when cold and must warm up before you get good performance. Ceramic and Semi-Metallic will both have lower heat ranges(these will work well when cold, which is most street driving), with semi-metallic having the widest range of possible heat ranges. A good set of ceramics COULD have a higher heat fade resistance than a set of cheap semi-metallics, but that would be at the cost to cold brake performance.
Pspklutch
no harm, just clarifying the information it is an easy mistake to make since there were ALOT of changes made to the 2001 over the 98-00 trucks, the brakes just doesnt happen to be one of them.
now back to the OP, if you want to simplify things and get the best performance from a stock pad for a reasonable cost, i suggest you get your hands on a set of police package brakes for these trucks, they got a more aggressive (softer) compound in order to increase braking performance without changing the rotors/calipers or anything else in the braking system. Otherwise buying performance brake parts can get expensive very quickly
#17
#18
The total reality is that the truck is 17 years old and most vehicles that age have 200k+ miles on them. It really doesn't matter what pads you put on it because after 2 weeks of driving it around you will be used to the new way it glides to a stop (better or worse than original) just go to Autozone (or your favorite part store) grab whatever they have around $20 and you will probably be happy enough with them. Odds are if you were happy before that is what the truck was running anyway and being that old odds are you will be driving something else before they need replaced again.
#19
that_guy, i misunderstood what you were trying to get at, it sounded to me like you were comparing the different brands of pads even tho they had not been installed on the same vehicle.
that said, cross drilled rotors are VERY prone to heat cracking from the holes, and it makes perfect sense from an engineering standpoint, you have heat concentrations at those point, this causes stress build up, the holes reduce material (and therefore strength) and the rotors fatigue faster than solid (vented) discs. Fatigued metal cracks, this is why race cars typically use slotted rotors only, they hold up much better than cross drilled ones and they provide the added benefit of 'cleaning' the pads friction surface to prevent glazing. (think of the slot edge as a razor, and it shaves off the glazed or overheated pad material leaving nice fresh friction surface for braking). (yes some of this information is vastly simplified since i dont think most people want to read the in depth engineering based explanations)
However i still run solid rotors on all my street driven vehicles because they last longer (more material), are cheaper to replace and function above the requirements of street driving.
that said, cross drilled rotors are VERY prone to heat cracking from the holes, and it makes perfect sense from an engineering standpoint, you have heat concentrations at those point, this causes stress build up, the holes reduce material (and therefore strength) and the rotors fatigue faster than solid (vented) discs. Fatigued metal cracks, this is why race cars typically use slotted rotors only, they hold up much better than cross drilled ones and they provide the added benefit of 'cleaning' the pads friction surface to prevent glazing. (think of the slot edge as a razor, and it shaves off the glazed or overheated pad material leaving nice fresh friction surface for braking). (yes some of this information is vastly simplified since i dont think most people want to read the in depth engineering based explanations)
However i still run solid rotors on all my street driven vehicles because they last longer (more material), are cheaper to replace and function above the requirements of street driving.
that is true
The total reality is that the truck is 17 years old and most vehicles that age have 200k+ miles on them. It really doesn't matter what pads you put on it because after 2 weeks of driving it around you will be used to the new way it glides to a stop (better or worse than original) just go to Autozone (or your favorite part store) grab whatever they have around $20 and you will probably be happy enough with them. Odds are if you were happy before that is what the truck was running anyway and being that old odds are you will be driving something else before they need replaced again.
The total reality is that the truck is 17 years old and most vehicles that age have 200k+ miles on them. It really doesn't matter what pads you put on it because after 2 weeks of driving it around you will be used to the new way it glides to a stop (better or worse than original) just go to Autozone (or your favorite part store) grab whatever they have around $20 and you will probably be happy enough with them. Odds are if you were happy before that is what the truck was running anyway and being that old odds are you will be driving something else before they need replaced again.