Tranny trouble
I find it more odd that a 5.2l has a 46RE behind it, at least in a Durango anyways. From the factory the Durango/Dakota with 5.2’s where mated with a 44RE, Only the 5.9’s got the 46RE. If in fact the OP has a 5.2 with a 46RE it was a backyard mod done by a previous owner. While they physically mate up, if the PCM was not flashed for the new tranny it could be the root creating the issues.
I find it more odd that a 5.2l has a 46RE behind it, at least in a Durango anyways. From the factory the Durango/Dakota with 5.2’s where mated with a 44RE, Only the 5.9’s got the 46RE. If in fact the OP has a 5.2 with a 46RE it was a backyard mod done by a previous owner. While they physically mate up, if the PCM was not flashed for the new tranny it could be the root creating the issues.
I find it more odd that a 5.2l has a 46RE behind it, at least in a Durango anyways. From the factory the Durango/Dakota with 5.2’s where mated with a 44RE, Only the 5.9’s got the 46RE. If in fact the OP has a 5.2 with a 46RE it was a backyard mod done by a previous owner. While they physically mate up, if the PCM was not flashed for the new tranny it could be the root creating the issues.










