1st Gen Ram Tech '93 & older Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve 1993 Rams and older. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

HP in a 318?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-28-2009 | 06:09 AM
Mad Mudder's Avatar
Mad Mudder
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 229
Likes: 1
From: Mocksville,NC
Question HP in a 318?

Dose anyone know what a stock 318 turns out (HP)? It has a 2bbl on it for now.
 
  #2  
Old 03-28-2009 | 10:33 AM
HellaciousHemi's Avatar
HellaciousHemi
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: NE, Ohio
Default

Well the Magnum 318s from 1991 to 1996 produce 230hp apparently. Its probably less for your 2v engine. But I haven't come across any compression ratios either. A lot of the stuff that came up was aftermarket hp stuff from adding performance parts etc. BUT, my Chiltons says (O I love actually having the literature!). This is terrible '79 is 140 @ 4000 w/ 245Tq @ 1600 ~ '80 -'81 is 120 @ 3600 w/ 245Tq @ 1600 ~ '82 - '84 120 @ 3600 w/ 245Tq @ 1600 ~ '85 - '86 104 @ 3600 w/ 140Tq @ 3600. For compression 1979 has 8.6:1 ~ "80 -"84 is 8.5:1 ~ '85 - '86 is 9.0:1.
 
  #3  
Old 03-28-2009 | 11:33 AM
nemesis_SS's Avatar
nemesis_SS
All Star
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 861
Likes: 1
From:
Default

people wonder why the 318 lasts so long? because its lazy.

no doubt its a great engine, and i can go if you wanna do the work to wake it up.

but nevertheless VERY lazy. ricers with four bangers get more power and mileage.
 
  #4  
Old 03-29-2009 | 07:35 AM
Mad Mudder's Avatar
Mad Mudder
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 229
Likes: 1
From: Mocksville,NC
Default

Originally Posted by HellaciousHemi
Well the Magnum 318s from 1991 to 1996 produce 230hp apparently. Its probably less for your 2v engine. But I haven't come across any compression ratios either. A lot of the stuff that came up was aftermarket hp stuff from adding performance parts etc. BUT, my Chiltons says (O I love actually having the literature!). This is terrible '79 is 140 @ 4000 w/ 245Tq @ 1600 ~ '80 -'81 is 120 @ 3600 w/ 245Tq @ 1600 ~ '82 - '84 120 @ 3600 w/ 245Tq @ 1600 ~ '85 - '86 104 @ 3600 w/ 140Tq @ 3600. For compression 1979 has 8.6:1 ~ "80 -"84 is 8.5:1 ~ '85 - '86 is 9.0:1.
That dose it I have to get more power out of my truck.
 
  #5  
Old 03-29-2009 | 07:40 AM
Mad Mudder's Avatar
Mad Mudder
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 229
Likes: 1
From: Mocksville,NC
Default

Originally Posted by HellaciousHemi
Well the Magnum 318s from 1991 to 1996 produce 230hp apparently. Its probably less for your 2v engine. But I haven't come across any compression ratios either. A lot of the stuff that came up was aftermarket hp stuff from adding performance parts etc. BUT, my Chiltons says (O I love actually having the literature!). This is terrible '79 is 140 @ 4000 w/ 245Tq @ 1600 ~ '80 -'81 is 120 @ 3600 w/ 245Tq @ 1600 ~ '82 - '84 120 @ 3600 w/ 245Tq @ 1600 ~ '85 - '86 104 @ 3600 w/ 140Tq @ 3600. For compression 1979 has 8.6:1 ~ "80 -"84 is 8.5:1 ~ '85 - '86 is 9.0:1.
Is that Hp. same for a W150 and for a D150? I know that some times in like Chevy's the truck eng. would have the same cid but dif hp.
 
  #6  
Old 03-29-2009 | 09:52 AM
HellaciousHemi's Avatar
HellaciousHemi
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: NE, Ohio
Default

Between vans, trucks & traildusters/ramchargers there is NO difference according to Chiltons. Unless you have a 4v engine. The 4v engines have more hp , but, its not a big difference from the 2v engine models for the '80s.
 
  #7  
Old 04-01-2009 | 08:06 AM
Mad Mudder's Avatar
Mad Mudder
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 229
Likes: 1
From: Mocksville,NC
Default

Originally Posted by HellaciousHemi
Between vans, trucks & traildusters/ramchargers there is NO difference according to Chiltons. Unless you have a 4v engine. The 4v engines have more hp , but, its not a big difference from the 2v engine models for the '80s.
How do I tell if I have a 2v or 4v?
 
  #8  
Old 04-01-2009 | 02:35 PM
HellaciousHemi's Avatar
HellaciousHemi
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: NE, Ohio
Default

The V stands for Venturi. Carburetor designs employ 1 venturi to 1 barrel. 2v, a.k.a 2 barrel carburetor like yours. I have heard of the Variable venturi carburetor, but now nothing about it.
 
  #9  
Old 04-01-2009 | 07:35 PM
charlie1935's Avatar
charlie1935
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,977
Likes: 1
From: DuQuoin,IL.
Default

Originally Posted by HellaciousHemi
The V stands for Venturi. Carburetor designs employ 1 venturi to 1 barrel. 2v, a.k.a 2 barrel carburetor like yours. I have heard of the Variable venturi carburetor, but now nothing about it.
Ford had that in 1978 I think it was. It was a two barrel but the venturi were variable like a motorcycle or SU carbs on English cars. The Ford version was complicated as hell.
 
  #10  
Old 04-01-2009 | 08:15 PM
lugnuts's Avatar
lugnuts
All Star
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
From: Odessa Tx.
Default

Originally Posted by charlie1935
Ford had that in 1978 I think it was. It was a two barrel but the venturi were variable like a motorcycle or SU carbs on English cars. The Ford version was complicated as hell.
Yup. The Ford VV sucked.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:24 PM.