2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

should i race?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 03:40 PM
  #11  
Midnight SRT's Avatar
Midnight SRT
Nightly Creeper
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 29,504
Likes: 6
From: Tallahassee, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by wink2873
Volkswagen: The same people who brought you WWII and mass genocide.

Kill that **** krautmobile, besides... you've got about 3x the displacement as he does. as long as you get a good launch you should beat him.
LOL You're not actually thinking it through... but you're right

Dakota R/T, RWD, Auto, .06513 P/W (Give or take, read your mods. Add more.)
Beetle 1.8T AWD (?), Auto, .04996 P/W (give or take, don't know his)

You should have him. You have a little bit more HP than the stock R/T, so P/W ratio is slightly higher. If he does have AWD, he will beat you off the line and depending on how far you go, you will catch him pretty quickly.
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 03:52 PM
  #12  
rtdakota2001's Avatar
rtdakota2001
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 1
From: CHICAGO
Default

whats the formula for the P/W ratio? i forgot.
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 03:59 PM
  #13  
wink2873's Avatar
wink2873
Record Breaker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 4
From: Norwalk, Ohio
Default

I'm always right
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 04:15 PM
  #14  
Midnight SRT's Avatar
Midnight SRT
Nightly Creeper
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 29,504
Likes: 6
From: Tallahassee, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by rtdakota2001
whats the formula for the P/W ratio? i forgot.
Horsepower divided by weight.
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 04:41 PM
  #15  
TheePlaymaker's Avatar
TheePlaymaker
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 2
From: Willow Street, PA
Default

do you know what year it is because halfway through 02 they upped the boost on the 1.8t and some otherthings and gave it 180 horse instead of 150
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 04:47 PM
  #16  
TheePlaymaker's Avatar
TheePlaymaker
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 2
From: Willow Street, PA
Default

power to weights are a lot closer if its the 180 horse 1.8t and im only defending the engine not the beetle i know these things can ball becasue my friend has the 150 horse version in a jetta with no chip but some other things and it owns turbo eclipse's and colbalt ss's all day
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 04:59 PM
  #17  
Midnight SRT's Avatar
Midnight SRT
Nightly Creeper
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 29,504
Likes: 6
From: Tallahassee, Florida
Default

According to everything I can find, the only model with 180 horses, is the S. The change in 2002 was the S, with the 1.8T 180 hp engine.
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 06:20 PM
  #18  
TheePlaymaker's Avatar
TheePlaymaker
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 2
From: Willow Street, PA
Default

oh i guess im thinkin jetta's and gti's then because after 02 all 1.8t's were 180 horse
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 09:19 PM
  #19  
wink2873's Avatar
wink2873
Record Breaker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 4
From: Norwalk, Ohio
Default

it doesnt matter 150 or 180, I know it doesnt have 300 ft. lbs of torque.
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 10:38 PM
  #20  
Midnight SRT's Avatar
Midnight SRT
Nightly Creeper
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 29,504
Likes: 6
From: Tallahassee, Florida
Default

No but it has AWD... if it had 180 hp and AWD... It'd be closer.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:36 AM.