2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

crazy suspension idea

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 01:03 PM
  #21  
batman13's Avatar
batman13
Grand Champion
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,597
Likes: 0
From: N.Ridgeville, OH
Default

you can switch out rear-ends, bigger tires on a muscle car and you can get it to hook up fine,in a car,
the R/Ts are extremely lighter in the rear, thats the problem, not enough down force, and a truck suspension, you can spends moths trying to get your leafs to work. trac bars and all, but it will handle like a drag racer, and will be extremely rough for daily use
the best way to upgrade would be to go coils, drag or track.

i do think the dakotas suspenion is far better than most other trucks out there.
but its still a truck
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 02:24 PM
  #22  
moe7404's Avatar
moe7404
Record Breaker
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 1
From:
Default

moe in wichita ks
you dont have to spend mo on leaf springs. like i said do it the way chrysler says. years ago chrysler put out a book called the white book, it had ALL the info you needed. you kids can try to dismiss the old man all you want but i wouldnt tell you something if i didnt know it was right. sounds like you are trying to out guess yourself if it takes mo to sort out somthing. and a mopar set up right does NOT need trac bars. been there done that bought the tee shirt
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 02:39 PM
  #23  
DRO318's Avatar
DRO318
Captain
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 579
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, Tx
Default

I know my leaf springs suck A I was hopin to go for a lifted look with 20's and 33's. hope the new suspension idea will work with that
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 04:55 PM
  #24  
batman13's Avatar
batman13
Grand Champion
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,597
Likes: 0
From: N.Ridgeville, OH
Default

sorry moe, but the old leafs may rock, trust me, i have seen mopars with stock susp. stomp on others with beefed up susp.
but the newer suspensions, are built to cost less and function differently.
im not trying to say you are wrong, but trying to put the information into context.

coils and leafs do have there own separate strengths, that is the reason for swaps.

was this white book actually published? might be something to add to my collection,
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 05:42 PM
  #25  
cudacrazy73's Avatar
cudacrazy73
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default

hey batman are u on dak-dur? Iv been talkin to a bunch of guys on there but ill just try to sum this up quick cuz im thread jackin i had really expensive rims they are now smashed and so is a control arm insurance is paying for it all, i wana lower my truck and get new rims im pretty much decided on DJM 2" control arms and a hanger kit in the rear I have an 03 dak R/T on 22" rims, 28" overall height. I do plan to do a full bag job this winter or maybe next year depending how money comes and goes. reason im going with the arms now is they are basicly free and my truck sits like a "donk" right now and i dont like it. question is do you think this will work ok? it a temp fix and like i said insurance needs to replace my C arms anyways so why not lower it at the same time, u seem to know what ur talkin about so i just need a lil more info before i go out and order all my new stuff thanks man. sry to thread jack!!!
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 01:32 PM
  #26  
69rrbruce's Avatar
69rrbruce
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: NW Suburb of MPLS
Default

Originally Posted by rtdakota2001
so i really want coils instead of leaves in the rear of my R/T. my idea was this: leave the shocks where they are. take off the spring perch's from a JGC (ZJ) and weld them on to my axle and frame. then measure for springs. the only thing i can think of is a problem with axle wrap. what do you guys think?
Why do you want to get rid of the leafs? It's going to cost you a lot to make this kind of change. If you want to limit the axle wrap install a set of traction bars or better yet "Caltracs" (www.caltracracing.com).
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 02:29 PM
  #27  
batman13's Avatar
batman13
Grand Champion
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,597
Likes: 0
From: N.Ridgeville, OH
Default

Originally Posted by 69rrbruce
Why do you want to get rid of the leafs?
why not?

lol
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 02:45 PM
  #28  
rtdakota2001's Avatar
rtdakota2001
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 1
From: CHICAGO
Default

Originally Posted by 69rrbruce
Why do you want to get rid of the leafs? It's going to cost you a lot to make this kind of change. If you want to limit the axle wrap install a set of traction bars or better yet "Caltracs" (www.caltracracing.com).
because the difference between caltacs and 4 links is like the difference between the Cubs and White Sox, one is decent but wont take you too far and the other is a powerhouse who won a world series 3 years ago and isn't the gayest team in the midwest......ok, not the best analogy, i'm just sick of hearing about carlos zabrano's no hitter last night.

lets just say the differnce is night and day, shall we?
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 09:42 PM
  #29  
dakotas ram's Avatar
dakotas ram
Champion
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 2
From: NW Arkansas
Default

why dont you just go to a salvage yard and get a rear independent suspension system out of a car?
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 09:57 PM
  #30  
f0x672's Avatar
f0x672
Champion
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 1
From: poconos, pa
Default

Originally Posted by dakotas ram
why dont you just go to a salvage yard and get a rear independent suspension system out of a car?
CV joints on independent suspension axles are far from reliable compared to solid live axles... our real axles can handle a large amount of torque without worry
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:52 AM.