2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

should i race?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 02:07 PM
  #1  
Loud Pedal's Avatar
Loud Pedal
Thread Starter
|
The Total Package
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Default should i race?

so heres that deal....my friend has an 01 ranger with the 4.0L SOHC Auto 4x4 and the mods are K&N CAI, turbo tube dual exhaust(larger glasspack), off road TA's tires...

mine is a 4.7L 2wd and the mods are CAI, strait pipe exhaust(not cat or muffler), and 275 45 r 20 tires auto ......i think i mught put my stock rims and tires on to get the tires to rotate faster(there slicks neways)........

i was in his truck when he raced his dads truck and its a 99 f150 5.4 and the ranger has him off the line.....do i have a chance?
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 02:29 PM
  #2  
driver1's Avatar
driver1
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: wash
Default

i think you do have a chance if you can get a good start at the line and dont have any wheelspin. and as for i would use what ever tires are soft enough to give you more grip and may want to think about lowering to tire psi down like on the drag cars.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 02:42 PM
  #3  
rtdakota2001's Avatar
rtdakota2001
Record Breaker
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 1
From: CHICAGO
Default

i would think you got him
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 03:55 PM
  #4  
matj1990's Avatar
matj1990
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: massena ny
Default

race and fine out does it realy matter its always fun to see what realy happens
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 04:44 PM
  #5  
varsis's Avatar
varsis
Record Breaker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,320
Likes: 1
Default

i think your smoke him. Dakota's are fast with the v8 esp. And you got 2wd and not 4wd.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 05:26 PM
  #6  
wink2873's Avatar
wink2873
Record Breaker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 4
From: Norwalk, Ohio
Default

hell i beat a 4x4 ranger 4.0 auto in my 3.9... you've got him easily. I'll even show you proof, the link is to track times, my name is Ryan Winkelman BTW you can see me on there. I came in 2nd in the truck/van class that night and it was only like the 2nd time i ever raced. Just to clear things up, I actually lost the race because my truck got hot and slow so i was way off from my dial in time, but my 1/4 mile was faster than the ranger.
http://www.norwalkraceway.com/racer-...s-8-9-results/
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 06:01 PM
  #7  
asilaydying's Avatar
asilaydying
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Buckeye City
Default

YESSS!!! Post your results!! You should beat him as long as nothing goes wrong. I ended up about two car lengths back from a 4.0 ranger with my V6.
check out details in this thread:
https://dodgeforum.com/forum/2nd-gen-dakota-tech/167351-04-ford-ranger-will-dust-your-dakota.html

I gave up racing him now until i put 15's back on but my buddy with a 4.7 is waiting to leave the same time as the 4.0 guy in the thread. if that happens before you race i'll post his results!

GL!
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 06:52 PM
  #8  
TheePlaymaker's Avatar
TheePlaymaker
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 2
From: Willow Street, PA
Default

you should have him weight reduce as much as possible, 5.4's aint got **** so i'm sure the 4.0 isn't much faster even tho rangers are lighter, i raced a 5.4 and if i wasn't so worried about missing 3rd like the first race I woulda smoked his *** before i hit the top of 3rd then 4th and that was before the hurst, rebuilt rearend and superchips heres a vid of my race versus the 5.4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zfFXC3b2u8 like i said i had a real ****ty launch then slow shifted 2nd and 3rd so i didn't miss then with an auto you should be golden.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 09:35 PM
  #9  
Loud Pedal's Avatar
Loud Pedal
Thread Starter
|
The Total Package
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by TheePlaymaker
you should have him weight reduce as much as possible, 5.4's aint got **** so i'm sure the 4.0 isn't much faster even tho rangers are lighter, i raced a 5.4 and if i wasn't so worried about missing 3rd like the first race I woulda smoked his *** before i hit the top of 3rd then 4th and that was before the hurst, rebuilt rearend and superchips heres a vid of my race versus the 5.4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zfFXC3b2u8 like i said i had a real ****ty launch then slow shifted 2nd and 3rd so i didn't miss then with an auto you should be golden.
i seen that vid way back......nice!

ok thanks for the imput...he says hes gonna get me off the line but hes got no top end....so next time were out ill see about videoing it
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 10:18 PM
  #10  
TheePlaymaker's Avatar
TheePlaymaker
Record Breaker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 2
From: Willow Street, PA
Default

yeah i haven't talked to that kid in a while haha i need to get another vid though of my truck runnin up through the gears with the superchips on performance tune if i can ever get it to not ping...im gonna use up all my 87 on the way home from school this weekend then fill up with 93 back home and see if i can get it to work on performance mode on the way back up to school sunday without pinging. good luck you'll take him rangers aint got **** lol and its a ford
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:57 PM.