2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

Shorty Headers...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-07-2009 | 06:02 AM
big.bryant's Avatar
big.bryant
Thread Starter
|
Champion
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,664
Likes: 0
From: University of Colorado-Boulder
Default Shorty Headers...

So i found these shorty headers for my 4.7 (looks like a decent price too), and just wanted to know, potentially what kind of power i would be gaining... If i remember correctly, shorties give hp while long(ies) give more torque, but would getting shorties reduce my current torque output?

Here's the link: http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
 
  #2  
Old 05-07-2009 | 11:06 AM
wink2873's Avatar
wink2873
Record Breaker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 2
From: Norwalk, Ohio
Default

you wont be gaining any power. 4.7 manifolds flow within 2% of headers. the only logical reason to put headers on a 4.7 is if you want a better exhaust sound or if you're boosted. also, those are only painted... they'll look like rusty pieces of crap within 6 months.
 
  #3  
Old 05-07-2009 | 01:19 PM
rtdakota2001's Avatar
rtdakota2001
Record Breaker
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 1
From: CHICAGO
Default

yeah but for that price i would just deal with the rust, if you go with shorties and no cats that little 4.7 will still sound pretty gnarly. if they rust out in 3 years, whatever, theyre cheap, get another set. maybe by then someone will make an affordable priced set of LT's for your motor.
 
  #4  
Old 06-20-2009 | 02:39 AM
dodgeheller99's Avatar
dodgeheller99
Rookie
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: chicago
Default

throw some high temp paint on them before your drop them in for a little more piece of mind
 
  #5  
Old 06-20-2009 | 02:56 AM
User's Avatar
User
Champion
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 6
From: Roanoke, Texas
Default

I woudn't even spend the money on headers unless you where to get longtubes.. not worth it...

spead the money on a better Throttle Body or H/O intake Manifold... or H/O cams..
 
  #6  
Old 06-20-2009 | 06:02 AM
Loud Pedal's Avatar
Loud Pedal
The Total Package
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Default

lol

go with what user said...better in the long run
 
  #7  
Old 06-20-2009 | 12:18 PM
rtdakota2001's Avatar
rtdakota2001
Record Breaker
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 1
From: CHICAGO
Default

too bad no one really makes anything for that crappy motor. HO cams would be the way to start i would think, followed up with an intake manifold and TB. but again, really, why even try with that little 4.7.......
 
  #8  
Old 06-20-2009 | 02:56 PM
Loud Pedal's Avatar
Loud Pedal
The Total Package
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by rtdakota2001
too bad no one really makes anything for that crappy motor. HO cams would be the way to start i would think, followed up with an intake manifold and TB. but again, really, why even try with that little 4.7.......
if you still have that damn truck in a couple of years in gonna drive to chicago and whip your ***!!!!!!!!!!
 
  #9  
Old 06-20-2009 | 04:21 PM
User's Avatar
User
Champion
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 6
From: Roanoke, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by rtdakota2001
too bad no one really makes anything for that crappy motor. HO cams would be the way to start i would think, followed up with an intake manifold and TB. but again, really, why even try with that little 4.7.......
The 4.7 is a better motor then the 5.9. We just have more aftermarket to make it Better then the new **** coming out... sadly the new v6s coming out have MORE HP and almost the same torque as our old 5.9 v8s.

So leave the 4.7 guys alone. Its a v8 thats all that matters pick on the 3.7 and 3.9 people... and the people with the 4cyl... dont even bother with them.
 




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:51 PM.