2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

engine swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2011 | 01:28 AM
  #1  
bigbraunboy's Avatar
bigbraunboy
Thread Starter
|
Amateur
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: B.C., Canada
Default engine swap

Was wondering how hard an engine swap from a 2000 4.7 to a later 318 or even a 360 would be, and if an auto transmission from a 4.7 would bolt up to a 318. Thanks
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2011 | 01:31 AM
  #2  
ryan_brown33's Avatar
ryan_brown33
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 298
Likes: 2
From: Denver, CO
Default

it wont, its completely different technology since the 4.7 replaced the 318, so im not sure what you mean by later 318 since the last one in daks was 1999. the transmission will not bolt up either. same goes for the 360, it will not work at all. you would need a different engine and cab wiring harness, ecu, different motor mounts, different tranny mounts, different tranny and t case. if you really dont want a 4.7 and you really do want a 318 or 360, you should sell the 4.7 and just buy a dak with either of those motors already outfitted with it.
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2011 | 01:35 AM
  #3  
InnerCityHillBilly's Avatar
InnerCityHillBilly
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by ryan_brown33
it wont, its completely different technology since the 4.7 replaced the 318, so im not sure what you mean by later 318 since the last one in daks was 1999. the transmission will not bolt up either. same goes for the 360, it will not work at all. you would need a different engine and cab wiring harness, ecu, different motor mounts, different tranny mounts, different tranny and t case. if you really dont want a 4.7 and you really do want a 318 or 360, you should sell the 4.7 and just buy a dak with either of those motors already outfitted with it.
what i think hes sayin about the swap is it will take a lot of time and money, haha would be a nice project
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2011 | 01:37 AM
  #4  
ryan_brown33's Avatar
ryan_brown33
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 298
Likes: 2
From: Denver, CO
Default

not worth it but thats just my opinion. if your motor is toast i would just rebuild the 4.7 is would be easier cheaper and take way less time
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2011 | 03:05 AM
  #5  
Blaze10's Avatar
Blaze10
Record Breaker
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
From: Clinton County, Pa
Default

or get a HO 4.7 like thunder did... just saying.. ;]
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2011 | 03:49 AM
  #6  
bigbraunboy's Avatar
bigbraunboy
Thread Starter
|
Amateur
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: B.C., Canada
Default

hehe yea, thought id ask lol... thanks for the info guys prob just end up rebuilding her..thanks again
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2011 | 09:10 AM
  #7  
ryan_brown33's Avatar
ryan_brown33
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 298
Likes: 2
From: Denver, CO
Default

its just so much work to do you know. if you end up swapping then HO would be the way to go, but nothing wrong with a standard rebuild
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2011 | 01:07 PM
  #8  
bigbraunboy's Avatar
bigbraunboy
Thread Starter
|
Amateur
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: B.C., Canada
Default

Exactly, thought id try lol
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2011 | 01:08 PM
  #9  
bigbraunboy's Avatar
bigbraunboy
Thread Starter
|
Amateur
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: B.C., Canada
Default

Oh what years did the "HO" came out in, just wondering for **** and giggles
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2011 | 02:18 PM
  #10  
dodgeramguy85's Avatar
dodgeramguy85
Grand Champion
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,508
Likes: 7
From: Houtzdale,PA
Default

I believe they started to put them in 2000 grand cherokees until 04. Im sure thunder will jump in I know he knows every detail about them.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:51 AM.