2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

shaft mount roller rockers vs stock pedestal mount

Old Sep 11, 2011 | 05:08 PM
  #1  
vimnjicki's Avatar
vimnjicki
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Redlands, California
Default shaft mount roller rockers vs stock pedestal mount

do shaft mount roller rockers really yield a net gain in hp versus stock pedestal mount, non-rollers? by net gain i mean at the rear wheels. when I dis-assembled my 5.9 the stock rockers felt and sounded so loose. I know it would make me "feel" better for them to not be so loose feeling and sounding, but would the hp increase be worth the money? Thanks
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2011 | 05:13 PM
  #2  
magnethead's Avatar
magnethead
Legend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,058
Likes: 184
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

Yes, there is a significant difference.
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2011 | 06:11 PM
  #3  
vimnjicki's Avatar
vimnjicki
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Redlands, California
Default

Aww, man! dont tease me. Numbers! I need numbers!
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2011 | 06:16 PM
  #4  
DakMan6704's Avatar
DakMan6704
Captain
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

I would go with no. Dyno numbers...you might get a few HP, but $/HP, I dont think youd be happy.

On a race motor, diff story...but for a somewhat stocker, esp a 3.9...wait, where is the 5.9 coming from? Swap?
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2011 | 06:21 PM
  #5  
magnethead's Avatar
magnethead
Legend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,058
Likes: 184
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

Originally Posted by DakMan6704
I would go with no. Dyno numbers...you might get a few HP, but $/HP, I dont think youd be happy.

On a race motor, diff story...but for a somewhat stocker, esp a 3.9...wait, where is the 5.9 coming from? Swap?
as always, depends on what else you do. Stock tune the rockers wont do anything. Take advantage with tuner and/or exhaust/intake and they're worth something. It's equiv to a cam swap, without the cam swap.
 

Last edited by magnethead; Sep 11, 2011 at 06:27 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2011 | 12:34 AM
  #6  
vimnjicki's Avatar
vimnjicki
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Redlands, California
Default

Oh yeah. I forgot to mention that I am swapping the stock 3.9 for the same year 5.9. Sorry. The block is in the machine shop getting bored .040 over, zero decked, align honed, squared, blah, blah, blah. I'm replacing the stock heads with cast iron RHS X heads with 2.02 intakes and 1.62 exhaust. I'm still deliberating over the cam because I want good low end torque without sacrificing too much at the middle and top end, maybe a range of 1000-5000rpm. I love the sound of a V8 screaming but dont really want to go with solid lifters and all the changes that would have to be made. I think an edelbrock F1 Airgap intake with a 53mm throttle body will make the power i want. but those are the plans, anyway, for the engine. so would the roller rockers really make an appreciable difference in the hp with this setup?
 
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2011 | 01:48 AM
  #7  
magnethead's Avatar
magnethead
Legend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,058
Likes: 184
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

IMO it'd be more reliable and stronger...esp if you're gonna have a high seat pressure.

I'm assuming you're going to have a tuner as well?
 
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2011 | 07:19 AM
  #8  
DakMan6704's Avatar
DakMan6704
Captain
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

Are you implying that simply swapping rockers, from stock to rollers is equivalent to changing the actual cams? I hope you're not serious.
You can maybe get higher lift rockers, but, they still keep the time the stock cam has, and would only allow a bit more air/fuel in; or exhaust out. That is unless you get the roller set off to advance/retard the lobe on the stock cam.

It really sounds like you should talk to a motor shop vimnjicki. Or, find someone who has a full set up, similar to what you want to achieve. You should really design your exepectations, then build the motor to them. You can put $12K in great parts into an engine, and still have a POS. I would seriously consider having everything laid out. If you have all your numbers, which you seem to have around 60% of them, call Comp, or a few other cam guys. They can grind a cam to meet your needs. Balance low end, and high end. Make a plan, and stick to it. Don't piece things in to attemt to make it better, just cause there are shinier parts or someone somewhere gained 'mad speed' from a perceived upgrade.
Oh yea, what are you doing with the truck? DD? Track? P-Wagon? ha!

As always, beware the internet.
 
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2011 | 08:33 AM
  #9  
98DAKAZ's Avatar
98DAKAZ
Champion
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,895
Likes: 35
From: Gilbert, Arizona
Exclamation I dont think magnethead said that

I dont think magnethead said that.

To me anything that can reduce wear and improve efficiency is a plus if you can afford the price stock are fine the roller rockers if a quality design are more efficient. Improved or increased power maybe not but an improvement over stock yes.

You must question the quality of any aftermarket product and the dependability of that product some are great at what they offer and some are questionable and you are better off not buying it.

Always ask about a product from people that have used it if it’s worth it to use or avoid it at all costs like the plague.
 
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2011 | 11:22 AM
  #10  
magnethead's Avatar
magnethead
Legend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,058
Likes: 184
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

Originally Posted by DakMan6704
Are you implying that simply swapping rockers, from stock to rollers is equivalent to changing the actual cams? I hope you're not serious.
You can maybe get higher lift rockers, but, they still keep the time the stock cam has, and would only allow a bit more air/fuel in; or exhaust out.
That's all I meant, not that it's the same as a cam change, but can make the engine "think" there was a minor cam change.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 AM.