turbo or supercharger??
#11
#12
#13
Turbo has greater potential, but would require at least some exhaust modification to make it worth it, plus you can change your boost much easier than with a supercharger. Superchargers are cool, but you'll have a lot of parasitic power loss since it is driven by the crank and not the exhaust like a turbo is.
Posted from Dodgeforum.com App for Android
Posted from Dodgeforum.com App for Android
#14
Originally Posted by MoparMan1991
Quote:
Originally Posted by dolittle
Are you kidding with out rebuilding the eng and changing the compression of the the eng.
It is a wast of money.
Now you're just assuming his ride is all stock. Seeing as he didn't include details, it probably is, but to assume is to make an *** of u and me.
Originally Posted by dolittle
Are you kidding with out rebuilding the eng and changing the compression of the the eng.
It is a wast of money.
Now you're just assuming his ride is all stock. Seeing as he didn't include details, it probably is, but to assume is to make an *** of u and me.
Posted from Dodgeforum.com App for Android
#15
Coming from someone who's been there, done that, it's clear you need to do a lot more reading, the info is out there.
That said, I'm a turbo guy. But keep an eye out for the Kenne Bell upgrade kit coming soon http://zcodeperformance.com/index.html
That said, I'm a turbo guy. But keep an eye out for the Kenne Bell upgrade kit coming soon http://zcodeperformance.com/index.html
#16
I need to apologize to the OP. I see your engine is not stock. I would research the cost of doing both I think a turbo would be easier and cheaper (if you can get a kit for the engine) having said that your may get better HP with the mechanical supper charger.
Let us all know how it goes.
Let us all know how it goes.