2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

torque

Old Dec 19, 2006 | 04:31 PM
  #11  
Twiztid's Avatar
Twiztid
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: torque

I actually think he is right. But only because he talks about adding 2 things, 1.7's for higher rpm HP and the 50mm TB for low end TQ. If he were talking just 1.7's then I think it would just be hi rpm HP.

 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 04:40 PM
  #12  
steve05ram360's Avatar
steve05ram360
Hall Of Fame
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,944
Likes: 308
Default RE: torque

I agree... the 1.7's on my 360 were an awesome mod by themselves, also the 52mm TB was awesome by itself... combine the 2 and it is a rockin upgrade. I would stick with a 50mm fastman myself though...
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 06:08 PM
  #13  
dodgedakota98luver's Avatar
dodgedakota98luver
Thread Starter
|
Captain
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 505
Likes: 3
From:
Default RE: torque

so? throttle body first?
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 06:10 PM
  #14  
steve05ram360's Avatar
steve05ram360
Hall Of Fame
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,944
Likes: 308
Default RE: torque

i would do the 50mm fastman TB 1st...
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 05:18 PM
  #15  
Minion's Avatar
Minion
Professional
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: torque

what about an intake mainfold and a cam
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 02:20 AM
  #16  
dodgedakota98luver's Avatar
dodgedakota98luver
Thread Starter
|
Captain
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 505
Likes: 3
From:
Default RE: torque

what about this throttle body here? also what will it do my my fuel milage up down or nothing?
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...p;autoview=sku
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 02:36 AM
  #17  
horatio102's Avatar
horatio102
Champion
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,710
Likes: 2
From: Skagit County, WA
Default RE: torque

1) it's far too expensive
2) it's too big for your engine

http://www.thefastman.com/Throttlebodies5x.asp

Save yourself some money and get the 50mm Fastman.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 02:54 AM
  #18  
dodgedakota98luver's Avatar
dodgedakota98luver
Thread Starter
|
Captain
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 505
Likes: 3
From:
Default RE: torque

what would it do having 52mm instead of 50? cause all they let is air in. i can see having way too big a carborator cause then you wash the cylander walls down and tear things up. just out of curiosity i dont doubt you on it being too big just curious on what it would do
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 03:17 AM
  #19  
Twiztid's Avatar
Twiztid
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: torque

I have seen the 50mm and 52mm compared on an R/T 5.9L and the 50mm will give better low end torque and 1/8th mile times and the 52mm will give better hi rpm hp for quicker 1/4 times. I chose 50mm do to I like to go slow and 4x4. If your a street racer, I would go 52mm.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 05:29 PM
  #20  
horatio102's Avatar
horatio102
Champion
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,710
Likes: 2
From: Skagit County, WA
Default RE: torque

Twiz - he's got a smaller engine though, and will be using that much less air.

Larger throttle body openings mean less low-rpm control of airflow, which will result in lost power and decreased driveability. Sure, the 52mm will work, as will a 55+, but it's not the best application for your setup, much like a set of 90 lb-hr fuel injectors wouldn't be a good choice.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:41 PM.